Search

Background: Implementation of resident duty hour policies has resulted in a need to document work hours accurately. We compared the number of self-reported duty hour violations identified through an anonymous, resident-administered survey to that obtained from a standardized, ACGME-sanctioned electronic tracking system., Methods: 10 cross-sectional surveys were administered to general surgery residents over five years. A resident representative collected and de-identified the data., Results: A median of 54 residents (52% male) participated per cohort. 429 responses were received (79% response rate). 111 violations were reported through the survey, while the standardized electronic system identified 76, a trend significantly associated with PGY-level (p < 0.001) and driven by first-year residents (n = 81 versus 37, p = 0.001)., Conclusions: An anonymous, resident-run mechanism identifies significantly more self-reported violations than a standardized electronic tracking system alone. This argues for individual program evaluation of duty hour tracking mechanisms to correct systematic issues that could otherwise lead to repeated violations., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: "Academic surgeon" describes a member of a medical school department of surgery, but this term does not fully define the important role of such physician-scientists in advancing surgical science through translational research and innovation., Methods: The curriculum vitae and self-descriptive vignettes of the records of achievement of seven surgeons possessing documented records of academic leadership, innovation, and dissemination of knowledge were reviewed., Results: Out analysis yielded seven attributes of the archetypal academic surgeon: 1) identifies complex clinical problems ignored or thought unsolvable by others, 2) becomes an expert, 3) innovates to advance treatment, 4) observes outcomes to further improve and innovate, 5) disseminates knowledge and expertise, 6) asks important questions to further improve care, and 7) trains the next generation of surgeons and scientists., Conclusion: Although alternative pathways to innovation and academic contribution also exist, the academic surgeon typically devotes years of careful observation, analysis, and iterative investigation to identify and solve challenging or unexplored clinical problems, ideally leverages resources available in academic medical centers to support these endeavors., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although early revascularization improves outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndromes, the role of revascularization for patients with nonacute coronary artery disease is controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare surgical or percutaneous revascularization with medical therapy alone to determine the impact of revascularization on death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease., Methods: The Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched to identify randomized trials of coronary revascularization (either surgical or percutaneous) versus medical therapy alone in patients with nonacute coronary disease reporting the individual outcomes of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction reported at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. A random effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) for the 2 prespecified outcomes., Results: Twenty-eight studies published from 1977 to 2007 were identified for inclusion in the analysis; the revascularization modality was percutaneous coronary intervention in 17 studies, coronary bypass grafting in 6 studies, and either strategy in 5 studies. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 10 years with a median of 3 years. The 28 trials enrolled 13,121 patients, of whom 6476 were randomized to revascularization and 6645 were randomized to medical therapy alone. The OR for revascularization versus medical therapy for mortality was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.88). A stratified analysis according to revascularization mode revealed both bypass grafting (OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.77) and percutaneous intervention (OR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.99) to be superior to medical therapy with respect to mortality. Revascularization was not associated with a significant reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction compared with medical therapy (OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.15)., Conclusion: Revascularization by coronary bypass surgery or percutaneous intervention in conjunction with medical therapy in patients with nonacute coronary artery disease is associated with significantly improved survival compared with medical therapy alone.

A review of the discharge diagnoses and mycobacterial cultures of patients admitted to a major New York City hospital over an 18-month period revealed 21 patients with abdominal mycobacterial infections (17 male, 4 female) with an average age of 36 years. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or an identifiable AIDS risk was present in 14. The disease was manifest by peritoneal (eight patients), ileocecal (seven), and hepatic involvement (three), and psoas abscess (three). Diffuse abdominal pain was the most frequent presenting symptom. However, absence of pain (19 percent) and lack of abdominal findings (28 percent) were not uncommon. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly elevated (mean 72 mm/hour), whereas the white blood cell count was normal in 18 patients. Computed tomography findings were abnormal in all patients studied and suggested mycobacterial infection in 67 percent. Ten patients (48 percent) required surgery. Although there were no individual differences in clinical or laboratory presentation between the operative and nonoperative patient groups, more patients with pain and higher fever were operated upon. There was one postoperative death. The overall mortality rate was 24 percent, and the mean survival and follow-up 10.2 months and 12.2 months, respectively.