Search

Introduction: Rhinitis is one of the most common occupational diseases. It is often neglected by those affected because it causes little disability. It is poorly understood by doctors who have insufficient experience of occupational diseases and their causes. However it is often the first manifestation of a respiratory disorder that may cause physical complications and socio-economic disability., Background: Numerous diverse agents are potential causes of rhinitis. The diagnosis of occupational rhinitis should be considered when sneezing, rhinorrhoea or nasal obstruction are associated with work. The causal agent can be identified by ta-king a careful history. When the mechanism of the disease is immunologic the suspected antigen can be confirmed by skin testing, specific IgE or nasal provocation. The respiratory disorder of which rhinitis is the first manifestation may progress to asthma if the exposure continues. The prevention of occupational rhinitis depends on the reduction of exposure to allergens and/or irritants. When it has developed removal of the causative agent is essential to prevent progression to asthma.

Round atelectasis (AE) is a benign form of respiratory problem which develops due to fixing of the visceral pleura. This lesion for which the principal cause is exposure to asbestos may pose problems of differential diagnosis with bronchopulmonary cancer. In a cohort of 286 patients suffering from benign asbestos related pleural disease the diagnosis of round atelectasis was made on computerized tomography in 26 patients (31 AE) on the following criteria: rounded opacities of less than 7 cm in diameter situated at the periphery of the lung in contact with a thickened pleura with an acute angle linking the pleura and the opacity, a reduction of lung volume on the side of the atelectasis and the presence of a "comet tail sign". These patients were investigated to specify the circumstances of the occurrence, including their symptomatology, the changes in lung function, the topography of the round atelectasis and the associated radiological signs. Intense exposure to asbestos either continuous or discontinuous was found in 19 patients; 20 patients presented with some respiratory symptoms (dyspnoea 15/26, cough 11/26 and chest pain 9/26) but the reduction in lung function was moderate (7 had restrictive ventilatory trouble, 4 obstructive problems and a mixed problem in 1). The preferred localisation for round atelectasis was in the inferior lobes in the posterior basal lateral vertebral area (26/31) which may explain their being frequently missed on the standard radiograph (only one case of round atelectasis was visible on the straight chest radiograph in our study). An understanding of the pathology and the computered tomographic characteristics are now well defined and should enable an unnecessary diagnostic thoracotomy to be avoided which besides has no justification from the functional point of view.