1. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
- Author
-
Karacsonyi J, Deffenbacher K, Benzuly KH, Flaherty JD, Alaswad K, Basir M, Megaly MS, Jaffer F, Doshi D, Poommipanit P, Khatri J, Patel M, Riley R, Sheikh A, Wollmuth JR, Korngold E, Uretsky BF, Yeh RW, Chandwaney RH, Elguindy AM, Tammam K, AbiRafeh N, Schmidt CW, Okeson B, Kostantinis S, Simsek B, Rangan BV, Brilakis ES, and Schimmel DR
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left, Registries, Coronary Angiography, Chronic Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects, Coronary Occlusion diagnosis, Coronary Occlusion surgery, Coronary Occlusion etiology
- Abstract
The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. We analyzed the clinical and angiographic characteristics, and procedural outcomes of 7,171 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2021 at 35 international centers. Mean age was 64.5 ± 10 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 50 ± 13%. MCS was used in 4.5%, prophylactically in 78.7%, and urgently in 21.3%. The most common type of MCS overall was Impella CP (Abiomed) (55.5%), followed by intra-aortic balloon pump (14.8%) and TandemHeart (LivaNova Inc.) (10.0%). Prophylactic MCS patients were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (55% vs 42%, p <0.001) and had more complex lesions compared with cases without prophylactic MCS (Japan-CTO score: 2.80 ± 1.22 vs 2.39 ± 1.27, p <0.001). Cases with prophylactic MCS had similar technical (86% vs 87%, p = 0.643) but lower procedural (80% vs 86%, p = 0.028) success rates and higher rates of periprocedural major cardiac adverse events compared with no prophylactic MCS use (6.55% vs 1.68%, p <0.001). Urgent MCS use was associated with lower technical (68% vs 87%, p <0.001) and procedural (39% vs 86%, p <0.001) success rates and higher major cardiac adverse events compared with no-MCS use (32.26% vs 1.68%, p <0.001). The differences persisted in multivariable analyses. In summary, in this contemporary multicenter registry, MCS was used in 4.5% of CTO PCIs, mostly prophylactically (78.7%). Elective MCS cases had similar technical success but a higher risk of complications. Urgent MCS cases had lower technical and procedural success and higher periprocedural major complication rates., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF