1. Labeling Strategies Matter for Super-Resolution Microscopy: A Comparison between HaloTags and SNAP-tags
- Author
-
James E. Rothman, Rebecca F. Wissner, Derek Toomre, Daniel St Johnston, Stephanie Wood Baguley, Alanna Schepartz, Joerg Bewersdorf, Nicholas Lowe, Edward S. Allgeyer, Roman S. Erdmann, Jennifer H. Richens, Richard Butler, Sheng Zhong, Zhiqun Xi, Alexander D. Thompson, Richens, Jennifer [0000-0002-8241-4826], Allgeyer, Edward [0000-0002-2187-4423], Butler, Richard [0000-0002-3885-1332], St Johnston, Daniel [0000-0001-5582-3301], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
Confocal ,Recombinant Fusion Proteins ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Green Fluorescent Proteins ,Biology ,HaloTag ,nanoscopy ,self-labeling proteins ,01 natural sciences ,Biochemistry ,Article ,live-cell imaging ,Fluorescence ,Rhodamine ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Live cell imaging ,super-resolution microscopy ,Drug Discovery ,Microscopy ,fluorophores ,Animals ,Humans ,Molecular Biology ,Fluorescent Dyes ,Pharmacology ,SNAP-tag ,Microscopy, Confocal ,Staining and Labeling ,010405 organic chemistry ,Super-resolution microscopy ,Rhodamines ,STED microscopy ,Proteins ,3. Good health ,0104 chemical sciences ,STED ,Microscopy, Fluorescence ,chemistry ,microscopy ,Biophysics ,Molecular Medicine ,Drosophila ,HeLa Cells - Abstract
Summary Super-resolution microscopy requires that subcellular structures are labeled with bright and photostable fluorophores, especially for live-cell imaging. Organic fluorophores may help here as they can yield more photons—by orders of magnitude—than fluorescent proteins. To achieve molecular specificity with organic fluorophores in live cells, self-labeling proteins are often used, with HaloTags and SNAP-tags being the most common. However, how these two different tagging systems compare with each other is unclear, especially for stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, which is limited to a small repertoire of fluorophores in living cells. Herein, we compare the two labeling approaches in confocal and STED imaging using various proteins and two model systems. Strikingly, we find that the fluorescent signal can be up to 9-fold higher with HaloTags than with SNAP-tags when using far-red rhodamine derivatives. This result demonstrates that the labeling strategy matters and can greatly influence the duration of super-resolution imaging., Highlights • Systematic comparison of SNAP versus Halo tag labeling by confocal and STED microscopy • Target proteins, fluorophores, and model systems are compared • Large differences in Halo versus SNAP intensity with silicon rhodamine fluorophores • Guidelines for one- and two-color super-resolution imaging are provided, Self-labeling proteins leverage the superior photophysical properties of organic fluorophores and are the method of choice for live-cell nanoscopy. Comparing SNAP-tags and HaloTags, Erdmann et al. show that Halo tagging with silicon rhodamine fluorophores provides brighter labeling for confocal and STED nanoscopy.
- Published
- 2019