Search

Background The concentration of exhaled octane has been postulated as a reliable biomarker for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) using metabolomics analysis with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A point-of-care (POC) breath test was developed in recent years to accurately measure octane at the bedside. The aim of the present study was to validate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled octane for ARDS using a POC breath test in invasively ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods This was an observational cohort study of consecutive patients receiving invasive ventilation for at least 24 h, recruited in two university ICUs. GC-MS and POC breath tests were used to quantify the exhaled octane concentration. ARDS was assessed by three experts following the Berlin definition and used as the reference standard. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess diagnostic accuracy. Results 519 patients were included and 190 (37%) fulfilled the criteria for ARDS. The median (interquartile range) concentration of octane using the POC breath test was not significantly different between patients with ARDS (0.14 (0.05–0.37) ppb) and without ARDS (0.11 (0.06–0.26) ppb; p=0.64). The AUC for ARDS based on the octane concentration in exhaled breath using the POC breath test was 0.52 (95% CI 0.46–0.57). Analysis of exhaled octane with GC-MS showed similar results. Conclusions Octane in exhaled breath has insufficient diagnostic accuracy for ARDS. This disqualifies the use of octane as a biomarker in the diagnosis of ARDS and challenges most of the research performed up to now in the field of exhaled breath metabolomics.

Background Changes in exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be used to discriminate between respiratory diseases, and increased concentrations of hydrocarbons are commonly linked to oxidative stress. However, the VOCs identified are inconsistent between studies, and translational studies are lacking. Methods In this bench to bedside study, we captured VOCs in the headspace of A549 epithelial cells after exposure to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), to induce oxidative stress, using high-capacity polydimethylsiloxane sorbent fibres. Exposed and unexposed cells were compared using targeted and untargeted analysis. Breath samples of invasively ventilated intensive care unit patients (n=489) were collected on sorbent tubes and associated with the inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO2) to reflect pulmonary oxidative stress. Headspace samples and breath samples were analysed using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Results In the cell, headspace octane concentration was decreased after oxidative stress (p=0.0013), while the other VOCs were not affected. 2-ethyl-1-hexanol showed an increased concentration in the headspace of cells undergoing oxidative stress in untargeted analysis (p=0.00014). None of the VOCs that were linked to oxidative stress showed a significant correlation with FIO2 (Rs range: −0.015 to −0.065) or discriminated between patients with FIO2 ≥0.6 or below (area under the curve range: 0.48 to 0.55). Conclusion Despite a comprehensive translational approach, validation of known and novel volatile biomarkers of oxidative stress was not possible in patients at risk of pulmonary oxidative injury. The inconsistencies observed highlight the difficulties faced in VOC biomarker validation, and that caution is warranted in the interpretation of the pathophysiological origin of discovered exhaled breath biomarkers.

Rationale The concentration of octane and acetaldehyde in exhaled breath has good diagnostic accuracy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to determine whether breath octane and acetaldehyde are able to distinguish the presence and absence of ARDS in critically ill patients suspected to have ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study into exhaled breath analysis using gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Difference in the relative abundance of octane and acetaldehyde in exhaled breath was compared between patients with and without ARDS using the Mann–Whitney U-test and the association was quantified using logistic regression. The discriminative accuracy of octane and acetaldehyde, alone or in combination, was calculated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC). Results We included 98 patients, of whom 32 had ARDS and 66 did not. The area under the acetaldehyde peak was higher in patients with ARDS (p=0.03), and associated with the presence of ARDS (OR 1.06 per 100 000 count change, 95% CI 1.02–1.13 per 100 000 count change; p=0.01). A combined model with octane and acetaldehyde showed a high specificity and low sensitivity (90% and 40.6%, respectively), with a low accuracy (AUROCC 0.65, 95% CI 0.53–0.78). Conclusion Patients suspected to have VAP with ARDS had a higher acetaldehyde concentration in exhaled breath than patients suspected to have VAP without ARDS. However, in this patient population, discrimination of these breath biomarkers for ARDS was poor, indicating the difficulty of translating diagnostic tests between clinical settings.

Rationale Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is currently diagnosed by the Berlin definition, which does not include a direct measure of pulmonary oedema, endothelial permeability or pulmonary inflammation. We hypothesised that biomarkers of these processes have good diagnostic accuracy for ARDS. Methods Medline and Scopus were searched for original diagnostic studies using minimally invasive testing. Primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy per test and was categorised by control group. The methodological quality was assessed with QUADAS-2 tool. Biomarkers that had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) of >0.75 and were studied with minimal bias against an unselected control group were considered to be promising. Results Forty-four articles were included. The median AUROCC for all evaluated tests was 0.80 (25th to 75th percentile: 0.72–0.88). The type of control group influenced the diagnostic accuracy (p=0.0095). Higher risk of bias was associated with higher diagnostic accuracy (AUROCC 0.75 for low-bias, 0.77 for intermediate-bias and 0.84 for high-bias studies; p=0.0023). Club cell protein 16 and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products in plasma and two panels with biomarkers of oxidative stress in breath showed good diagnostic accuracy in low-bias studies that compared ARDS patients to an unselected intensive care unit (ICU) population. Conclusion This systematic review revealed only four diagnostic tests fulfilling stringent criteria for a promising biomarker in a low-bias setting. For implementation into the clinical setting, prospective studies in a general unselected ICU population with good methodological quality are needed.