1. A prospective study of pulmonary outcomes and chest computed tomography in the first year after COVID-19.
- Author
-
Lerum TV, Meltzer C, Rodriguez JR, Aaløkken TM, Brønstad E, Aarli BB, Aarberg-Lund KM, Durheim MT, Ashraf H, Einvik G, Skjønsberg OH, and Stavem K
- Abstract
COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system. We aimed to evaluate how pulmonary outcomes develop after COVID-19 by assessing participants from the first pandemic wave prospectively 3 and 12 months following hospital discharge. Pulmonary outcomes included self-reported dyspnoea assessed with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), spirometry, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ( D
LCO ), body plethysmography and chest computed tomography (CT). Chest CT was repeated at 12 months in participants with pathological findings at 3 months. The World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale for clinical improvement defined disease severity in the acute phase. Of 262 included COVID-19 patients, 245 (94%) and 222 (90%) participants attended the 3- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. Self-reported dyspnoea and 6MWD remained unchanged between the two time points, while DLCO and total lung capacity improved (0.28 mmol·min-1 ·kPa-1 , 95% CI 0.12-0.44, and 0.13 L, 95% CI 0.02-0.24, respectively). The prevalence of fibrotic-like findings on chest CT at 3 and 12 months in those with follow-up chest CT was unaltered. Those with more severe disease had worse dyspnoea, DLCO and total lung capacity values than those with mild disease. There was an overall positive development of pulmonary outcomes from 3 to 12 months after hospital discharge. The discrepancy between the unaltered prevalence of self-reported dyspnoea and the improvement in pulmonary function underscores the complexity of dyspnoea as a prominent factor of long-COVID. The lack of increase in fibrotic-like findings from 3 to 12 months suggests that SARS-CoV-2 does not induce a progressive fibrotic process in the lungs., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: T.V. Lerum has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Meltzer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.R. Rodriguez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T.M. Aaløkken has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Brønstad has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B.B. Aarli reports personal fees for lectures and advisory board work from AstraZeneca, personal fees for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Chiesi Pharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K.M. Aarberg-Lund has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.T. Durheim reports grants to his institution and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H. Ashraf reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: G. Einvik reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees for consultancy from AstraZeneca AB, outside the submitted work. Conflicts of interest: O.H. Skjønsberg has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Stavem reports fees from UCB Pharma and MSD, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF