Search

The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial of prehospital versus hospital administration of thrombolytic therapy markedly reduced hospital treatment times, but the 2 groups had similar outcomes. However, patients treated < 70 minutes from symptom onset had better short-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term influence of very early thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction. A total of 360 patients were followed for vital status and cardiac-related hospital admissions over a period of 34 +/- 16 months. Patients enrolled in the trial had symptoms for < or = 6 hours, ST-segment elevation on the prehospital electrocardiogram, and no risk factors for serious bleeding. They received aspirin and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator either before or after hospital arrival. Primary end points in this study included long-term survival and survival free of death or readmission to the hospital for angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or revascularization. Two-year survival was 89% for prehospital- and 91% for hospital-treated patients (p = 0.46). Event-free survival at 2 years was 56% and 64% for prehospital- and hospital-treated patients, respectively (p = 0.42). In patients treated < 70 minutes from symptom onset, 2-year survival was 98%, and it was 88% for those treated later (p = 0.12). Two-year event-free survival was 65% for patients treated early and 59% for patients treated later (p = 0.80). In this trial, poorer long-term survival was associated with advanced age, history of congestive heart failure, and coronary artery bypass surgery performed before the index hospitalization, but not with time to treatment.

This study compared the presentation (symptoms and signs), treatment, and outcome of 1,097 consecutive patients (851 men and 246 women) from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project Registry with confirmed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), all of whom were initially evaluated in the prehospital setting, met clinical criteria for possible thrombolysis, and were followed throughout their hospital course. Women were older than men and had a higher prevalence of known cardiovascular risk factors, including systemic hypertension and congestive heart failure. The presentation of AMI with respect to symptoms, delay, and hemodynamic and electrocardiographic findings was for the most part indistinguishable between mean and women. Women appeared "undertreated" early in the course of AMI and were half as likely as men to undergo acute catheterization, angioplasty, thrombolysis, or coronary bypass surgery (odds ratio 0.5 [0.3 to 0.7]). The risk for hospital mortality in women was almost twice that for men (odds ratio 1.95 [1.01 to 3.8]). Hospital mortality after AMI was also independently predicted by older age, early evidence of hemodynamic instability, and an intraventricular conduction abnormality on the initial electrocardiogram. Although similar in its presentation, AMI in women is not as aggressively treated, and results in a less favorable outcome than in men. Gender as well as nongender-specific risk factors are important in assessing risk and the likelihood of early intervention after AMI.