Search

Sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) recognize motifs of related nucleotide sequences at their DNA binding sites. Upon binding at these sites, TFs regulate critical molecular processes such as gene expression. It is widely assumed that a TF recognizes a single "canonical" motif, although recent studies have identified additional "non-canonical" motifs for some TFs. A comprehensive approach to identify non-canonical DNA binding motifs and the functional importance of those motifs' matches in the human genome is necessary for fully understanding the mechanisms of TF-regulated molecular processes in human cells. To address this need, we developed a statistical pipeline for in vitro HT-SELEX data that identifies and characterizes the distributions of non-canonical TF motifs in a stringent manner. Analyzing ~170 human TFs' HT-SELEX data, we found non-canonical motifs for 19 TFs (11%). These non-canonical motifs occur independently of the TFs' canonical motifs. Non-canonical motif occurrences in the human genome show similar evolutionary conservation to canonical motif occurrences, explain TF binding in locations without canonical motifs, and occur within gene promoters and epigenetically marked regulatory sequences in human cell lines and tissues. Our approach and collection of non-canonical motifs expand current understanding of functionally relevant DNA binding sites for human TFs.

DNA shape adds specificity to sequence motifs but has not been explored systematically outside this context. We hypothesized that DNA-binding proteins (DBPs) preferentially occupy DNA with specific structures ("shape motifs") regardless of whether or not these correspond to high information content sequence motifs. We present ShapeMF, a Gibbs sampling algorithm that identifies de novo shape motifs. Using binding data from hundreds of in vivo and in vitro experiments, we show that most DBPs have shape motifs and can occupy these in the absence of sequence motifs. This "shape-only binding" is common for many DBPs and in regions co-bound by multiple DBPs. When shape and sequence motifs co-occur, they can be overlapping, flanking, or separated by consistent spacing. Finally, DBPs within the same protein family have different shape motifs, explaining their distinct genome-wide occupancy despite having similar sequence motifs. These results suggest that shape motifs not only complement sequence motifs but also facilitate recognition of DNA beyond conventionally defined sequence motifs.

Computational models of enhancer function generally assume that transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory effects independently, modeling an enhancer as a "bag of sites." These models fail on endogenous loci that harbor multiple enhancers, and a "two-tier" model appears better suited: in each enhancer TFs work independently, and the total expression is a weighted sum of their expression readouts. Here, we test these two opposing views on how cis-regulatory information is integrated. We fused two Drosophila blastoderm enhancers, measured their readouts, and applied the above two models to these data. The two-tier mechanism better fits these readouts, suggesting that these fused enhancers comprise multiple independent modules, despite having sequence characteristics typical of single enhancers. We show that short-range TF-TF interactions are not sufficient to designate such modules, suggesting unknown underlying mechanisms. Our results underscore that mechanisms of how modules are defined and how their outputs are combined remain to be elucidated.