Search

The defibrillation threshold (DFT) and upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) were determined using step-down protocols in 50 patients who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement or testing. The sensitivity and specificity of each ULV energy level was assessed for detecting an increased DFT, correlation of the DFT and ULV, and optimal shock timing for ULV determination. A ULV <10 or 11 J (failure to induce ventricular fibrillation with 10- to 11-J shocks) was 100% predictive of an acceptable DFT and may be sufficient to exclude unacceptable DFTs in 60% of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients. All 4 shocks used to scan the peak of the T wave during ULV testing were necessary for accurate ULV determination.

Current use of newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has changed the spectrum of pacemaker-ICD interactions and provided new tools for testing and understanding those interactions. Testing for pacemaker-ICD interactions was performed in 31 procedures involving 22 patients. The protocol included: (1) evaluation of pacemaker stimulus artifact amplitude and its ratio to that of the evoked ventricular electrogram, (2) testing for inhibition of ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection by the ICD during asynchronous pacing at maximum output, (3) evaluation by pacemaker event marker recordings of pacemaker sensing behavior while programmed to nonasynchronous mode during ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF, and (4) evaluation of postshock interactions. Inhibition of detection of VT/VF was found in 6 of 22 patients (27.2%). Large stimulus artifact amplitude (>2 mV) or stimulus artifact:evoked QRS ratio > 1/3 had a positive predictive accuracy of 18% and 14.4%, respectively, and a negative predictive accuracy of 100% and 92.3%, respectively, for clinically significant interaction. Asynchronous pacing occurred in 16 of 31 procedures (51.6%), and was due to underdetection by the pacemaker in 4 of 16 (25%) and noise reversion in 12 of 16 (75%). Postshock phenomena occurred in 6 cases, 3 of which were clinically significant. Overall, 11 of 22 patients (50%) had clinically significant interactions discovered by this protocol, which led to system revisions in 6 and to pacemaker output reprogramming in 5. Thus, pacemaker-ICD interactions are frequently detected using a thorough and systematic protocol. Most cases can be managed by system revision or pacemaker reprogramming.

One hundred ten patients with asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) were evaluated prospectively to assess the value of electrophysiologic testing. This testing consisted of up to 3 extrastimuli delivered during 3 drive cycle lengths from 2 right ventricular sites. A positive study was defined as monomorphic VT lasting 30 seconds or requiring cardioversion. Patients with a positive study were treated, and serial drug testing was done. An event during follow-up was sustained VT or cardiac arrest. The mean follow-up was 15 months. Of 57 patients with an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 40%, 6 had a positive electrophysiologic test with 1 event and 51 had a negative test with 1 event. Twenty-eight patients had an ejection fraction less than 40% and coronary artery disease: 14 had a positive test with 1 event, and 14 had a negative test with 3 events. Twenty-five patients had an ejection fraction less than 40% and no coronary artery disease: 1 had a positive test with no events, and 24 had a negative test with 8 events. Only ejection fraction and congestive heart failure class were found to be independent predictors of outcome. Patients with an ejection fraction greater than 40% had low inducibility (11%), had few events (3.5%) and did not require electrophysiologic testing. In patients with an ejection fraction less than 40% and coronary artery disease, inducibility was high (50%) and a negative study was of no value. Patients with an ejection fraction less than 40% and no coronary artery disease had low inducibility (4%), had frequent events (33%) and did not benefit from electrophysiologic testing.

The records of 22 patients with transient atrioventricular (AV) block after open-heart surgery for congenital heart disease from 1972 to 1978 were reviewed to determine the natural history of this entity. Preoperatively, no patient had AV block; 3 had right bundle branch block (BBB), 1 had left BBB and 5 had nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. Complete AV block developed in 20 patients and Mobitz II AV block in 2. Transient AV block occurred intraoperatively in 14 patients and within 48 hours postoperatively in 8; AV block persisted for greater than or equal to 48 hours postoperatively in all patients, for a mean of 7.3 days (range 2 to 28). During a follow-up of 5.5 years (range 2.5 to 10), late AV block developed in 2 patients. None of the 18 patients whose escape QRS complex morphology during AV block was similar to the final QRS complex during normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation with AV conduction had late AV block, whereas 2 of the 4 in whom it differed did (p less than 0.01). There was no difference in the escape rate between the 2 groups. Thus, late development of high-grade AV block is infrequent among patients with transient postoperative AV block. An escape QRS complex during postoperative AV block that differs from the QRS complex seen on recovery of normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation with anterograde conduction may identify those at high risk of late AV block.