Search

TRH is a neuropeptide with a variety of hormonal and neurotransmitter/neuromodulator functions. In particular, TRH has pronounced acute antidepressant effects in both humans and animals and has been implicated in the mediation of the effects of other antidepressive therapies. Two G protein-coupled receptors, TRH receptor 1 (TRH-R1) and TRH-R2, have been identified. Here we report the generation and phenotypic characterization of mice deficient in TRH-R1. The TRH-R1 knockout mice have central hypothyroidism and mild hyperglycemia but exhibit normal growth and development and normal body weight and food intake. Behaviorally, the TRH-R1 knockout mice display increased anxiety and depression levels while behaving normally in a number of other aspects examined. These results provide the first direct evidence that the endogenous TRH system is involved in mood regulation, and this function is carried out through TRH-R1-mediated neural pathways.

To provide an animal model of central hypothyroidism, mice deficient in the TRH-receptor 1 (TRH-R1) gene were generated by homologous recombination. The pituitaries of TRH-R1-/- mice are devoid of any TRH-binding capacity, demonstrating that TRH-R1 is the only receptor localized on TRH target cells of the pituitary. With the exception of some retardation in growth rate, TRH-R1-/- mice appear normal, but compared with control animals they exhibit a considerable decrease in serum T(3), T(4), and prolactin (PRL) levels but not in serum TSH levels. In situ hybridization histochemistry and real-time RT-PCR analysis revealed that in adult TRH-R1-/- animals TSHbeta-mRNA expression is not impaired whereas PRL mRNA and GH mRNA levels are considerably reduced compared with control mice. The numbers of thyrotropes, somatotropes, and lactotropes, however, are not affected by the deletion of the TRH-R1 gene. The mutant mice are fertile, and the dams nourish their pups well, indicating that TRH is not a decisive factor for suckling-induced PRL release. In situ hybridization and quantitative RT-PCR analysis, furthermore, revealed that, as in control animals, pituitary PRL-mRNA expression in TRH-R1-/- is considerably increased during lactation, albeit strongly reduced as compared with lactating control animals.

These studies were designed to characterize ubiquitination of the G protein-coupled TRH receptor (TRHR). TRHRs and ubiquitin coprecipitated with antibodies to either receptor or ubiquitin in Chinese hamster ovary or pituitary GHFT cells. Inhibition of the proteasome with MG-132 resulted in an accumulation of total TRHRs and the appearance of a small amount of cytosolic receptor. MG-132 caused an increase in newly synthesized receptors, detected by microscopy using a TRHR coupled to Timer, a DsRed that undergoes a spontaneous time-dependent color change. Misfolded TRHRs were particularly heavily ubiquitinated. These results show that the proteasome participates in TRHR quality control early after receptor synthesis. Under normal circumstances, most ubiquitinated TRHRs were absorbed to wheat germ agglutinin, indicating that they had undergone complex glycosylation in the Golgi apparatus. When cells were treated with tunicamycin to block glycosylation, a ladder of ubiquitinated species was detectable. Cell surface receptors, which were labeled selectively with either radioligand or antibody, showed no detectable ubiquitin modification. To determine if ubiqutination plays a role in TRH-induced receptor endocytosis, the receptor was expressed in Ts20 cells, which have a temperature-sensitive ubiquitin pathway. TRH induced a significant calcium response and rapid and extensive receptor internalization at both the permissive and nonpermissive temperatures, indicating that ligand-dependent ubiquitination of the receptor, or any other protein, is not necessary for TRHR signaling or internalization. These results show that ubiquitin modification targets misfolded receptors for degradation and suggest a possible role for ubiquitination in receptor trafficking.

To determine whether the interaction of the TRH receptor with beta-arrestin is necessary for TRH activation of MAPK, cells expressing either intact or truncated, internalization-defective TRH receptors were transfected with a beta-arrestin-green fluorescent protein conjugate. In cells expressing the wild-type pituitary TRH receptor, TRH caused translocation of the beta-arrestin-green fluorescent protein conjugate from the cytosol to the plasma membrane within 30 sec. After 5 min, the beta-arrestin-green fluorescent protein conjugate was visible in vesicles, where it colocalized with rhodamine-labeled TRH. In hypertonic sucrose, the beta-arrestin-green fluorescent protein conjugate translocated to the plasma membrane after TRH addition but did not internalize. In cells expressing the truncated TRH receptor, TRH did not cause translocation of the beta-arrestin-green fluorescent protein conjugate. TRH activated MAPK strongly in cells expressing intact or truncated TRH receptors, indicating that the receptor does not need to bind beta-arrestin or internalize. MAPK activation by TRH, epidermal growth factor, and phorbol ester was strongly inhibited by hypertonic sucrose and concanavalin A, which block movement of proteins into coated pits and coated pit assembly. Hypertonic sucrose did not affect MAPK activation in cells overexpressing MAPK kinase 1. Dominant negative dynamin, which blocks conversion of coated pits to vesicles, also reduced receptor internalization and TRH activation of MAPK. TRH activation of MAPK required PKC but was insensitive to pertussis toxin and did not require ras, epidermal growth factor receptor kinase, or PI3K. These results show that the TRH receptor itself does not need to bind beta-arrestin or undergo sequestration to activate MAPK but that the endocytic pathway must be intact.

TRH (thyroliberin) is a tripeptide (pGlu-His-ProNH2) that signals via G protein-coupled receptors. Until recently, only a single receptor for TRH was known (TRH-R1), but two groups identified a second receptor, TRH-R2. We independently discovered TRH-R2. Using an extensive set of TRH analogs, we found no differences in TRH-R1 and TRH-R2 binding or in acute stimulation of signaling. TRH-R2 was more rapidly internalized upon binding TRH and exhibited a greater level of TRH-induced down-regulation than TRH-R1. During prolonged exposure to TRH, cells expressing TRH-R2 exhibited a lower level of gene induction than cells expressing TRH-R1. TRH-R2 receptor mRNA was present in very discrete nuclei and regions of rat brain. A major mRNA transcript for TRH-R2 was seen in the cerebral cortex, pons, thalamus, hypothalamus, and midbrain with faint bands found in the striatum and pituitary. The extensive distribution of TRH-R2 in the brain suggests that it mediates many of the known functions of TRH that are not transduced by TRH-R1. The variations in agonist-induced internalization and down-regulation/desensitization, and anatomic distribution of TRH-R2 compared with TRH-R1, suggest important functional differences between the two receptors.

This study examined the dynamics of endocytotic and recycling events associated with the GnRH receptor, a unique G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) without the intracellular carboxyl-terminal tail, after agonist stimulation, and investigated the role of beta-arrestin in this process. Subcellular location of fluorescently labeled epitope-tagged GnRH receptors stably expressed in HEK 293 cells was monitored by confocal microscopy, and the receptor/ligand internalization process was quantified using radioligand binding and ELISA. Agonist stimulation resulted in reversible receptor redistribution from the plasma membrane into the cytoplasmic compartment, and colocalization of internalized GnRH receptors with transferrin receptors was observed. Internalization experiments for the GnRH receptor and another GPCR possessing a carboxy-terminal tail, the TRH receptor, showed that the rate of internalization for the GnRH receptor was much slower than for the TRH receptor when expressed in both HEK 293 and COS-7 cells. TRH receptor internalization could be substantially increased by coexpression with beta-arrestin in COS-7 cells, while GnRH receptor internalization was not affected by coexpression with beta-arrestin in either cell type. Coexpression of the GnRH receptor with the dominant negative beta-arrestin (319-418) mutant did not affect its ability to internalize, and activated GnRH receptors did not induce time-dependent redistribution of beta-arrestin/green fluorescent protein to the plasma membrane. However, the beta-arrestin mutant impaired the internalization of the TRH receptor, and activated TRH receptors induced the beta-arrestin/green fluorescent protein translocation. This study demonstrates that, despite having no intracellular carboxy-terminal tail, the GnRH receptor undergoes agonist-stimulated internalization displaying distinctive characteristics described for other GPCRs that internalize via a clathrin-dependent mechanism and recycle through an acidified endosomal compartment. However, our data indicate that the GnRH receptor may utilize a beta-arrestin-independent endocytotic pathway.

The role of putative extracellular sequences for ligand binding in the TRH receptor was examined using deletion or substitution mutations. Each mutant receptor was transiently expressed in TRH receptor-minus GH(1)2C(1)b rat pituitary cells, and binding of 4 Nu Mu [3H]pGlu-N(tau)-MeHis-Pro-NH2 ([3H] MeTRH) was measured. When binding was not detected, signal transduction at 10 microM MeTRH was measured to assess receptor expression. Deletion of most of the N-terminal sequences (Glu(2)-Leu(22)), including two potential glycosylation sites, had no effect on the affinity of the receptor for MeTRH. Segmental deletions or simultaneous substitution of multiple amino acid residues in the first, second, or third extracellular loop (EL1, EL2, or EL3) resulted, however, in total loss of [3H]MeTRH binding, suggesting important roles for the loop sequences in either receptor expression or ligand binding. Individual substitutions were made to test further the role of the specific extracellular loop sequences in TRH binding. In EL1, conversion of Tyr93 to Ala resulted in more than 20-fold decrease in affinity for MeTRH. In EL2 and the top portion of the fifth transmembrane helix, conversion of Tyr181 to Phe, Tyr188 to Ala, and Phe199 to Ala resulted in a large ( > 100-fold) decrease in affinity for MeTRH, and conversion of Tyr 188 to Phe and Phe196 to Ala caused an agonist-specific 4- to 5-fold decrease in affinity. In EL3, conversion of Asn289 to Ala and of Ser290 to Ala caused a large ( > 100-fold) decrease in affinity for MeTRH. These results suggest important roles for the extracellular loops in high affinity TRH binding and lead us to propose a model in which TRH binds to the extra-cellular domain of its receptor.

A carboxyl-terminus truncated mutant of the guanine nucleotide-binding (G) protein-coupled TRH receptor (TRH-R) was previously shown to exhibit constitutive, i.e. TRH-independent, activity (C335Stop TRH-R). Chlordiazepoxide (CDE), a known competitive inhibitor of TRH binding to wild-type (WT) TRH-Rs, is shown to compete for binding to C335Stop TRH-Rs also. More importantly, CDE is shown to be a negative antagonist of C335Stop TRH-Rs. CDE rapidly caused the basal rate of inositol phosphate second messenger (IP) formation to decrease in AtT-20 pituitary cells stably expressing C335Stop TRH-Rs (AtT-C335Stop cells), but not in cells expressing WT TRH-Rs (AtT-WT cells). Similar observations were made in HeLa cells transiently expressing C335Stop or WT TRH-Rs. CDE inhibition of IP formation was shown to be specific for TRH-Rs using GH4C1 cells expressing both TRH-Rs and receptors for bombesin. In these cells, CDE inhibited TRH-stimulated IP formation, but had no effect on bombesin-stimulated IP formation. The effects of chronic administration of CDE were studied. Preincubation of AtT-C335Stop cells, but not AtT-WT cells, with CDE for several hours caused an increase in cell surface receptor number (up-regulation) that led to increased TRH stimulation of inositol phosphate formation and elevation of intracellular free Ca2+. Preincubation with CDE did not affect methyl-TRH binding affinity or TRH potency in cells expressing AtT-C335Stop or in AtT-WT cells. We conclude that CDE is a negative antagonist of C335Stop TRH-Rs and that constitutively active C335Stop TRH-Rs are down-regulated in AtT-20 pituitary cells in the absence of agonist.