Search

The pharmacodynamic parameter that appears to correlate best with a successful therapeutic outcome with beta-lactam antibiotics is the length of time the serum antibiotic concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the infecting pathogen. By maximizing this parameter, continuous administration of beta-lactam and related antibiotics by intravenous infusion could represent the optimal mode of drug administration. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ceftazidime administered by continuous intravenous infusion have been evaluated previously. Aztreonam is a monobactam antibiotic with similar pharmacokinetic and microbiologic activity to that of ceftazidime. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of aztreonam administered as a continuous intravenous infusion in healthy volunteers against multiple clinical isolates. Five men and 3 women received 6 g of aztreonam administered by continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours. Blood samples were collected before the infusion and at 0.5, 1 through 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the start of the infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by standard equations. In vitro susceptibility testing was performed using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines for 4 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacteria (2 each of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Serum inhibitory titers (SITs) were determined in duplicate for each clinical isolate at 0 and 24 hours. The subjects' mean (+/- SD) age was 29.3+/-4.4 years; mean weight, 74.6+/-14.0 kg; and calculated mean creatinine clearance, 107+/-13 mL/min. For the pharmacokinetic parameters, mean (+/- SD) values were as follows: steady-state serum concentration, 40.9+/-8.8 microg/L; half-life, 1.5+/-0.4 hours; elimination rate constant, 0.50+/-0.13 hours(-1); steady-state volume of distribution, 0.18+/-0.04 L/kg; and total body clearance, 6.1+/-1.2 L/h. The MICs were 0.0625 and 0.125 microg/mL against the 2 E coli isolates and 4 microg/mL against both P aeruginosa isolates. The median SITs against the E. coli isolates were 1:256 and 1:512, and against the P. aeruginosa isolates were 1:8 and 1:16. At steady state, II subjects had serum concentrations of aztreonam > or =4 times the MIC for each organism. These findings suggest that further clinical study of the administration of aztreonam by continuous intravenous infusion is warranted.

There were 73 evaluable patients entered into a prospective, double-blinded trial comparing aztreonam/clindamycin (A/C) to gentamicin/clindamycin (G/C) for the prevention of infection after penetrating abdominal trauma. Aztreonam was administered at a dosage of 2 g every 8 hours and gentamicin at 5 mg/kg for the first 24 hours and then adjusted by serum monitoring to a peak of 6 to 8 micrograms/mL and a trough of less than 2 micrograms/mL; all patients received 900 mg of clindamycin every 8 hours. Patients with colon wounds received 4 days of antibiotics, and the remaining patients received a 24-hour course. Gunshot wounds occurred in 69% of patients: 74% of all patients had some hollow viscus injury, and 26% had only solid viscus injury. The groups were well matched according to abdominal trauma index, percentage with colon injury, and transfusion requirements. Failures occurred in eight patients (11%): two wound infections, five intra-abdominal infections, and one case of necrotizing fasciitis. Seven infections occurred in 36 (19%) G/C patients compared with 1 in 37 (3%) A/C patients (p < 0.03). The hospital stay was 12 +/- 11 days for G/C patients and 8 +/- 7 for A/C patients (p < 0.12). The superiority of the A/C regimen may be partially attributable to relative underdosing of gentamicin (approximately half of the patients had inadequate levels after 24 hours) combined with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile (significantly prolonged half-life) of aztreonam in this clinical setting.

Aztreonam, the first monobactam, has been used extensively in the treatment of a variety of infections caused by gram-negative pathogens. It has been shown to be highly effective against susceptible bacteria without causing serious adverse reactions. Its pharmacologic profile can be attributed to its unique chemical properties and mechanisms of action, which differ substantially from those of the bicyclic beta-lactams, such as the penicillins and cephalosporins. Administered parenterally, aztreonam provides peak serum concentrations for most Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It is widely distributed throughout the body. Excretion is largely dependent on renal mechanisms, so dosage can be adjusted in the presence of renal impairment. The clinical uses of aztreonam include treatment of urinary tract, lower respiratory tract, and intraabdominal infections, as well as septicemia, endometritis, pelvic cellulitis, and skin and skin structure infections due to aerobic gram-negative organisms. It is concluded that aztreonam can be used with confidence in the single-drug treatment of susceptible aerobic, gram-negative pathogens. In the treatment of mixed infections, or those of unknown etiology, however, combination therapy is recommended to ensure coverage of gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria.

The introduction of gentamicin almost 20 years ago provided an effective option for the treatment of gram-negative bacillary infections. During the past few years, the availability of aztreonam (a monobactam), imipenem (a carbapenem), and newer cephalosporins within vitro activities comparable with aminoglycosides against many gram-negative bacilli, has stimulated a reassessment of the role of aminoglycosides in treating these infections. When determining the role of new antimicrobials as potential replacements for more established agents, the clinical focus should be on three factors: comparative efficacy, safety, and cost. Consideration of cost is relevant only when efficacy and safety are equivalent. Other factors, such as comparative in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, and effect on normal flora can also influence the selection of an antimicrobial regimen. A new class of antimicrobials, the monobactams, is the focus of this review. The only member of this class currently in clinical use is aztreonam. A comparison with aminoglycosides is particularly relevant because aztreonam is active against aerobic gram-negative bacilli. This review will discuss the acknowledged concerns with aminoglycoside use and compare the characteristics of aztreonam and currently marketed aminoglycosides.