1. Comparison of conventional resection to D3 lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Raje P, Sonal S, Kunitake H, Berger DL, Lee GC, Ricciardi R, Morita S, Shigeta K, Okabayashi K, and Goldstone RN
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Japan epidemiology, United States epidemiology, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Survival Rate, Aged, 80 and over, Lymph Node Excision methods, Colonic Neoplasms surgery, Colonic Neoplasms pathology, Colonic Neoplasms mortality, Colectomy methods
- Abstract
Background: Lymphadenectomy during right hemicolectomy for colon cancer varies between the U.S. and Japan., Methods: Patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for non-metastatic right-sided colon cancer between 2010 and 2019 at U.S. and Japanese institutions were compared. Outcomes included survival, pathologic findings, and postoperative complications., Results: 319 American patients (57 % female, mean age 70 years) underwent conventional resection and 308 Japanese patients (52 % female, mean age 70 years) underwent extended dissection. The conventional group underwent more laparotomies (26.6 % vs. 8.4 %, p < 0.001), had more poorly differentiated histology (31.7 % vs. 11.0 %, p < 0.01), lower lymph node yield (M = 27 ± 11 vs. M = 32 ± 14, p < 0.001), and more 30-day readmissions (31 vs. 5, p < 0.001). Adjusting for demographics, pathology, perioperative outcomes, and adjuvant chemotherapy, extended lymphadenectomy improved disease-free survival (HR 0.50; 95 % CI, 0.31-0.80; p = 0.004), but not overall survival (HR 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.95-1.02; p = 0.14)., Conclusions: Extended lymphadenectomy for right sided-colon cancer improves disease-free, but not overall, survival among Japanese patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors confirm that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF