Search

A number of different treatments for neuropathic pain have been studied, but the literature is sizable, rapidly evolving, and lacks important information about practical aspects of patient management. Under the auspices of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG), a consensus process was used to develop evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain that take into account clinical efficacy, adverse effects, impact on health-related quality of life, convenience, and costs. On the basis of randomized clinical trials, medications recommended as first-line treatments for neuropathic pain included certain antidepressants (i.e., tricyclic antidepressants and dual reuptake inhibitors of both serotonin and norepinephrine), calcium channel alpha(2)-delta ligands (i.e., gabapentin and pregabalin), and topical lidocaine. Opioid analgesics and tramadol were recommended as second-line treatments that can be considered for first-line use in selected clinical circumstances. Other medications that generally would be used as third-line treatments include certain other antidepressant and antiepileptic medications, topical capsaicin, mexiletine, and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists. Two other national and international associations recently published pharmacologic treatment guidelines for neuropathic pain, which are summarized and contrasted with the NeuPSIG recommendations. Recent guidelines for the use of neurostimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain also are summarized. For all treatments for neuropathic pain, long-term studies, head-to-head comparisons, and studies of treatment combinations are a priority for future research.

Purpose: Meperidine is a commonly used analgesic despite unique disadvantages compared with other opioid analgesics. The objective of this study was to measure the effects of a meperidine formulary restriction on the prescribing of parenteral opioid analgesics., Materials and Methods: The study was performed at a single 750-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in Rochester, NY. The formulary restriction limited meperidine to use exclusively for rigors or procedural sedation and was supported by an educational initiative and a computerized order entry system. Independent computerized pharmacy records were used to capture all doses of parenteral morphine, meperidine, and hydromorphone administered to patients in the emergency department or on a medical or surgical inpatient floor during data-collection periods. Baseline data were collected during two 3-day periods before the formulary restriction; then comparison data were collected during three 3-day periods over 15 months after the formulary restriction., Results: The number of administered doses of meperidine per day decreased from 37.5 (20.8% of parenteral opioid doses before the restriction) to 0.22 (0.1% of parenteral opioid doses, P = .001). The total number of opioid doses and morphine doses given did not change, whereas the number of hydromorphone doses increased significantly postrestriction, from 16.0 doses per day (8.9% of total) to 59.7 doses per day (29.5%) (P = .009)., Conclusion: Meperidine formulary restriction, supported by an educational program and computerized order entry, effectively eliminated analgesic meperidine use. Hydromorphone use increased proportionately to offset the decreased use of meperidine.