Search

Background: Venous thromboembolism risk increases in hospitals due to reduced patient mobility. However, initial mobility evaluations for thromboembolism risk are often subjective and lack standardization, potentially leading to inaccurate risk assessments and insufficient prevention., Methods: A retrospective study at a quaternary academic hospital analyzed patients using the Padua risk tool, which includes a mobility question, and the Johns Hopkins-Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scores to objectively measure mobility. Reduced mobility was defined as JH-HLM scores ≤3 over ≥3 consecutive days. The study evaluated the association between reduced mobility and hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism using multivariable logistic regression, comparing admitting health care professional assessments with JH-HLM scores. Symptomatic, hospital-acquired thromboembolisms were diagnosed radiographically by treating providers., Results: Of 1715 patients, 33 (1.9%) developed venous thromboembolism. Reduced mobility, as determined by the JH-HLM scores, showed a significant association with thromboembolic events (adjusted OR: 2.53, 95%CI:1.23-5.22, P = .012). In contrast, the initial Padua assessment of expected reduced mobility at admission did not. The JH-HLM identified 19.1% of patients as having reduced mobility versus 6.5% by admitting health care professionals, suggesting 37 high-risk patients were misclassified as low risk and were not prescribed thrombosis prophylaxis; 4 patients developed thromboembolic events. JH-HLM detected reduced mobility in 36% of thromboembolic cases, compared to 9% by admitting health care professionals., Conclusion: Initial mobility evaluations by admitting health care professionals during venous thromboembolism risk assessment may not reflect patient mobility over their hospital stay. This highlights the need for objective measures like JH-HLM in risk assessments to improve accuracy and potentially reduce thromboembolism incidents., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Post-hospitalization transition interventions remain a priority in preventing rehospitalization. However, not all patients referred for readmission prevention interventions receive them. We sought to 1) define patient characteristics associated with non-receipt of readmission prevention interventions (among those eligible for them), and 2) determine whether these same patient characteristics are associated with hospital readmission at the state level., Methods: We used state-wide data from the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission to determine patient-level factors associated with state-wide readmissions. Concurrently, we conducted a retrospective analysis of discharged patients referred to receive 1 of 3 post-discharge interventions between January 2013 and July 2019-a nurse transition guide, post-discharge phone call, or follow-up appointment in our post-discharge clinic-to determine patient-level factors associated with not receiving the intervention. Multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds of not accepting or not receiving the interventions., Results: Older age, male gender, black race, higher expected readmission rate, and lower socioeconomic status were significantly associated with 30-day readmission in hospitalized Maryland patients. Most of these variables (age, sex, race, payer type [Medicaid or non-Medicaid], and socioeconomic status) were also associated with non-receipt of intervention., Conclusions: We found that many of the same patient-level characteristics associated with the highest readmission risk are also associated with non-receipt of readmission reduction interventions. This highlights the paradox that patients at high risk of readmission are least likely to accept or receive interventions for preventing readmission. Identifying strategies to engage hard-to-reach high-risk patients continues to be an unmet challenge in readmission prevention., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a predictor of adverse events in patients with heart failure. We examined the relation between acute changes in NT-proBNP during a single hospitalization and subsequent mortality and readmission. The data from a cohort of 241 consecutive patients aged ≥ 25 years who had been admitted to an urban tertiary care hospital with a primary diagnosis of heart failure were analyzed. Creatinine and NT-proBNP were measured at admission and at discharge of the first admission. The patient demographics, co-morbidities, and length of stay were collected. The patients were prospectively grouped into 2 categories according to the acute changes in NT-proBNP: a decrease of ≥ 50% or <50% from admission to discharge. The primary composite outcome was readmission or death within 1 year of the first hospital admission. The unadjusted hazard ratio of readmission/death was 1.40 (95% confidence interval 0.97 to 2.01; p = 0.07) for those with a < 50% decrease in NT-proBNP compared to their counterparts with a ≥ 50% decrease. After adjustment for age, gender, race, and admission creatinine and NT-proBNP, the risk of readmission/death was 57% greater for those with a < 50% decrease (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 2.28; p = 0.02). An adjustment for co-morbidity, length of stay, and left ventricular ejection fraction did not significantly change this relation. Reductions in NT-proBNP of < 50% during an acute hospitalization for heart failure might be associated with an increased hazard of readmission/death, independent of age, gender, race, creatinine, admission NT-proBNP, co-morbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction, and length of stay. In conclusion, patients with a < 50% reduction in NT-proBNP might benefit from more intensive medical treatment, monitoring, and follow-up., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Before surgery, most patients receiving oral anticoagulation require temporary cessation of treatment. Physicians sometimes substitute heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin for oral anticoagulation in the perioperative setting ("bridging therapy"). We sought to characterize rates of bridging therapy use at 9 clinical centers to determine the extent to which the use of bridging is explained by clinical characteristics of patients (vs physician style) and to determine the 30-day incidence of thrombotic and bleeding complications., Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Periprocedural bridging anticoagulation was classified as none, prophylactic-dose heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin, or full-dose heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin. We collected data on patient and surgery characteristics, anticoagulation management, and thromboembolic and bleeding events., Results: A total of 492 of 497 consecutive patients completed the study; 54%, 14%, and 33% of patients had no, prophylactic, and full (therapeutic) doses, respectively, of heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin postprocedure. Two hospitals treated more than 80% of their patients with full-dose heparin, whereas the remaining 7 hospitals used full-dose heparin in an average of 22% of cases (P<.001); this variation persisted after adjustment for patient characteristics. There were 4 thromboembolic events (0.8%) and 16 major bleeding events (3.2%). Full-dose heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin postprocedure was associated with a higher likelihood of major bleeding: adjusted odds ratio 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-14.7)., Conclusion: Management of anticoagulation after an invasive procedure varies widely and is not explained by clinical characteristics of patients alone. The risk of major bleeding is strongly associated with the use of postoperative therapeutic doses of heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cystatin C is a novel marker of renal function that has been found to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in ambulatory patients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this biomarker predicts the length of hospitalization and adverse outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure. Two hundred forty consecutive patients aged > or =25 admitted to Johns Hopkins Hospital with exacerbations of heart failure were prospectively enrolled. Cystatin C levels were measured on admission. Patients were followed for 1 year. The primary outcome measure was the length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure. Cystatin C showed no significant association with the length of hospitalization. Patients in the highest quartile (quartile 4) of cystatin C level were at increased risk for death (hazard ratio 2.07 for quartile 4 vs quartiles 1 to 3, p = 0.01) and death or rehospitalization (hazard ratio 1.61 for quartile 4 vs quartiles 1 to 3, p = 0.01). The association between cystatin C and the combined end point of death or rehospitalization during 1-year follow-up remained significant after adjusting for age, race, gender, co-morbidities, and creatinine. Cystatin C was more predictive of these end points than creatinine, and the combination of cystatin C and creatinine was more predictive than either variable alone. In conclusion, cystatin C may be useful in addition to creatinine for predicting outcomes after admission for acute heart failure exacerbations.

The parasympathetic nervous system facilitates peripheral arterial vasodilation and is also responsible for a decrease in heart rate immediately after exercise (heart rate recovery [HRR]). The relation among parasympathetic tone measured by HRR after exercise, endothelium-mediated vasodilation, and nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilation (determined with brachial artery ultrasound) was assessed in 25 healthy young men. One-minute HRR was nonsignificantly related to endothelium-mediated vasodilation (r = -0.35, p = 0.08) but was significantly related to nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilation (r = -0.63, p = 0.0008), a finding that persisted after adjustment for heart rate at rest, insulin resistance, lipid variables, and blood pressure. This suggests that parasympathetic tone may be inversely related to the responsiveness of arterial smooth muscle to nitrates in healthy humans.

A night-time decrease in systolic blood pressure that differs <10% from mean daytime values ("nondipping") is associated with increased rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that insulin resistance would be associated with nondipping in patients who did not have frank diabetes mellitus or hypertension. We included 106 consecutive outpatients who had been referred for 24-hour ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure. Our data suggest that insulin resistance, defined as a high ratio of triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein, is associated with blunted diurnal blood pressure variation (odds ratio 6.3, 95% confidence interval 2.6 to 16.4, p <0.0001) before the development of abnormal levels of fasting blood glucose.

Purpose: To determine the utility and limitations of D-dimer testing for the evaluation of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients., Methods: We performed D-dimer testing by four different methods in unselected inpatients undergoing radiologic evaluation for possible venous thromboembolism. We included patients with a history of malignancy, recent surgery, thrombosis, and anticoagulation treatment. C-reactive protein levels were assayed as a measure of inflammation., Results: Of 45 patients with radiographically proven proximal deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, 43 had elevated D-dimer levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (sensitivity, 96%); the specificity of the test was 23% (36/157). The qualitative non-ELISA tests had higher specificities, but their sensitivities were <70%. Nineteen patients (42%) with thrombosis had false-negative D-dimer tests by at least one assay. The specificity of the tests decreased with increasing duration of hospitalization, increasing age, and increasing C-reactive protein levels. D-dimer testing had little or no utility in distinguishing patients with thrombosis from those without in patients who had been hospitalized for more than 3 days, were older than 60 years, or had C-reactive protein levels in the highest quartile., Conclusion: In unselected inpatients, D-dimer testing has limited clinical utility because of its poor specificity. This is particularly true for older patients, those who have undergone prolonged hospitalization, and those with markedly elevated C-reactive protein levels. In some patient subsets, a negative non-ELISA D-dimer test cannot discriminate between inpatients with and without thrombosis.