Search

To assess the results of a conservative coronary angioplasty strategy in unstable angina pectoris, the records of 1,421 consecutive patients without previous myocardial infarction undergoing a first percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) between 1986 and 1990 were reviewed. Of these patients, 631 had unstable and 790 had stable angina pectoris. Only after an intense effort to medically control symptoms, the unstable patients underwent PTCA at an average of 15.4 days (range 1 to 76) after hospital admission. Primary clinical success was achieved in 91.7% of patients with unstable and in 94.4% of those with stable angina pectoris (p = not significant). In-hospital mortality rates were 0.3 and 0.1%, respectively (p = not significant). Nonfatal in-hospital event rates for acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident and coronary bypass surgery were only slightly higher in patients with unstable angina pectoris; however, the difference from the stable group was significant when all events were combined (9 vs 5.9%; p less than 0.04). During 6-month follow-up, no significant difference in adverse events was found between the groups. The respective rates for the unstable and stable groups were 0.4 and 0.2% for death, 5.5 and 5.1% for major nonfatal events, and 17.7 and 20.1% for repeat PTCA. These results suggest that use of a conservative PTCA strategy in the treatment of patients with unstable angina pectoris results in favorable and similar immediate and 6-month outcomes compared with those in patients with stable angina pectoris.

To analyze the effect of the calcium antagonist diltiazem on coronary hemodynamics, epicardial coronary artery diameter, coronary blood flow and coronary blood flow velocity were assessed at baseline and after a 0.5 mg intracoronary bolus of diltiazem in nonstenotic coronary arteries of awake humans. Patients (n = 20) were first randomized to pretreatment with either placebo (n = 10) or isosorbide dinitrate (0.5 microgram/kg/min infusion; n = 10), and coronary flow reserve was measured before and after administration of diltiazem. There were significant increases in epicardial coronary artery diameter (10%; p = 0.0001) and coronary blood flow (30%; p = 0.0001) in all patients after administration of diltiazem. Whereas basal coronary blood flow velocity increased only slightly (7%; p = not significant), there was a significant decrease in coronary flow reserve (10%; p = 0.004). Increases in coronary diameter and blood flow after diltiazem were comparable in patients pretreated with placebo or nitrates. However, the decrease in coronary flow reserve was significant only in patients pretreated with placebo (19%; p = 0.0008). This reduction in coronary flow reserve could be due to "raising the floor" (increased baseline coronary blood flow) or "lowering the ceiling" (reduction of maximal coronary blood flow).