Search

ObjectiveTo assess the relationship of adherence and pregnancy in participants using an estetrol and drospirenone combined oral contraceptive.MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis for which we pooled data from two parallel, multicenter, phase 3 trials (United States and Canada, Europe and Russia) that enrolled participants 16-50 years of age to receive estetrol 15 mg and drospirenone 3 mg in a 24 hormone and four placebo pills regimen for up to 13 cycles. Participants reported pill intake, sexual intercourse, and other contraceptive use on paper diaries. We limited this efficacy analysis to at-risk cycles (one or more reported acts of intercourse and no other contraceptive use) in participants 16-35 years of age at screening. We excluded cycles with other contraceptive use unless pregnancy occurred in that cycle. We assessed primarily the relationship between number of pills not taken per cycle and pregnancies and, secondarily, when pregnancies occurred during product use with a test for trend and χ 2 analyses as appropriate.ResultsAmong 2,837 participants in this analysis, 31 on-treatment pregnancies occurred during 26,455 at-risk cycles. Pregnancies occurred in 0.09%, 0.25%, 0.83%, and 1.6% of cycles in which participants reported they took all hormone pills (n=25,613 cycles) or did not take one (n=405 cycles), two (n=121 cycles), and more than two (n=314 cycles) hormone-containing pills, respectively ( P

ObjectiveTo describe experiences with abortion counseling and access in patients with lethal or life-limiting fetal diagnoses in Texas after enactment of Senate Bill 8 (SB8).MethodsIn this qualitative study, we interviewed patients who obtained abortions after enactment of SB8, using semi-structured interviews to explore how restrictions affected abortion care. Two researchers coded all transcripts using an inductive technique and analyzed themes in an iterative approach.ResultsWe interviewed 16 participants who reported gestational durations from 13 to 29 weeks at the time of abortion. Participants described loss of the therapeutic patient-physician relationship and feelings of isolation while pursuing abortion due to the limitations imposed by SB8. For example, participants felt there was a physician "gag rule" regarding abortion ("the unspoken word of termination"), resulting in the need to find information about pregnancy options outside of the medical community and further highlighting the privilege of financial resources necessary to obtain an abortion on their own. Participants also expressed fears regarding confidentiality with their support systems and clinicians ("I would joke around and say, well don't sue me, but halfway mean it") and personal safety when self-referring for abortion ("…am I making the right choice on where I need to go? Is it safe?").ConclusionAbortion restrictions and bans such as SB8 erode the patient-physician relationship, evoking fear and safety concerns during a vulnerable time for those undergoing abortion for lethal or life-limiting fetal diagnoses. They force patients to shoulder the significant burden of understanding pregnancy options and navigating the process of abortion alone, which is likely to have greater effects on those with fewer resources.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the bleeding patterns of a new combined oral contraceptive containing estetrol (E4) 15 mg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg in a 24/4-day regimen.Study designWe pooled bleeding data from two parallel, open-label, 13-cycle phase 3 trials that enrolled participants 16 to 50 years old with body mass index (BMI) ≤35 kg/m2. Participants reported vaginal bleeding/spotting in daily diaries. For this bleeding analysis, we included participants with at least one evaluable cycle. We calculated mean frequencies of scheduled and unscheduled bleeding/spotting episodes and median duration of bleeding/spotting episodes, and assessed associations between treatment compliance, BMI and recent hormonal contraceptive use on bleeding/spotting outcomes.ResultsWe included 3409 participants with 33,815 cycles. Scheduled bleeding/spotting occurred in 87.2% to 90.4% of participants/cycle, with a median duration of 4 to 5 days. Unscheduled bleeding/spotting decreased from 27.1% in Cycle 1 to 20.6% in Cycle 2 to ≤17.5% from Cycle 5 onwards. Most (66.5%) unscheduled bleeding/spotting episodes were spotting-only. Between 5.8% and 7.8% of users/cycle experienced absence of any scheduled or unscheduled bleeding/spotting. Missing one or more active pills resulted in a higher occurrence of unscheduled bleeding/spotting (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.13 [95% confidence interval 1.68-2.70]) and absence of scheduled bleeding/spotting (aOR 2.36 [1.82-3.07]). Participants with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 reported more absence of scheduled bleeding/spotting (aOR 1.68 [1.37-2.05]). Switchers and starters reported similar frequencies of unscheduled bleeding/spotting (aOR 0.94 [0.83-1.07]) and absence of scheduled bleeding/spotting (aOR 1.00 [0.85-1.19]). Three percent of participants discontinued for a bleeding-related adverse event.ConclusionE4/DRSP use results in a predictable bleeding pattern with limited unscheduled bleeding/spotting. Noncompliance and BMI affect bleeding patterns.Implications statementMost estetrol/drospirenone users experience a predictable and regular bleeding pattern. Providers can educate patients about the expected bleeding patterns and should advise users that they may infrequently experience no scheduled bleeding/spotting. This information may improve user acceptability and continuation of this new oral contraceptive.

BackgroundPostpartum contraception counseling and method use vary widely among patients who had a preterm birth. We performed this study to explore what issues and concerns individuals with preterm infants requiring intensive care describe as influencing their postpartum contraceptive choices.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with participants who gave birth to a singleton preterm infant admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We explored pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum care, and NICU experiences, as well as future reproductive plans and postpartum contraceptive choices. Two coders used a constant-comparative approach to code transcripts and identify themes.ResultsWe interviewed 26 participants: 4 (15%) gave birth at less than 26, 6 (23%) at 26 to 27 6/7, 8 (31%) at 28 to 31 6/7, and 8 (31%) at 32 to 36 6/7weeks of gestation. We identified three main themes related to future pregnancy plans and contraception choice. First, participants frequently described their preterm birth and their infants' NICU hospitalization as traumatic experiences that affected plans for future pregnancies. The loss of control in predicting or preventing a future preterm birth and uncertainty about their premature child's future medical needs resulted in participants wanting to avoid going through the same experience with another child. Second, participants chose contraception based on previous personal experiences, desired method features, and advice from others. Last, having a preterm birth did not result in any ambivalence among those who desired permanent contraception.ConclusionsPreterm birth influences future pregnancy plans. When discussing reproductive goals with patients, clinicians should be aware of potential trauma associated with a premature birth, assess for whether patients want to discuss contraception, and center the conversation around individual needs if patients do desire contraceptive counseling.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the cervical mucus effects of a norgestrel 0.075 mg progestin-only contraceptive pill over a 28-day cycle.Study designWe recruited persons ages 18 to 35 with normal cycles at 2 US academic medical centers. Participants took norgestrel 0.075 mg daily for 28 days at the same time (within a 3 hour window) daily, recorded through a text-message based e-diary. We extracted cervical mucus using a standardized aspiration technique on the day of pill initiation and then at least every 3 to 4 days over the cycle. We monitored subjects for follicular activity with transvaginal ultrasound examination and blood sampling for ovarian hormones and gonadotropins at each visit. We assessed cervical mucus scoring using a 4-category/12-point modified Insler scale (score ≥9 [favoring fertility], 5-8 [intermediate], and ≤4 [unfavorable to fertility]). We stratified cervical mucus scores by serum estradiol levels and ovulatory status based on a modified Hoogland score.ResultsExcluding enrollment, we collected and evaluated 413 mucus samples from 51 participants. Participants had a median mucus score of 0 (Interquartile Range 0, 2); most had scores ≤4 (samples=385, 93%) and none had a score ≥9 favoring fertility. Seventeen (33%) participants ovulated, of which 14 (82%) had unfavorable mucus scores (≤4) at the time of ovulation and 3 (18%) had intermediate scores (5-8).ConclusionsNorgestrel 0.075 mg daily prevents mucus changes that favor fertility, even during ovulatory cycles.ImplicationsDaily administration of norgestrel 0.075 mg over an initial 28-day cycle did not result in fertile cervical mucus. Although approximately one-third of users ovulated in this first cycle of pill use, contraceptive efficacy may be maintained by mucus effects.

Objectives To assess referral center outcomes with removal of difficult or nonpalpable contraceptive implants using high-frequency point-of-care ultrasonography. Study Design We present a case series examining patients referred to our specialty center from January 2019 through September 2020 for difficult or nonpalpable implant removal. Results Of the 54 referrals, 6 had palpable implants and 48 required ultrasonography. We localized 46 (96%) implants in-office, including 13 located subfascially; 2 Implanon implants could not be localized. We successfully completed 50 (96%) of 52 attempted in-office removals, including 12 (92%) subfascial implants. Conclusion High-frequency point-of-care ultrasonography can effectively localize nonpalpable contraceptive implants leading to successful in-office removal. Implications Specialists can use high-frequency point-of-care ultrasonography to localize nonpalpable implants without formal radiology scans and skilled technologists, optimizing patient time and convenience. However, the probe is expensive, and providers may need to consider this cost in the context of reimbursement for these highly specialized procedures.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the proportion of 12-month contraceptive pill, patch, and ring prescriptions before and after an institution-wide change of default electronic medical record facility orders to dispensing 12-month supply.Study designThis retrospective pre-post study compares outpatient contraception prescriptions from August 10, 2019 through April 9, 2020 obtained from our institutional electronic medical record prescription database. On December 10, 2019, we facilitated a change in the default orders for dispensing self-administered hormonal contraceptives from one-month to 12-months. We evaluated the primary outcome of 12-month supply prescriptions during the four months before and after the change. We also compared 12-month supply prescriptions for pills, patch, and ring by prescriber specialty and location.ResultsThe dataset included 4897 distinct evaluable prescriptions for the pill, patch, or ring, with an overall increase in 12-month prescriptions from 260/2437 (10.7%) to 669/2460 (27.2%) after the order change (p&nbsp

ObjectiveTo evaluate serum estradiol (E2) concentrations during use of 90-day contraceptive vaginal rings releasing E2 75, 100, or 200mcg/day and segesterone acetate (SA) 200mcg/day to identify a dose that avoids hypoestrogenism.Study designWe conducted a multicenter dose-finding study in healthy, reproductive-aged women with regular cycles with sequential enrollment to increasing E2 dose groups. We evaluated serum E2 concentrations twice weekly for the primary outcome of median E2 concentrations throughout initial 30-day use (target ≥40pg/mL). In an optional 2-cycle extension substudy, we randomized participants to 2- or 4-day ring-free intervals per 30-day cycle to evaluate bleeding and spotting based on daily diary information.ResultsSixty-five participants enrolled in E2 75 (n=22), 100 (n=21), and 200 (n=22)mcg/day groups; 35 participated in the substudy. Median serum E2 concentrations in 75 and 100mcg/day groups were 40pg/mL throughout 30days; E2 concentrations were 37pg/mL (range 28-62pg/mL) on days 88-90 (n=11). Among the E2 200mcg/day substudy participants, all had withdrawal bleeding following ring removal. The 2-day ring-free interval group reported zero median unscheduled bleeding and two (range 0-16) and three (range 0-19) unscheduled spotting days in extension cycles 1 and 2, respectively. The 4-day ring-free interval group reported zero median unscheduled bleeding or spotting days.ConclusionsEstradiol concentrations with rings releasing E2 200mcg/day and SA 200mcg/day avoid hypoestrogenism over 30-day use.ImplicationsA 90-day contraceptive vaginal ring releasing estradiol 200mcg/day and segesterone acetate 200mcg/day achieves estradiol concentrations that should avoid hypoestrogenism and effectively suppresses ovulation.

Author(s): Creinin, Mitchell D; Hou, Melody Y; Dalton, Laura; Steward, Rachel; Chen, Melissa J | Abstract: ObjectiveTo estimate the efficacy and safety of mifepristone antagonization with high-dose oral progesterone.MethodsWe planned to enroll 40 patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. We enrolled patients at 44-63 days of gestation with ultrasound-confirmed gestational cardiac activity who were planning surgical abortion. Participants ingested mifepristone 200 mg and initiated oral progesterone 400 mg or placebo 24 hours later twice daily for 3 days, then once daily until their planned surgical abortion 14-16 days after enrollment. Follow-up visits were scheduled 3±1, 7±1, and 15±1 days after mifepristone intake with ultrasonography and blood testing for human chorionic gonadotropin and progesterone. Participants exited from the study when they had their surgical abortion or earlier for gestational cardiac activity absence, gestational sac expulsion, or medically indicated suction aspiration. We assessed the primary outcome of continued gestational cardiac activity at approximately 2 weeks (15±1 day), side effects after drug ingestion, and safety outcomes including hemorrhage and emergent treatment.ResultsWe enrolled participants from February to July 2019 and stopped enrollment after 12 patients for safety concerns. Mean gestational age was 52.5 days. Two (one per group) voluntarily discontinued 3 days after mifepristone ingestion for subjective symptoms (nausea and vomiting, bleeding). Among the remaining 10 patients (five per group), gestational cardiac activity continued for 2 weeks in four in the progesterone group and two in the placebo group. One patient in the placebo group had no gestational cardiac activity 3 days after mifepristone use. Severe hemorrhage requiring ambulance transport to hospital occurred in three patients; one received progesterone (complete expulsion, no aspiration) and two received placebo (aspiration for both, one required transfusion). We halted enrollment after the third hemorrhage. No other significant side effects were reported.ConclusionWe could not estimate the efficacy of progesterone for mifepristone antagonization due to safety concerns when mifepristone is administered without subsequent prostaglandin analogue treatment. Patients in early pregnancy who use only mifepristone may be at high risk of significant hemorrhage.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03774745.

ObjectiveTo evaluate if gabapentin 600 mg reduces pain after osmotic dilator placement the day before a dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure.Study designWe conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (stratified by vaginal parity) trial among women undergoing osmotic dilator placement before D&E at 15-23 5/7 weeks gestation. Subjects received gabapentin 600 mg or placebo 30 min before dilator placement, with re-dosing 8 h later. We assessed pain after dilator placement using a numeric rating scale (NRS; scale 0-10) at 5 min, 2, 4, and 8 h, and at presentation for D&E. The primary outcome was median NRS pain score change from baseline to 8 h after dilator placement. Secondary outcomes included gabapentin-related side effects and analgesic use.ResultsOf 121 randomized women, we excluded three subjects (allergic reaction [placebo], randomization error, no NRS data), leaving 60 gabapentin and 58 placebo subjects. Of 110 (93%) women who provided 8-hour data, median pain score changes from baseline did not differ between gabapentin and placebo groups overall (2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.52), in vaginally nulliparous women (2 vs. 4, p = 0.10) or in parous women (2 vs. 1.5, p = 0.37). We found no statistically significant differences in median pain score change from baseline to any timepoint overall or when stratified by parity. Beginning at 2 h after dilator placement, more gabapentin than placebo users experienced dizziness (29/53[55%] vs. 11/53[21%], p = 0.001) and tiredness (34/54[63%] vs. 17/54[31%], p = 0.002). The proportion of women using narcotics did not differ between gabapentin (35/60[58%]) or placebo (40/58[69%]) users (p = 0.26).ConclusionsGabapentin does not reduce pain with overnight osmotic dilator placement prior to D&E and causes drug-related side effects.Implications statementWomen experience pain, mostly mild to moderate, with overnight cervical dilator placement at 15-23 5/7 weeks gestation. About 2/3 of women will use a limited quantity of narcotics if provided. Gabapentin does not decrease the pain with or following dilator placement and does not decrease narcotic use.

Persistent trophoblast after ectopic pregnancy has been demonstrated at the surgical site or as peritoneal implants. A 37-year-old woman (G5P2) experienced persistently low levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) after surgical treatment for an interstitial pregnancy. Evaluation for persistent trophoblast, gestational trophoblastic neoplasm and heterophilic antibodies was negative. After 15 months without resolution, she elected for hysterectomy. We found four smooth, freely floating avascular cysts intraoperatively; pathological evaluation identified the cysts as trophoblastic tissue. Serum beta-hCG resolved postoperatively and remained negative at 1 year. Our case demonstrates the novel finding of trophoblastic tissue existing as free-floating cysts in the peritoneal cavity. With appropriate suspicion, these cysts can be identified on radiologic investigation and removed laparoscopically.

Objective To evaluate whether scheduling a 2- to 3-week versus 6-week postpartum visit results in higher visit attendance. Study Design We conducted a secondary analysis of a quasi-experimental before–after study to compare postpartum visit attendance after changing routine scheduling of visits from 6 weeks to 2 to 3 weeks after delivery. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction and breastfeeding continuation at 3 and 6 months postpartum. We collected postpartum visit information through a chart review and conducted telephonic interviews at 3 and 6 months postpartum to assess satisfaction with visit timing and breastfeeding status. We performed multivariable analyses to assess predictors of visit attendance. Results Women scheduled at 2 to 3 weeks postpartum demonstrated higher visit attendance (90.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.6–93.9%) compared with 6 weeks (81.6%; 95% CI: 76.3–86.2%; p Conclusion Scheduling a 2- to 3-week postpartum visit is associated with higher attendance.

© 2018 Objective: We evaluated a novel concept of initiating the etonogestrel implant as a “back-up” method in women who desire using combined oral contraceptives (COC) but want to decrease their risk of unintended pregnancy with a more effective method. Study Design: In this prospective cohort study, we planned to include 20 women as a proof-of-concept. We enrolled both new COC starters and continuing COC users and placed an etonogestrel implant. Participants completed daily bleeding diaries and attended follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months. We assessed implant continuation through six months of study participation and side effects with dual hormonal contraceptive use. Results: Between September and December 2016, we enrolled 10 new starters and 10 current COC users. All participants completed 1-month follow-up, and 18 (90%) subjects completed the 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Two current COC users had the implant removed for mood changes before 6 months. At the 6-month follow-up visit, 10 women were using both pills and implant, seven relied on the implant only, and one was using a COC only. Three new starters chose implant removal at end of study participation; one for weight gain and acne, another for mood changes, and one for decreased libido. No subjects discontinued the implant for bleeding complaints. Conclusion: In this proof-of-concept study, women using COCs were willing to initiate the implant as a “back-up” method to improve pregnancy prevention. Most women continued the implant through 6 months and after completing study participation. Implications: Initiating the etonogestrel implant as a “back-up” method may be an option for women who desire more effective pregnancy prevention while using combined oral contraceptive pills for its bleeding profile or non-contraceptive benefits.

ObjectiveTo estimate whether postpartum visit attendance was improved in women exposed to a postpartum patient navigation program compared with those who received care immediately before the program's initiation and to assess whether other postpartum health behaviors improved during the intervention period.MethodsThis is a prospective observational study of women enrolled in a patient navigation program compared with women receiving care before the program. Navigating New Motherhood was a postpartum patient navigation program for adult, English-speaking women receiving prenatal care at a Medicaid-based university clinic. In 2015, Navigating New Motherhood introduced a clinic-level change in which a navigator was hired and assumed supportive and logistic responsibilities for enrolled patients between delivery and postpartum visit completion. We compared medical record data from women who enrolled in Navigating New Motherhood with those of women receiving care in the same clinic for 1 year immediately before Navigating New Motherhood. The primary outcome was postpartum visit attendance. Secondary outcomes included World Health Organization (WHO) Tier 1 or 2 contraception uptake and other health services measures. We conducted bivariable and multivariable analyses.ResultsOf the 225 women approached for Navigating New Motherhood participation after program initiation, 96.9% (n=218) enrolled; these women were compared with 256 women in the historical cohort. Most women in both groups were racial or ethnic minorities and all had Medicaid insurance. There were no important differences in demographic, clinical, or health service characteristics between groups, although women in Navigating New Motherhood were more likely to transfer into the clinic for prenatal care and to deliver neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. The primary outcome, return for postpartum care, was more common among women in Navigating New Motherhood (88.1% compared with 70.3%, P

The revised 2015 World Health Organization guidance expanded the recommended contraceptive options available to breastfeeding women during the early postpartum period to include progestogen-only pills and implants, but a substantial number of surveyed country representatives indicated that as yet their national policies did not allow such women to use these methods at that time. Countries may benefit from support to incorporate MEC guidance into national service delivery guidelines., Given recent updates to the postpartum contraception recommendations in the fifth edition of the Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (MEC), published by the World Health Organization (WHO), the purpose of this qualitative study was to assess the extent to which national family planning policies in sub-Saharan African countries are in agreement with the WHO MEC, particularly with regard to postpartum contraceptive use. WHO headquarters sent questionnaires to country-level focal points to complete with their Ministry of Health counterparts. Between February and May 2016, 23 of 32 (72%) surveys were completed. All respondents reported that their countries had used the MEC document in the past, with most reporting that they had used the guidance as a reference (n = 20, 87%), for training purposes (n = 19, 83%), to change clinical practices (n = 17, 74%), and to develop national policies (n = 16, 70%). While many respondents (16, 70%) indicated their countries already include immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion among breastfeeding women in their family planning policies, few reported currently allowing use of progestogen-only pills (n = 8, 35%) or implants (n = 8, 35%) during the immediate postpartum period (i.e., less than 48 hours after delivery) for breastfeeding women. A higher percentage of respondents indicated their countries allowed breastfeeding women the option of progestogen-only pills (n = 16, 70%) and implants (n = 13, 57%) between 48 hours and 6 weeks postpartum. Findings from this baseline assessment suggest that many countries may benefit from training and policy formulation support to adapt both new WHO MEC updates as well as existing recommendations from previous MEC revisions into national family planning guidelines.

Objectives Compare proportion lost to follow-up, successful abortion, and staff effort in women who choose office or telephone-based follow-up evaluation for medical abortion at a teaching institution. Study design We performed a chart review of all medical abortions provided in the first three years of service provision. Women receiving mifepristone and misoprostol could choose office follow-up with an ultrasound evaluation one to two weeks after mifepristone or telephone follow-up with a scheduled telephone interview at one week post abortion and a second telephone call at four weeks to review the results of a home urine pregnancy test. Results Of the 176 medical abortion patients, 105 (59.7%) chose office follow-up and 71 (40.3%) chose telephone follow-up. Office evaluation patients had higher rates of completing all required follow-up compared to telephone follow-up patients (94.3% vs 84.5%, respectively, p = .04), but proportion lost to follow-up was similar in both groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, respectively, p = 1.0). Medical abortion efficacy was 94.0% and 92.5% in women who chose office and telephone follow-up, respectively. We detected two (1.2%) ongoing pregnancies, both in the office group. Staff rescheduled 15.0% of appointments in the office group. For the telephone follow-up cohort, staff made more than one phone call to 43.9% and 69.4% of women at one week and four weeks, respectively. Conclusions Proportion lost to follow-up is low in women who have the option of office or telephone follow-up after medical abortion. Women who choose telephone-based evaluation compared to office follow-up may require more staff effort for rescheduling of contact, but overall outcomes are similar. Implications Although women who choose telephone evaluation may require more rescheduling of contact as compared to office follow-up, having alternative follow-up options may decrease the proportion of women who are lost to follow-up.

Contraception 94 (2016) 97 – 103 Commentary Medical abortion reporting of efficacy: the MARE guidelines ☆,☆☆ Mitchell D. Creinin ⁎ , Melissa J. Chen Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA Received 20 April 2016; accepted 22 April 2016 1. Introduction This commentary introduces the Medical Abortion Reporting of Efficacy (MARE) guidelines as a supplement to CONSORT [1] and STROBE [2]. The goal of the recommendations is to standardize early medical abortion efficacy reporting to facilitate comparison of outcomes between studies and to enrich the ability for data synthesis from different studies to create evidence-based guidelines. Although the term medical abortion had most commonly referred to the use of abortion-inducing medication for early pregnancy termination without primary surgical intervention, more recently, the phrase has been used to refer to labor induction abortions as well [3,4]. Accordingly, we consider early medical abortion to refer to procedures in the first trimester. Reports of using medical agents to cause early abortion first appeared in the 1950s [5], but the modern era of medical abortion research started in the early 1980s with the discovery of test agents that were ultimately developed into mifepristone. Over the past 30 years, research has evolved, with the use of various drugs including mifepristone, methotrexate, tamoxifen, letrozole and various prostaglandin analogs to induce early abortion [6]. The first drug with a labeled indication for medical abortion, mifepristone, was initially approved in China and France more than two decades ago. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved mifepristone in 2000 for use in combination with the prostaglandin analog misoprostol for abortion through 49 days gestation. Funding: none. Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Chen has no conflicts of interest. Dr. Creinin is a consultant to Danco. ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-916-734-6670. E-mail address: mdcreinin@ucdavis.edu (M.D. Creinin). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.013 0010-7824/© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Over the more than 25 years since mifepristone first became available for women to obtain a medical abortion, researchers have continued to evaluate alternative regimens to improve efficacy and the patient experience. Professional and national organizations now lead the way in promoting the best science by providing evidence-based recommendations for the preferred medical abortion treatment options [6–8]. Although many individual studies are methodologically strong, the heterogeneity of design, conduct and reporting hinders synthesis of data from multiple studies. Importantly, many studies do not stratify outcomes by week of gestation. These issues became evident during data collation for creation of the 2014 Medical Management of First Trimester Abortion Practice Bulletin written collaboratively by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society of Family Planning [6,7]. More recently, a systematic review including approximately 30,000 patients who received mifepristone and buccal misoprostol found that only 57% had data identifying week of gestation for a stratified evaluation of overall efficacy; only 51% had such information for evaluation of continuing pregnancy [9]. Well-performed and reported research trials provide the basis for evidence-based guidelines and do more than simply inform providers and patients about more cost-effective or therapeutically effective options — they also affect access to care. Methodologically strong research can counter ideologi- cally motivated arguments for legal restrictions on medical abortion regimens and gestational age limits. The medical community can use this evidence to oppose such legislation. Future synthesis of the large body of available data to inform patient care and regulatory policy can be facilitated with the use of guidelines to ensure that publications of original data are presented in a standardized way. We herein present reporting recommendations for early medical abortion as a supplement to the CONSORT guidelines (for

Author(s): Chen, Melissa J; Kennedy, Jeffrey; Melo, Juliana; Hou, Melody; Creinin, Mitchell D; Cansino, Catherine

S / Contraception 92 (2015) 359–414 Objectives: To evaluate the impact of doulas on patients' physical and psychological distress levels during surgical management of first-trimester undesired or failed pregnancy under local anesthesia. Methods: Women were randomized to receive doula support or routine care during office manual vacuum aspiration (MVA). The primary outcome was pain score measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, validated psychometric scores and women's sense of personal empowerment postprocedurally. Data were collected prior to, immediately following and 1 month following the procedure. Results: The sample consisted of 70 women. While levels of reported pain did not differ between the doula and control groups (70.7±24.5 mm vs. 59.7±32.5 mm, p=.11, respectively), women who received doula support experienced a statistically significant decrease in postprocedure anxiety after we controlled for baseline anxiety (OR, − 11.6; 95% CI, − 22.9 to − 0.2; p= .04). Relief was the most common emotion reported by 60% of women in both groups, regardless of procedure indication. There was no significant difference between groups regarding satisfaction with the procedure (86.2%±23.4 vs. 93.4%±13.5, p=.12), a sense of empowerment (0.11%± 0.31 vs. 0.12%±0.30, p=.93) and perceived ability to cope following the procedure (36.3%±28.1 vs. 42.0%±27.1, p=.39). Of women who received doula support, 97% reported that this was beneficial and that they would recommend a doula to other women having such a procedure. Outcomes: Doula support during office MVA for undesired or failed pregnancies is well received and may address unmet psychosocial needs of women undergoing this procedure. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.044 O16 Determining the accuracy of gestational dating among women presenting for an abortion in Ghana Shellenberg K Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Antobam S, Edelman A, Griffin R, Voetagbe G Objectives: Our objective was to determine the proportion of women presenting for an abortion in Ghana who could accurately determine whether their pregnancy was less than 13 or 13 weeks or more using a gestational wheel. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among women attending four facilities in Ghana. Interviewers administered the questionnaire, and women were then seen by a provider who assessed gestational age via bimanual exam. We present descriptive statistics for women's recall of last menstrual period and use of the wheel. Using the providers' clinical dating as a reference, we calculated the proportion of participants who accurately determined whether their pregnancy was less than 13 or 13 weeks or more using a gestational wheel. Results: Our sample consisted of 780 women (participation rate was 98%). Twenty-eight percent of respondents used the wheel without verbal instructions. The other 72% were given instructions after trying to complete the task on their own. Sixty percent said the wheel was easy to use. Overall agreement for gestational age between women and providers was 95% (94% agreement for gestational age less than 13 weeks, 1% agreement for gestational age 13 weeks or more). The remainder of women fell into a “low risk disagreement group” and a “high risk disagreement group,” 1% and 4%, respectively. Outcomes: Almost all women were able to use a gestational wheel to date their pregnancy. This simple tool may aid women in the safe use of medication for abortion and therefore decrease morbidity and mortality from unsafe abortion. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.045 O17 University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA Rounds K, Creinin MD, Hou MY Objectives: We compared follow-up rates, completed abortion and staff utilization among women choosing office or telephone follow-up after medical abortion. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of women who had a medical abortion in our office between August 2012 and August 2014. Women chose office or telephone follow-up. Office follow-up involved an ultrasound exam 1–2 weeks after treatment. Telephone follow-up was a standardized interview 1 week after treatment and a urine pregnancy test 30 days after mifepristone. Results: Of 132 medical abortion patients, we excluded seven who were repeat patients. Office and telephone follow-up were chosen by 70 (56%) and 55 (44%) women, respectively. Women's demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Four (5.7%) and three (5.5%) women who chose office and telephone follow-up were lost to follow-up, respectively (p=1.0). In the telephone group, eight (14.5%) women completed only the 1-week telephone evaluation. Women who chose telephone follow-up were less likely to complete all follow-up (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.12–18.69). The only ongoing pregnancy was in the office follow-up group. Staff rescheduled appointments for 17.4% of women in the office group. Staff called 38.1% and 70.6% of participants at least once at 1 week and 4 weeks, respectively, to complete all assessments. Outcomes: Loss-to-follow-up rates were similar between women who chose office follow-up and those who chose telephone follow-up. However, incomplete evaluations were more common among the latter group. Women who chose telephone follow-up required more attempts to complete assessments than women scheduled for office evaluation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.046 O18 Contraceptive use and counseling among breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study Mody S University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA Panelli D, Hulugalle A, Su HI, Parker B, Gorman JR Objectives: This cross-sectional study explored contraceptive counseling and utilization among breast cancer survivors. Methods: We enrolled reproductive-age women with a history of breast cancer in a cross-sectional study. Participants, who were recruited from the Athena Breast Health Network, the Young Survival Coalition and via social media, completed an online survey. We describe the contraceptive utilization and contraception counseling they received. Results: A total of 181 breast cancer survivors participated in this study. Seventy-two percent of respondents (114/159) reported being sexually active during their cancer treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation). Among contraceptive users (n=113), 50% used condoms. Respondents reported that, given the diagnosis of breast cancer, method safety had the biggest influence on their decision. Sixty-two percent (92/149) reported receiving contraceptive counseling from their oncologist; however, 40% of this group did not receive a specific method recommendation. Of respondents who reported receiving contraceptive counseling from their gynecologist, 45% (35/ 78) reported that their gynecologist recommended a copper IUD. Some 52% of respondents (76/146) wanted their oncologist to discuss contraceptive options, and 58% (84/146) preferred to receive this counseling at the time of diagnosis. Outcomes: Breast cancer patients remain sexually active during cancer treatment and predominately use condoms. If they receive counseling from their oncologist, they often do not receive specific method recommenda- tions. Increased efforts should be pursued to educate oncologists about safe, highly effective contraceptive methods for breast cancer patients. Office versus telephone follow-up after medical abortion Chen MJ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.047