Search

The hemodynamic effects of graded-dose infusions of amrinone (maximal dose 30 micrograms/kg/min) (10 patients) and isoproterenol (maximum dose 4 micrograms/min) (11 patients) were assessed in patients with a range of left ventricular (LV) function. LV ejection fraction ranged from 0.13 to 0.77 (mean +/- standard deviation 0.47 +/- 0.23) among the patients who received amrinone and from 0.24 to 0.77 (mean 0.52 +/- 0.18) among those who received isoproterenol. Peak-dose amrinone produced a reduction in LV filling pressure (from 15 +/- 10 to 10 +/- 7 mm Hg, p less than 0.001), but no significant change in heart rate, cardiac output, mean aortic pressure, total systemic vascular resistance (TSVR) or LV dP/dt max. In contrast, peak-dose isoproterenol produced a similar reduction in LV filling pressure (from 17 +/- 12 to 13 +/- 13 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), but also caused increases in heart rate, cardiac output and LV dP/dt max and decreases in mean aortic pressure and TSVR (p less than 0.001). The absolute change in cardiac output and stroke volume correlated closely with the change in TSVR in response to amrinone (r = -0.90, p less than 0.001 and r = -0.84, p = 0.002, respectively), but not in response to isoproterenol. Although isoproterenol produced a marked increase in cardiac output and LV dP/dt max (not explained by heart rate changes alone) in all patients, amrinone produced an increase in cardiac output only in those with markedly elevated LV filling pressures (who had a reduction in TSVR), and an increase in LV dP/dt in a minority.

Six patients with severe congestive heart failure refractory to conventional therapy, including vasodilators, were treated with oral amrinone for a mean duration of 41 weeks (range 20 to 72 weeks). At initiation of therapy, the cardiac index increased from 1.74 +/- 0.31 to 2.62 +/- 0.52 (mean +/- SD) liters/min/m2 (p less than 0.01) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased from 26.5 +/- 3.5 to 19.5 +/- 5.4 mm Hg (p less than 0.05). Symptoms were alleviated and exercise capacity increased from 5.9 +/- 2.9 to 11.5 +/- 4.5 minutes (p less than 0.05). During long-term therapy, exercise capacity remained constants in three patients whereas it decreased in three others. All patients demonstrated an increase in heart size. Withdrawal of amrinone therapy precipitated severe symptoms at rest and hemodynamic deterioration in all patients. The cardiac index decreased from 1.87 +/- 0.49 to 1.32 +/- 0.30 liter/min/m2 (p less than 0.05) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure rose from 20.6 +/- 2.9 to 28.8 +/- 5.6 mm Hg (p less than 0.05). These changes were reversed by reinstitution of therapy. Thus, amrinone-dependent hemodynamic benefits were demonstrated during long-term therapy without tachyphylaxis. In addition, progression of the underlying cardiac disease was observed in every patient.

Amrinone, 100 mg orally every 8 hours, was administered to 13 patients with moderate-to-severe congestive heart failure (CHF) for 1 month on an outpatient basis to determine the beneficial and undesirable effects of this new cardioactive agent in this clinical setting. These subjects received conventional CHF medications during the course of study. Ten patients who received conventional CHF medications alone served as a control group. Changes in functional classification were not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. Amrinone augmented exercise capacity 37% above baseline compared with a 12% improvement for the control group. Noninvasive indexes of resting left ventricular function (echocardiography and systolic time intervals) did not change significantly for either group, nor was there a significant change in the exercise ejection fraction. All patients treated with amrinone had greater than or equal to 1 symptom-related or laboratory-detected adverse effect. An increase in the frequency of ventricular ectopic beats was noted at rest in 4 and with exercise in 6 patients (salvos of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 2). Six subjects treated with amrinone had gastrointestinal symptoms and 8 developed a viral-like illness. Other adverse effects noted in the amrinone-treated group included near-syncope, headaches, marked anxiety, chest pain, palpitations, maculopapular rash, hypokalemia, and elevation of serum transaminase levels. The control patients had significantly fewer adverse effects. Although individual patients with CHF may benefit from long-term amrinone therapy, the low benefit-to-risk-adverse effect ratio does not warrant widespread application of this drug in the outpatient management of CHF and requires caution when prescribing.

Clinical trials of intravenous amrinone were performed in 462 patients severely ill with congestive heart failure. All were monitored invasively. Adverse reactions were complicated by underlying disease severity and concomitant drug therapy. No consistent pattern of arrhythmias emerged in relation to intravenous amrinone administration. Thrombocytopenia was noted in 2.4% of patients, but it was asymptomatic with no demonstrable bone marrow depression or antiplatelet antibodies. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, hypotension and fever were rare, each occurring in fewer than 2% of patients. Liver enzyme alterations were seen in 1 patient, but it could not be determined whether these changes were related to intravenous use of the drug. Chest pain and irritation at the site of injection were noted in 1 patient each. Spontaneous anecdotal postapproval reports cited tachycardia, liver enzyme elevation, thrombocytopenia, intravenous site irritation, failure to respond and anaphylactoid response as adverse effects or possible adverse effects; each was mentioned in 3 or fewer reports. Drugs contraindicated for concomitant use with intravenous amrinone are listed, and chemical interactions with glucose solutions and intravenous furosemide are discussed.

Amrinone, a new nonadrenergic, nonglycosidic agent with combined positive inotropic and vasodilating properties, was approved recently for parenteral use in the treatment of left ventricular failure. Its mechanism of action is mediated primarily by selective phosphodiesterase fraction III inhibition, although at high doses alterations of calcium transport may occur. Acute hemodynamic changes produced by amrinone include augmentation of cardiac output and decreases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, right atrial pressure and systemic vascular resistance. Heart rate and blood pressure remain unaltered. Myocardial oxygen consumption declines concomitantly with the decrease in systolic wall tension. The efficacy of amrinone is comparable to that of dobutamine and dopamine. Synergistic interactions with catecholamines and vasodilators are described. Adverse effects are minimal, with dosage limited predominantly by decreases in filling pressures.

Chronic congestive heart failure is a frequently occurring disease associated with an impaired quality of life and significant mortality rate. Progress has been made in dissecting the pathophysiologic changes of congestive failure and in using vasodilators, newer positive inotropic agents, and other treatment modalities. Despite these advances, the overall mortality rate from congestive heart failure has not decreased. Further, many unanswered questions remain: How and why does a myocardial cell die? How should quality of life be measured? When should vasodilators and positive inotropic agents be given? What role do receptors play in pathogenesis and therapy? Can sudden death in heart failure be prevented? These and other questions will provide the stimulus for further studies in congestive heart failure.

The relative contribution of inotropic and vasodilator effect to amrinone-induced hemodynamic improvement in congestive heart failure (CHF) is unknown. In 9 patients with CHF, the effects of amrinone and nitroprusside on hemodynamic and radionuclide measurements were compared to determine whether reduced afterload accounts for the amrinone-induced decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume. In each patient, the end-systolic pressure-volume relation was derived using nitroprusside. After terminating nitroprusside treatment, intravenous amrinone (3 mg/kg) caused end-systolic volume to decrease from 148 +/- 32 ml/m2 (mean +/- standard deviation) to 133 +/- 32 ml/m2 (p less than 0.05), causing an increase in cardiac index from 1.9 +/- 0.8 to 2.7 +/- 0.8 liters/min/m2 (p less than 0.001). Arterial end-systolic pressure decreased in all patients during amrinone administration, from 96 +/- 22 to 84 +/- 19 mm Hg (p less than 0.005), as did systemic vascular resistance. Nitroprusside doses needed to match the decrease in LV end-systolic volume induced by amrinone caused significantly greater decreases in arterial end-systolic pressure than did amrinone (p less than 0.01). The amrinone-induced decrease in end-systolic volume exceeded that predicted for a pure vasodilator based on arterial end-systolic pressure and the nitroprusside-derived pressure-volume relation in 6 patients. In 3 patients, the decrease in end-systolic volume did not exceed that expected for a pure vasodilator. In conclusion, after amrinone treatment, afterload reduction occurs in all patients with severe CHF and is the sole effect in some.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amrinone, a new inotropic agent, has been shown to be beneficial in patients with congestive heart failure. However, its hemodynamic effects have not been compared with those those of currently useful catecholamines. In this study, the effects of intravenously administered dobutamine and amrinone were compared in eight patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. Dobutamine was infused with a maximal increase in cardiac index was reached for undesirable effects were produced. This dose was then continued for 8 hours. After a return of hemodynamic values to baseline level, amrinone was infused at a rate of 40 microgram/kg per min for 1 hour and then 10 microgram/kg per min for 24 hours. Both drugs significantly improved cardiac index while simultaneously decreasing systemic vascular resistance and right atrial and pulmonary wedge pressures (p less than 0.05). Initially no differences could be found between the drugs. However, with prolonged infusion amrinone produced a sustained improvement whereas dobutamine had a decreased effectiveness. Thus, amrinone is comparable in effect with the optimal dose of dobutamine and would appear to be an extremely promising drug in the acute treatment of severe congestive heart failure.

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) have a high prevalence of complex ventricular arrhythmias. Accordingly, the electrophysiologic effects of new drugs for the treatment of CHF should be studied to determine whether they are safe in this population of patients. Fifteen patients with New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV CHF underwent hemodynamic and electrophysiologic testing during control conditions, and after 10 to 20 micrograms/kg/min of intravenous amrinone (dosages that increased cardiac output and decreased left ventricular filling pressures). All cardioactive drugs were stopped for at least 5 half-lives before entry into the study. Amrinone decreased the atrial effective refractory period from 256 to 240 ms (p = 0.015) and the AV nodal functional refractory period from 374 to 356 ms (p less than 0.05), and enhanced maximal 1:1 AV nodal conduction from 371 to 334 ms (p = 0.006). Prolonged HV intervals were present in 9 of 15 patients and were not affected by amrinone. Holter monitoring was performed in 10 patients during acute oral administration of amrinone. There were no significant changes in the frequency of ventricular extrasystoles or ventricular tachycardia, although the frequency of ventricular couples tended to increase slightly. Amrinone therefore enhances AV conduction and does not appear to have significant arrhythmogenic potential during acute administration.

Amrinone is an effective inotropic agent, but its electrophysiologic effects in humans have not been previously determined. Fifteen patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) New York Heart Association functional class II to IV, underwent an electrophysiologic study after withdrawal of all other cardioactive drugs before and after 10 to 20 micrograms/kg/min of intravenous amrinone (doses that increased cardiac index and decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and systemic vascular resistance, p less than 0.002). Amrinone caused no change in PR, QRS, QTc, AH or HV intervals or maximal corrected sinus node recovery time and had no significant effect on the ventricular effective refractory periods. Amrinone decreased the atrial effective refractory period from 256 +/- 40 to 240 +/- 38 ms (p = 0.015), and the atrioventricular (AV) nodal functional refractory period from 374 +/- 65 to 356 +/- 64 ms (p less than 0.05), and enhanced maximal 1:1 AV nodal conduction from 371 +/- 46 to 334 +/- 47 ms (p = 0.006). Nine patients had baseline HV prolongation; this was not affected by amrinone. The frequency of inducible ventricular tachycardia was not significantly affected by amrinone. Holter recordings (24 to 48 hours) were obtained from 10 patients before and after acute oral amrinone dosing (75 to 150 mg every 8 hours). There was no change in the number of ventricular premature contractions per 24 hours (2,197 +/- 3,305 vs 2,616 +/- 2,436) or number of runs of ventricular tachycardia per 24 hours (10 +/- 12 vs 12 +/- 13); however, the number of ventricular couplets per 24 hours increased from 22 +/- 34 to 52 +/- 55 (p = 0.054).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In 11 dogs ischemic left ventricular failure characterized by a 30 percent reduction in cardiac output and a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure of 18 mm Hg or more was produced by proximal occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by serial occlusions of the distal left circumflex coronary artery. Administration of amrinone in an intravenous bolus injection followed by a constant infusion produced improvements in cardiac output (from 1.62 +/- 0.50 to 2.19 +/- 0.52 liters/min [mean +/- standard deviation], p less than 0.05), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (from 21.6 +/- 3.5 to 11.0 +/- 5.4 mm Hg, p less than 0.05) and peak positive rate of rise of left ventricular pressure [dP/dt] (from 1,264 +/- 241 to 1,800 +/- 458 mm Hg.s-1, p less than 0.05). These improvements were maintained throughout the 20 minute period of therapy. No significant alteration in heart rate or arterial pressure was noted. In parallel with the hemodynamic improvement myocardial oxygen consumption improved to 0.094 +/- 0.05 and 0.092 +/- 0.04 vol.min-1.g-1 after 2 and 20 minutes, respectively, of amrinone compared with 0.124 +/- 0.05 during left ventricular failure (both p less than 0.05). The effects of amrinone on left ventricular failure are due to augmented contractility and mild systemic vasodilatation. The reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption during amrinone-treated left ventricular failure presumably results from a reduction in ventricular wall tension that more than offsets the effect of an increase in contractility.

The acute effects of an oral preparation of amrinone, a recently synthesized cardiotonic agent, were assessed noninvasively in nine patients who had advanced heart failure that persisted despite treatment with digitalis, diuretic drugs and afterload-reducing agents. All patients demonstrated an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction determined by radionuclide ventriculography (20.3 +/- 2.8 to 30.8 +/- 4.8 percent [mean +/- standard error of the mean], p less than 0.005) after a single dose of amrinone. Initial effects were seen within 1 hour, with the peak effect occurring at 1 to 3 hours; persistent effects were demonstrable at 4 to 6 hours. No change in blood pressure, heart rate or rhythm was observed, and there was no clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia. Continued benefit was demonstrated by radionuclide ventriculography in two patients treated for 1 and 6 weeks, respectively, although two other patients experienced major side effects with the chronic administration of amrinone. Although orally administered amrinone shows promise as a potentially useful agent in the treatment of advanced heart failure, the safety of this drug remains to be established.

Positive inotropic agents can stimulate the severely depressed myocardium in late stages of heart failure. However, symptomatic benefits are only gained by improvement in the deranged peripheral circulation, which produces symptoms and limitations. In augmenting cardiac output and reducing filling pressures, the effects of positive inotropic agents and vasodilators are similar and additive, and the "contractile reserve of the heart" in response to inotropic stimulation may limit efficacy of these agents. Although symptomatic benefits occur in patients with severe heart failure after improvement in peripheral blood flow distribution, survival may not be altered, because this appears to be determined more by the amount of myocardial damage and its progression, and neither of these is affected by either inotropic agents or vasodilators. Indeed, in early stages of heart failure, therapy must be redirected toward preventing further myocardial cell loss rather than stimulating pump function.

Although amrinone produces acute hemodynamic improvement in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), it has not produced clinical benefits in long-term controlled trials. To determined if the administration of subtherapeutic doses of amrinone may account for its lack of efficacy in these studies, the dose requirements of the drug were investigated in 30 patients with severe CHF. Doses of 100 mg of oral amrinone produced moderate increases in cardiac index (0.35 liters/min/m2) and decreases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (6.8 mm Hg) and systemic vascular resistance (16%) (all p less than 0.01); these effects, however, were short-lived (less than 2.5 hours). Doses of 200 mg of oral amrinone produced marked increases in cardiac index (0.56 liters/min/m2) and substantial decreases in left ventricular filling pressure (9.9 mm Hg) and systemic vascular resistance (30%) (all p less than 0.01), and these effects persisted for longer than 4 hours. Only 4 patients showed hemodynamic responses with 100 mg of the drug that were sufficiently marked and long-lasting to merit chronic therapy, whereas 28 patients had such a response with the 200-mg dose. When 200 mg of amrinone was administered orally every 8 hours, sustained hemodynamic benefits were seen for 48 hours. However, 16 of 22 patients who received 600 mg of the drug daily for more than 1 week had intolerable adverse reactions that required drug withdrawal. In conclusion, hemodynamically effective doses of amrinone (600 mg/day) cannot be tolerated for long periods by most patients with severe chronic CHF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous amrinone were studied in 22 male patients aged 38 to 62 years with left ventricular failure occurring within 18 hours of acute myocardial infarction. After hemodynamic confirmation of a raised left-sided cardiac filling pressure--pulmonary artery occluded pressure greater than 20 mm Hg--patients were randomized to either low-dose infusion of amrinone (200 micrograms/kg/hr for 30 minutes, 400 micrograms/kg/hr for 30 minutes and then 800 micrograms/kg/hr for 30 minutes) or high-dose infusion of the drug (800, 1,600 and 3,200 micrograms/kg/hr sequentially, each for 30 minutes). Hemodynamic measurements were obtained at 1 hour before amrinone and at the end of each infusion step. Low-dose infusion of amrinone resulted in a progressive increase in cardiac output (p less than 0.05) and stroke volume (p less than 0.05) and progressive reductions in pulmonary artery occluded pressure (p less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance (p less than 0.05). Systemic blood pressure and heart rate were unchanged. High-dose infusion resulted in a similar increase in cardiac output (p less than 0.05) but no change in stroke volume owing to associated tachycardia (p less than 0.01). There was a significantly greater decrease in pulmonary artery occluded pressure compared with the low-dose infusion (p less than 0.05), and systemic arterial diastolic and mean pressures were also decreased (p less than 0.05). The decrease in systemic vascular resistance was of a similar order to that induced by the low-dose infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chronic heart failure results from two processes, i.e., myocardial and congestive failure. Myocardial failure is clinically silent, most often progresses slowly, and is documented by a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Multiple etiologic factors include systolic and diastolic overloads, myocardial necrosis and/or ischemia, and, perhaps, microvascular spasm. Myocardial failure ultimately leads to exaggerated neurohumoral compensatory mechanisms and derangements of the peripheral circulation, which are the hallmarks of congestive heart failure. At that stage of the syndrome, patients have symptoms, initially, with exercise and, later, at rest. Objective assessment of severity is afforded by determination of maximal oxygen uptake during maximal exercise testing. When congestive heart failure supervenes, the prognosis is poor. Current medical therapy is aimed at improving the derangements of the peripheral circulation, which relieves the symptoms but leaves the primary myocardial process unaffected. The goal of future therapy is to intervene at an earlier stage of the syndrome to halt or even partially reverse the myocardial failure.

Hemodynamic effects of amrinone were studied in 2 groups of patients after open heart surgery. Group I consisted of 10 patients with moderate heart failure. In the absence of inotropic agents, their mean cardiac index (CI) was 2.02 +/- 0.41 liters/min/m2 and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 19 +/- 3 mm Hg. Amrinone was administered 24 hours postoperatively by bolus injection (2 mg/kg) and by 12-hour infusions (20 micrograms/kg/min). Hemodynamic data and plasma concentrations were obtained 10 and 20 minutes after the bolus injection and at 1, 4, 8 and 12 hours during infusion. Significant beneficial changes were noted in CI, PCWP, right atrial pressure, systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance. Group II consisted of 5 patients in severe cardiogenic shock (mean CI 1.97 +/- 0.3 liters/min/m2, mean PCWP 28 +/- 8 mm Hg) despite adrenergic agonists in all patients and intraaortic counterpulsation in 2. After these measures, amrinone was given intravenously for 36 to 72 hours as additional inotropic support. Significant improvement was observed in CI, PCWP, right atrial pressure, systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance. Four patients in this group were discharged; 1 patient died after 5 days in acute renal failure and coma grade IV. No serious adverse effects of amrinone were observed in any group II patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of 3 types of vasoactive agents, hydralazine, nifedipine and amrinone, were evaluated in 7 patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). Hemodynamic values were measured before and after drug administration in every patient. All drugs increased cardiac output and reduced both systemic and pulmonary resistance in the patients studied. Only nifedipine significantly reduced pulmonary artery (PA) pressure (6 +/- 5 mm Hg). In addition, it decreased pulmonary resistance to a greater degree than systemic resistance in 2 of the 7 patients, suggesting that nifedipine can cause selective pulmonary vasodilation in some patients. Hydralazine appeared to increase cardiac output and stroke volume by reducing systemic resistance. There was no evidence of direct pulmonary vasodilating effects; it decreased systemic resistance more than pulmonary resistance in every case. The increase in cardiac output from amrinone was secondary to a decrease in systemic arterial pressure with reflex tachycardia; stroke volume was unchanged. Amrinone had little pulmonary effect in all but 1 patient, in whom it substantially reduced PA pressure and pulmonary resistance. The mechanism of action of these 3 drugs in PPH differs. Nifedipine holds the most promise as an effective pulmonary vasodilator. A study of the effects of long-term administration of nifedipine in PPH is warranted.

Dopamine and dobutamine increase myocardial contractility by beta-adrenergic stimulation. Both agents provide significant support for decompensating congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. At the same time, both agents can have significant adverse effects. In 1981, it was reported that amrinone, a bipyridine derivative, produced hemodynamic changes similar to those of dobutamine. To confirm these results, the hemodynamic and clinical effects of amrinone were compared with those of dopamine and dobutamine in 15 consecutive patients with CHF. Although each drug improved maximal cardiac index to a similar extent, dopamine did not decrease pulmonary artery wedge pressure and caused a greater increase in heart rate. Dobutamine and amrinone conferred similar hemodynamic benefits: cardiac index improved from 2.4 +/- 0.2 to 3.4 +/- 0.2 liters/min/m2 with dobutamine and from 2.1 +/- 0.2 to 3.2 +/- 0.2 liters/min/m2 with amrinone. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure decreased similarly: from 19 +/- 2 to 13 +/- 1 mm Hg with dobutamine and from 18 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 1 mm Hg with amrinone. Dobutamine and amrinone produced similar modest decreases in mean arterial pressure and increments in heart rate. Dopamine was poorly tolerated; 5 patients developed such severe adverse reactions that this drug was discontinued prematurely. Dobutamine and amrinone were much better tolerated. Although amrinone caused asymptomatic tachycardia (heart rate increase greater than 20% over baseline) in 4 patients, no patient developed an adverse reaction warranting its premature termination.

The pathophysiologic cycle of heart failure is initiated by myocardial failure that accompanies a reduction in myocardial contractility secondary to ischemic or myopathic heart disease. Reduction in cardiac output and oxygen delivery to the tissues is followed by vasoconstriction that raises systemic vascular resistance to preserve systemic arterial pressure while maintaining regional O2 availability. As a consequence, however, impedance to left ventricular ejection is increased, creating an additional hemodynamic burden for the failing heart. A vicious cycle ensues. Hemodynamic features of acute cardiac failure include decreases in cardiac output and mixed venous O2 saturation, together with increases in left ventricular filling pressure and systemic resistance. If hypotension is present with failure, there is a markedly decreased cardiac output or an inappropriate increase in systemic resistance. If acidosis is also present with hypotension and failure, cardiac output is severely decreased and lactic acid is increased. A major objective of medical therapy in acute heart failure is to enhance ventricular emptying, thereby increasing cardiac output and O2 delivery while decreasing left ventricular filling pressure, pulmonary venous pressure and vascular resistance. Potent intravenous drugs that have a positive inotropic effect on the myocardium, including amrinone and dobutamine, have been shown to increase ventricular emptying in patients with acute heart failure. Intravenous amrinone improves pump performance without adversely raising myocardial O2 consumption, thereby enhancing myocardial efficiency. These drugs also promote a degree of vasodilation through both direct and secondary effects on the systemic circulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animal and human studies suggest that amrinone can cause significant improvement in the systemic hemodynamics of patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF), and do so without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption. Because patients with CHF appear to be vulnerable to any further worsening of the myocardial oxygen supply-and-demand balance, amrinone may have a distinct advantage over catecholamine agents that tend to increase myocardial oxygen demand.