Search

Jun dimerization protein-2 (JDP-2) is a progesterone receptor (PR) coregulatory protein that acts by inducing structure and transcriptional activity in the disordered amino-terminal domain (NTD) of PR. JDP-2 can also potentiate the partial agonist activity of the PR antagonist RU486 by mechanisms that have not been defined. Functional mutagenesis experiments revealed that a subregion of the NTD (amino acids 323-427) was required for the partial agonist activity of RU486 induced by PR interaction with JDP-2. However, this subregion was not required for JDP-2 enhancement of the activity of progestin agonists. Mutation of phosphorylation sites within this region of the NTD showed that phosphorylation of serine 400 was required for the partial agonist activity of RU486 stimulated by JDP-2, but was not required for activity of hormone agonist, either in the presence or absence of JDP-2. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2)/cyclin A is a novel PR coregulator that binds the NTD and acts by phosphorylating steroid receptor coactivator-1 and modulating steroid receptor coactivator-1 interaction with PR. Cdk2/cyclin A also potentiated the partial agonist activity of RU486; however, phosphorylation of serine 400 was not required, indicating that JDP-2 and Cdk2/cyclin A act by distinct mechanisms. We conclude that PR bound to RU486 and associated with JDP-2 adopts an active conformation in a subregion of the NTD requiring phosphorylation of serine 400 that is distinct from that promoted by progestin agonists. These data underscore the structural flexibility of the NTD of PR, and the ability of steroid ligands together with interacting proteins to affect the conformation and activity of the NTD.

Within the human glucocorticoid receptor (GR) steroid binding pocket, tyrosine 735 makes hydrophobic contact with the steroid D ring. Substitution of tyrosine735 selectively impairs glucocorticoid transactivation but not transrepression. We now show, using both mammalian two-hybrid and glutathione-S-transferase pull downs, that such substitutions reduce interaction with steroid receptor coactivator 1, both basally and in response to agonist binding. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen we identified one of the three nuclear receptor interacting domains (NCoR-N1) of nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) as interacting with the GR C terminus in an RU486-specific manner. This was confirmed in mammalian two-hybrid experiments, and so we used the NCoR-N1 peptide to probe the GR C-terminal conformation. Substitution of Tyr735phe, Tyr735val, and Tyr735 ser, which impaired steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC1) interaction, enhanced NCoR-N1 recruitment, basally and after RU486. RU486 did not direct SRC1 recruitment to any of the GR constructs, and dexamethasone did not allow NCoR-N1 recruitment. Using a glutathione-S-transferase pull-down approach, the NCoR-N1 peptide was found to bind the full-length GR constitutively, and no further induction was seen with RU486, but it was reduced by dexamethasone. As both SRC1 and NCoR are predicted to recognize a common hydrophobic cleft in the GR, it seems that changes favorable to one interaction are detrimental to the other, thus identifying a molecular switch.

Nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) are transcription factors with opposing actions in the modulation of immune/inflammatory responses. NF-kappaB induces the expression of proinflammatory genes, while GR suppresses immune function in part by suppressing expression of the same genes. Previously, we demonstrated that physiological antagonism between NF-kappaB and GR is due to a mutual transcriptional antagonism that requires the p65 subunit of NF-kappaB and multiple domains of GR (1). To elucidate the mechanism(s) of NF-kappaB p65 and GR transcriptional antagonism, we analyzed the interactions of wild-type p65 and p65 RHD (rel homology domain, a dominant negative mutant of p65 which lacks a transactivation domain) with GR. We show that p65RHD blocks p65-mediated transactivation, yet does not block the repression of GR transactivation by p65, indicating that transcriptional activity by p65 is not required to repress GR function. Both p65 and p65 RHD physically interact with GR, but only intact p65 represses GR-mediated signaling, implicating the p65 transactivation domain in the transcriptional repression of GR. To further characterize p65-GR interactions, we examined the role of the transcriptional co-integrator CREB binding protein (CBP) in their mutual antagonism. GR-mediated repression of p65 transactivation and p65-mediated repression of GR transactivation, as well as the physical interaction between NF-kappaB and GR, are enhanced by CBP. GR bound to the antagonist RU 486, although transcriptionally inactive, retains the ability to repress p65 transactivation. However, CBP does not physically interact with antagonist-bound GR and does not enhance its repressive effect on p65. These data suggest that CBP functions as an integrator of p65/GR physical interaction, rather than as a limiting cofactor for which p65 and GR compete.

To localize regions conferring ligand binding specificity of the human glucocorticoid (hGR) and progesterone (hPR) receptors, we constructed chimeras comprising the DNA-binding domain of the yeast transcription factor GAL4, linked to the ligand binding domain of hGR or hPR. Replacement of a sequence of hGR encompassing helices H6 and H7 with the homologous sequence from hPR creates a chimeric protein GP3, which binds the progestin RU 27987 with high affinity, and results in a concomitant loss of glucocorticoid binding [dexamethasone (DEX), RU 43044]. Moreover, GP3 is not able to mediate RU 27987-induced transactivation. A detailed mutational analysis of this sequence and the study of the recently solved hPR crystal structure revealed five residues that confer progestin responsiveness to GR or modulate ligand binding and transcriptional activation. Notably, the simultaneous presence of residues Ser637 and Phe639 on GP3, lining the ligand binding pocket, is specifically involved in RU 27987 binding. The absence of residues Asp641, Gln642, and Leu647 on GP3 is accountable for the lack of glucocorticoids binding on GP3. Unlike residue 642, residues 641 and 647 are not in direct contact with the ligand and most likely act through steric-mediated interactions. The presence of Gln642 and Leu647 are determinant for transcriptional activation in response to DEX and RU 27987, respectively. DEX-dependent transactivation is further enhanced by the presence of Leu647.

Full transcriptional activation by steroid hormone receptors requires functional synergy between two transcriptional activation domains (AF) located in the amino (AF-1) and carboxyl (AF-2) terminal regions. One possible mechanism for achieving this functional synergy is a physical intramolecular association between amino (N-) and carboxyl (C-) domains of the receptor. Human progesterone receptor (PR) is expressed in two forms that have distinct functional activities: full-length PR-B and the amino-terminally truncated PR-A. PR-B is generally a stronger activator than PR-A, whereas under certain conditions PR-A can act as a repressor in trans of other steroid receptors. We have analyzed whether separately expressed N- (PR-A and PR-B) and C-domains [hinge plus ligand-binding domain (hLBD)] of PR can functionally interact within cells by mammalian two-hybrid assay and whether this involves direct protein contact as determined in vitro with purified expressed domains of PR. A hormone agonist-dependent interaction between N-domains and the hLBD was observed functionally by mammalian two-hybrid assay and by direct protein-protein interaction assay in vitro. With both experimental approaches, N-C domain interactions were not induced by the progestin antagonist RU486. However, in the presence of the progestin agonist R5020, the N-domain of PR-B interacted more efficiently with the hLBD than the N-domain of PR-A. Coexpression of steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and the CREB binding protein (CBP), enhanced functional interaction between N- and C-domains by mammalian two-hybrid assay. However, addition of SRC-1 and CBP in vitro had no influence on direct interaction between purified N- and C-domains. These results suggest that the interaction between N- and C-domains of PR is direct and requires a hormone agonist-induced conformational change in the LBD that is not allowed by antagonists. Additionally, coactivators are not required for physical association between the N- and C-domains but are capable of enhancing a functionally productive interaction. In addition, the more efficient interaction of the hLBD with the N-domain of PR-B, compared with that of PR-A, suggests that distinct interactions between N- and C-terminal regions contribute to functional differences between PR-A and PR-B.

This study utilizes the mammalian two-hybrid system to examine the role of ligand in the dimerization of human progesterone receptor (hPR). The GAL4 DNA-binding domain and the herpes simplex virus VP16 transactivation domain were fused to the amino terminus of full-length hPR (both the A and B isoforms) to produce chimeric proteins. PR dimerization was detected by the ability of cotransfected GAL4/PR and VP16/PR chimeras in COS cells to induce expression of a reporter gene under the control of GAL4-binding sites (pG5CAT). Hormone agonist-dependent interactions were observed between the two like isoforms of PR (A-A and B-B) and between PR-A and PR-B (A-B), indicating that hormone can stimulate the formation of the three possible dimeric forms of PR within cells. In contrast, neither type I (ZK98299) nor type II (RU486, ZK112993) progestin antagonists stimulated interaction between these same hybrid PR proteins. However, activation of the VP16/PR chimera by antagonists on a progesterone response element-controlled reporter gene (DHRE-E1b-CAT) was only a fraction (4-13%) of that stimulated by agonist R5020. One possibility for the failure to detect an induction in the two-hybrid assay is antagonist-induced repression of the activity of the VP16/PR fusion protein rather than a failure of antagonists to stimulate interaction between the hybrid proteins. To test this idea, an UP-1 carboxyl-terminal truncation mutant of PR was used to construct the two-hybrid proteins. PR-UP-1 selectively binds antagonists, but not agonists, and is fully activated in response to antagonists. Both types of progestin antagonists stimulated interactions between GAL4/PR(UP-1) and VP16/PR(UP-1) hybrid proteins, indicating that antagonists are capable of stimulating PR dimerization in cells and do not function by disrupting or preventing dimerization. To determine whether PR bound to an antagonist can dimerize in whole cells with PR bound to agonist, GAL4/PR(UP-1) was paired in the two-hybrid assay with a VP16/PR fusion protein harboring a point mutation in PR at amino acid 722 (Gly-Cys) that specifically binds progestin agonist but not antagonist. Neither R5020 nor RU486 alone stimulated interaction between these ligand-specific PR hybrid proteins. However, strong interaction was detected by addition of both agonist and antagonists, indicating the formation of mixed ligand heterodimers and that both PR partners require ligand for dimerization to occur. Based on electrophoretic gel mobility shift assays (EMSAs), these heterodimers appear to have substantially reduced DNA binding activity. Progestin antagonists inhibit agonist activation of PR at concentrations that are too low to be accounted for by a simple competition mechanism for binding to PR. We propose that antiprogestin inactivation of PR in trans by heterodimerization contributes to the biological potency of these compounds.

Synthetic steroid hormone antagonists are clinically important compounds that regulate physiological responses to steroid hormones. The antagonists bind to the hormone receptors, which are ligand-inducible transcription factors, and modulate their gene-regulatory activities. In most instances, a steroid receptor, such as progesterone receptor (PR) or estrogen receptor (ER), is transcriptionally inactive when complexed with an antagonist and competitively inhibits transactivation of a target steroid-responsive gene by the cognate hormone-occupied receptor. In certain cellular and promoter contexts, however, antagonist-occupied PR or ER acquires paradoxical agonist-like activity. The cellular mechanisms that determine the switch from the negative to the positive mode of transcriptional regulation by an antagonist-bound steroid receptor are unknown. We now provide strong evidence supporting the existence of a cellular inhibitory cofactor that interacts with the B form of human PR (PR-B) complexed with the antiprogestin RU486 to maintain it in a transcriptionally inactive state. In the presence of unliganded thyroid hormone receptor (TR) or ER complexed with the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen, which presumably sequesters a limiting pool of the inhibitory cofactor, RU486-PR-B functions as a transcriptional activator of a progesterone-responsive gene even in the absence of hormone agonist. In contrast, hormone-occupied TR or ER fails to induce transactivation by RU486-PR-B. Recent studies revealed that a transcriptional corepressor, NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor), interacts with unliganded TR but not with liganded TR. Interestingly, coexpression of NCoR efficiently suppresses the partial agonistic activity of antagonist-occupied PR-B but fails to affect transactivation by agonist-bound PR-B. We further demonstrate that RU486-PR-B interacts physically with NCoR in vitro. These novel observations suggest that the inhibitory cofactor that associates with RU486-PR-B and represses its transcriptional activity is either identical or structurally related to the corepressor NCoR. We propose that cellular mechanisms that determine the switch from the antagonistic to the agonistic activity of RU486-PR-B involve removal of the corepressor from the antagonist-bound receptor so that it can effect partial but significant gene activation.

Site-directed mutagenesis was employed to make two single amino acid substitutions for highly conserved amino acid residues near the C-terminus of the 783-amino acid mouse glucocorticoid receptor. Substitution of leucine for histidine-781 caused little or no change in the concentration of dexamethasone required for half-maximal activation of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene expressed from a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. However, when phenylalanine-780 was changed to alanine, the half-maximal concentrations of various agonists were increased as follows, compared with the wild-type glucocorticoid receptor: triamcinolone acetonide by 7-fold, dexamethasone by 25-fold, and hydrocortisone and deoxycorticosterone by more than 150-fold. Binding of labeled steroids by the mutant receptor in vitro and in vivo was also decreased. In contrast, this mutation caused a small decrease in the concentration of RU486 required for antagonist or partial agonist activity. Thus, the phenyl group of phenylalanine-780 of the mouse glucocorticoid receptor is an important determinant of ligand binding affinity and specificity.

Progesterone receptors (PRs) recognize and bind to DNA in a sequence-specific manner. To define the sequence-specific determinants of PR binding to DNA, we employed a detailed series of target elements and analyzed both PR binding in vitro and PR-mediated activation of a reporter gene in vivo. These elements represent point substitution or insertion mutants of a progesterone response element derived from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV). Substitution of a G for the first T in the 15-base pair (bp) MMTV progesterone response element core sequence, GTTACAAACTGTTCT, increases PR-DNA binding in vitro. All other tested mutations within this sequence either had no effect or decreased PR binding. From these analyses, we infer an optimal PR recognition sequence, -7RGNACANRNTGTNCY+7, composed of hexameric half-sites separated by precisely 3 bp and exhibiting dyad symmetry. Limited substitution of a suboptimal base for an optimal base, as in the wild type MMTV element, can be tolerated, but further suboptimal substitutions significantly decrease binding by PR. The identity of 1 bp within the hexameric half-site, position +/- 5, is unconstrained. Transition mutations, but not transversions, are permitted at position +/- 7. Here the hydrogen bond acceptor of the N-7 position of the purine ring may be involved in receptor recognition, since this feature is shared by the permitted substitutions. Insertion of a single base pair between the half-sites abolishes detectable binding, suggesting that the spatial orientation of the DNA binding domains of the monomeric receptor subunits are fixed by dimerization of the receptor. This pattern of sequence-specific recognition parallels that previously inferred for the glucocorticoid receptor, indicating that the two receptors may be unable to distinguish individual target sites. Each of the mutant response elements was also assessed for its ability to confer progestin responsiveness to a truncated MMTV promoter when introduced into a PR-containing cell line. Elements exhibiting strong receptor binding in vitro were fully inducible, whereas poorly inducible or uninducible elements displayed little or no recognition by receptor in vitro. However, some elements, though poorly bound in vitro, still activated transcription in vivo in response to hormone. In certain cases activation was as good as that seen with the wild type element. Further examination of in vitro receptor binding by this class of mutant elements using higher levels of baculovirus-expressed receptor revealed that many were indeed recognized by receptor, albeit with a lower affinity than the wild type sequence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

We have prepared a monoclonal antibody, C-262, to a synthetic peptide that contains the carboxy-terminal 14 amino acids from progesterone receptors (PR). This sequence is 100% conserved in all species of PRs that have been cloned to date, suggesting that this antibody will recognize all mammalian and avian PR. The C-262 antibody recognizes both native and denatured forms of the receptor. However, it does not recognize PR when they are bound to the hormone agonists progesterone or R5020. Surprisingly the antibody does recognize PR when they are bound to the steroid antagonist RU486. This suggests that progestin agonists induce a conformational change in the receptor that occludes the C-262 epitope in the carboxyl-terminus, whereas unliganded receptors and receptors bound with RU486 assume distinct conformations that leaves the C-terminal tail accessible to the C-262 antibody.

In v-mos transformed cells, glucocorticoid receptor (GR) proteins that bind hormone agonist are not efficiently retained within nuclei and redistribute to the cytoplasmic compartment. These cytoplasmic desensitized receptors cannot be reutilized and may represent trapped intermediates derived from GR recycling. We have used the glucocorticoid antagonist RU486 to examine whether v-mos effects can be exerted on any ligand-bound GR. In the rat 6m2 cell line that expresses a temperature-sensitive p85gag-mos oncoprotein, RU486 is a complete antagonist and suppresses dexamethasone induction of metallothionein-1 mRNA at equimolar concentrations. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we observe efficient nuclear translocation of GR in response to RU486 treatment in either the presence or absence of v-mos oncoproteins. However, in contrast to the redistribution of agonist-bound nuclear receptors to the cytoplasm of v-mos-transformed cells, RU486-bound GRs are efficiently retained within nuclei. Interestingly, withdrawal of RU486 does not lead to efficient depletion of nuclear GR in either nontransformed or v-mos transformed cells. It is only after the addition of hormone agonist to RU486 withdrawn v-mos-transformed cells that GRs are depleted from nuclei and subsequently redistributed to the cytoplasm. Thus, only nuclear GRs that are agonist-bound and capable of modulating gene activity can be subsequently processed and recycled into the cytoplasm.

Structural and functional properties of human progesterone receptors (PR) bound with the antiprogestin, RU 486, and the progestin agonist, R5020, were compared in order to identify receptor mechanisms responsible for the inability of RU 486 to activate the transcriptional capacity of receptors. RU 486 interaction with human PR did not inhibit receptor transformation as assessed by dissociation of nontransformed 8-10S oligomeric receptors (in vitro and in vivo) and by tight binding of PR to nuclei/chromatin in whole cells. Assays based on immunoprecipitation of PR-DNA complexes with an antibody to human PR and gel retardation were used to analyze the effect of RU 486 on receptor binding to the hormone response element (HRE) of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV). RU 486 did not impair PR recognition of the MMTV HRE. Quantitative affinity constants and kinetic parameters of PR binding to these specific DNA sites were similar for receptors complexed with either agonist or antagonist. However, PR-RU 486 complexes exhibited an altered sedimentation rate on sucrose gradients and a faster mobility when bound to the MMTV HRE as assessed by gel retardation. These results indicate that human PR transformed by RU 486 exhibit no impairment in binding to specific DNA sites of target genes, but when bound to DNA assumes a structural form different from that of the receptor-agonist complexes to activate transcription results from this structural alteration in PR, which does not permit protein-protein interactions required for receptor-mediated induction of gene transcription.