Search

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of quantifying visceral adipose tissue (VAT) on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, using freeware, as well as calculating intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. Materials and Methods: We quantified VAT in patients who underwent abdominal CT and MRI at our institution between 2010 and 2015, with a maximum of three months between the two examinations. A slice acquired at the level of the umbilicus was selected. Segmentation was performed with the region growing algorithm of the freeware employed. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were evaluated, as was the accuracy of MRI in relation to that of CT. Results: Thirty-one patients (14 males and 17 females; mean age of 57 ± 15 years) underwent CT and MRI (mean interval between the examinations, 28 ± 12 days). The interobserver reproducibility was 82% for CT (bias = 1.52 cm2; p = 0.488), 86% for T1-weighted MRI (bias = −4.36 cm2; p = 0.006), and 88% for T2-weighted MRI (bias = −0.52 cm2; p = 0.735). The intraobserver reproducibility was 90% for CT (bias = 0.14 cm2; p = 0.912), 92% for T1-weighted MRI (bias = −3,4 cm2; p = 0.035), and 90% for T2-weighted MRI (bias = −0.30 cm2; p = 0.887). The reproducibility between T1-weighted MRI and T2-weighted MRI was 87% (bias = −0.11 cm2; p = 0.957). In comparison with the accuracy of CT, that of T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI was 89% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: The program employed can be used in order to quantify VAT on CT, T1-weighted MRI, and T2-weighted MRI scans. Overall, the accuracy of MRI (in comparison with that of CT) appears to be high, as do intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. However, the quantification of VAT seems to be less reproducible in T1-weighted sequences. Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a viabilidade da quantificação do tecido adiposo visceral (TAV) pela tomografia computadorizada (TC) e ressonância magnética (RM) usando um software freeware, e também calcular a reprodutibilidade intraobservador e interobservador. Materiais e Métodos: Foi quantificado o TAV em pacientes submetidos a TC e RM de abdome em nossa instituição, entre 2010 e 2015, com um intervalo máximo de três meses entre os dois exames. Selecionou-se um corte adquirido ao nível da cicatriz umbilical. A segmentação foi realizada com o algoritmo de crescimento de região do freeware utilizado. As reprodutibilidades intraobservador e interobservador foram avaliadas, assim como a acurácia da RM em relação à TC. Resultados: Trinta e um pacientes (14 homens e 17 mulheres; média de idade: 57 ± 15 anos) realizaram TC e RM (intervalo médio entre os exames: 28 ± 12 dias). A reprodutibilidade interobservador foi 82% para TC (viés = 1,52 cm2; p = 0,488), 86% para RM ponderada em T1 (viés = −4,36 cm2; p = 0,006) e 88% para RM ponderada em T2 (viés = −0,52 cm2; p = 0,735). A reprodutibilidade intraobservador foi 90% para TC (viés = 0,14 cm2; p = 0,912), 92% para RM ponderada em T1 (viés = −3,4 cm2; p = 0,035) e 90% para RM ponderada em T2 (viés = −0,30 cm2, p = 0,887). A reprodutibilidade entre a RM ponderada em T1 e a RM ponderada em T2 foi 87% (viés = −0,11 cm2; p = 0,957). Em comparação com a TC, a acurácia da RM ponderada em T1 e T2 foi 89% e 91%, respectivamente. Conclusão: O programa utilizado pode ser usado para quantificar o TAV na TC, na RM ponderada em T1 e na RM ponderada em T2. No geral, a acurácia da RM (em comparação com a TC) parece ser alta, assim como a reprodutibilidade intraobservador e interobservador. No entanto, a quantificação do TAV parece ser menos reprodutível nas sequências ponderadas em T1.

Objective: To measure the interobserver reproducibility of the radiographic evaluation of lumbar spine instability. Methods: Measurements of the dynamic radiographs of the lumbar spine in lateral view were performed, evaluating the anterior translation and the angulation among the vertebral bodies. The tests were evaluated at workstations of the organization, through the Carestream Health Vue RIS (PACS), version 11.0.12.14 Inc. 2009© system. Results: Agreement in detecting cases of radiographic instability among the observers varied from 88.1 to 94.4%, and the agreement coefficients AC1 were all above 0.8, indicating excellent agreement. Conclusion: The interobserver analysis performed among orthopedic surgeons with different levels of training in dynamic radiographs of the spine obtained high reproducibility and agreement. However, some factors, such as the manual method of measurement and the presence of vertebral osteophytes, might have generated a few less accurate results in this comparative evaluation of measurements. RESUMO Objetivo: Mensurar a reprodutibilidade interobservadores da avaliação radiográfica da instabilidade da coluna lombar. Métodos: Foram realizadas mensurações das radiografias dinâmicas de coluna lombar na incidência em perfil, avaliando-se a translação anterior e a angulação entre os corpos vertebrais. Os exames foram avaliados em workstations da própria instituição, por meio do sistema Vue RIS (PACS) da Carestream Health, versão 11.0.12.14 Inc. 2009©. Resultados: A proporção de concordância em detecção de casos de instabilidade radiográfica entre os observadores variou de 88,1 a 94,4%, e os coeficientes de concordância AC1 estiveram todos acima de 0,8, indicando concordância excelente. Conclusão: A análise interobservadores realizada entre médicos ortopedistas com diferentes níveis de treinamento em radiografias dinâmicas da coluna vertebral obteve elevada reprodutibilidade e concordância. No entanto, alguns fatores, como método manual de aferição e a presença de osteófitos vertebrais, podem ter gerado alguns resultados menos consistentes nessa avaliação comparativa de medidas.

BACKGROUND: Dysplastic nevi are among the most important cutaneous melanoma simulators. They are important risk markers for this neoplasia and can be its potential precursors. Some authors found a statistically significant relationship between the degree of dysplasia and the risk for developing melanoma. However, reproducibility of grading criteria ranged from poor to fair in the researched articles. OBJECTIVE: To test the reproducibility of the grading criteria proposed by Sagebiel et al. regarding dysplastic nevi. METHODS: Histological specimens of 75 dysplastic nevi were graded, independently and in a blinded fashion, according to preestablished criteria, by a panel of 10 pathologists with different levels of experience. Diagnostic agreement was calculated using weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The average of weighted kappa values was 0.13 for all observers, 0.12 for dermatopathologists, 0.18 for general pathologists and 0.05 for residents. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.2 for all observers, 0.18 for dermatopathologists, 0.33 for general pathologists and 0.15 for residents. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathological grading for dysplastic nevi was not reproducible in this Brazilian series, so the criteria used are not a helpful histopathological parameter for clinicopathological correlation. FUNDAMENTOS: Nevos displásicos estão entre os mais importantes simuladores de melanoma. São marcadores de risco para o desenvolvimento dessa neoplasia e podem ser seus precursores. Alguns autores observaram uma relação estatisticamente significativa entre o grau de displasia e o risco de desenvolvimento de melanoma. No entanto, a reprodutibilidade dos critérios para graduação variou de ruim a razoável nos artigos consultados. OBJETIVO: Testar a reprodutibilidade da graduação proposta por Sagebiel et al. para os nevos displásicos. MÉTODOS: Seções histológicas de setenta e cinco nevos displásicos foram graduadas, de forma independente e anônima, segundo critérios pré-estabelecidos, por um painel de 10 patologistas com diferentes níveis de experiência. A concordância diagnóstica foi calculada usando os coeficientes de kappa ponderado e de correlação intraclasse. RESULTADOS: A média dos valores de kappa ponderado foi de 0,13 para todos os observadores, de 0,12 para os dermatopatologistas, de 0,18 para os patologistas gerais e de 0,05 para os residentes. Os valores dos coeficientes de correlação intraclasse foram 0,2 para todos os observadores, 0,18 para os dermatopatologistas, 0,33 para os patologistas gerais e 0,15 para os residentes. CONCLUSÕES: A graduação histopatológica dos nevos displásicos não foi reprodutível nesta série brasileira. Portanto, os critérios utilizados não são úteis para correlação clínico-patológica.

OBJETIVO: Adaptar culturalmente e avaliar a reprodutibilidade da Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS) para o português do Brasil. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada a tradução da versão original em língua inglesa para o português. A versão traduzida foi aplicada em 8 voluntários fumantes para a adaptação cultural. Após ajustes, a versão da WSWS foi submetida à tradução retrógrada do português para o inglês. A versão em português do Brasil foi considerada adequada. Para a avaliação da reprodutibilidade, a escala foi aplicada em 75 fumantes em dois momentos, com intervalo de 30 minutos (reprodutibilidade interobservador) e, num terceiro momento, após 15 dias (reprodutibilidade intraobservador). Utilizou-se o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) para testar a concordância entre as respostas. O nível de significância adotado foi p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Dos 75 voluntários, 43 (57,3%) eram do gênero feminino. A média geral de idade foi 46,3 anos. A reprodutibilidade interobservador e intraobservador foi determinada para cada um dos sete domínios da WSWS, com CCI variando de, respectivamente, 0,87 a 0,94 e de 0,76 a 0,92. O tempo médio de resposta da WSWS foi 6 min e 44 s, e o tempo de resposta para cada questão variou de 4,2 a 12,6 s. CONCLUSÕES: A versão da WSWS para o português do Brasil é reprodutível, de aplicação rápida e simples, podendo ser utilizada como um instrumento de avaliação da gravidade dos sintomas da síndrome da abstinência à nicotina. OBJECTIVE: To cross-culturally adapt the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS) for use in Brazil and evaluate the reproducibility of the new (Brazilian Portuguese-language) version. METHODS: The original English version of the WSWS was translated into Brazilian Portuguese. For cross-cultural adaptation, the Brazilian Portuguese-language version of the WSWS was administered to eight volunteers, all of whom were smokers. After adjustments had been made, the WSWS version was back-translated into English. The Brazilian Portuguese-language version was thereby found to be accurate. The final Brazilian Portuguese-language version of the WSWS was applied to 75 smokers at three distinct times. For the assessment of interobserver reproducibility, it was applied twice within a 30-min interval by two different interviewers. For the assessment of intraobserver reproducibility, it was applied again 15 days later by one of the interviewers. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used in order to test the concordance of the answers. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 75 volunteers, 43 (57.3%) were female. The overall mean age was 46.3 years. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility was determined for each of the WSWS seven domains, the ICCs for which ranged from 0.87 to 0.94 and from 0.76 to 0.92, respectively. The mean time to completion of the WSWS was 6 min and 44 s, and the response time per question ranged from 4.2 to 12.6 s. CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian Portuguese-language version of the WSWS is reproducible, fast, and simple. It can therefore be used as a tool for assessing the severity of the symptoms of nicotine withdrawal syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional power Doppler sonography (3D power Doppler) in the assessment of fetal brain blood flow in the middle cerebral artery territory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was developed with 20 healthy pregnant women between 26 and 34 gestational weeks. The middle cerebral artery territory closest to the transducer was scanned and the blood flow volume was calculated with the method Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis. The following 3D power Doppler indices were later obtained: vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization-flow index (VFI). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were utilized for calculating the intra- and interobserver variability. RESULTS: A good intra- and interobserver agreement was observed, with ICC > 0.90 for all the 3D power Doppler indices: VI [ICC = 0.992 (CI 95%: 0.981-0.997)], FI [ICC = 0.999 (CI 95%: 0.998-0.999)], VFI [ICC = 0.995 (CI 95%: 0.987-0.998)]. Interobserver reproducibility: VI [ICC = 0.988 (CI 95%: 0.970-0.995)], FI [ICC = 0.999 (CI 95%: 0.997- 1.000)], VFI [ICC = 0.994 (CI 95%: 0.994-0.998)]. CONCLUSION: 3D power Doppler has shown to be a practical and easy method in the assessment of fetal brain blood flow, with good intra- and interobserver reproducibility. The FI presented the best intra- and interobserver agreement

PuRPOse: to compare the intra and interobserver reproducibility of the total thickness measurement of the inferior uterine segment (IUS), through the abdominal route, and of the muscle layer measurement, through the vaginal route, using bi and tridimensional ultrasonography. MethOds: the IUS thickness measurement of 30 women, between the 36 th and 39 th weeks of gestation with previous caesarean section, done by two observers, was studied. Abdominal ultrasonography with the patient in both supine and lithotomy position was performed. In the sagittal section, the IUS was identified and four bidimensional images and two tridimensional blocks of the total thickness were collected through the abdominal route, and the same for the muscle layer, through the vaginal route. Tridimensional acquisitions were manipulated in the multiplanar mode. The time was measured with a chronometer. Reproducibility was evaluated by the computation of the absolute difference between measurements, the ratio of differences smaller than 1 mm, the intraclass coefficient (ICC), and the Bland and Altman’s concordance limits. Results: the average bidimensional measurement

INTRODUCTION: Gleason score, which has a high interobserver variability, is used to classify prostate cancer. The most recent consensus valued the tertiary Gleason pattern and recommended its use in the final score of needle biopsies (modified Gleason score). This pattern is considered to be of high prognostic value in surgical specimens. This study emphasized the evaluation of the modified score agreement in needle biopsies and in surgical specimen, as well as the interobserver variability of this score MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three pathologists evaluated the slides of needle biopsies and surgical specimens of 110 patients, reporting primary, secondary and tertiary Gleason patterns and after that, traditional and modified Gleason scores were calculated. Kappa test (K) assessed the interobserver agreement and the agreement between the traditional and modified scores of the biopsy and of the surgical specimen RESULTS: Interobserver agreement in the biopsy was K = 0.36 and K = 0.35, and in the surgical specimen it was K = 0.46 and K = 0.36, for the traditional and modified scores, respectively. The tertiary Gleason grade was found in 8%, 0% and 2% of the biopsies and in 8%, 0% and 13% of the surgical specimens, according to observers 1, 2 and 3, respectively. When evaluating the agreement of the traditional and modified Gleason scores in needle biopsy with both scores of the surgical specimen, a similar agreement was found through Kappa CONCLUSION: Contrary to what was expected, the modified Gleason score was not superior in the agreement between the biopsy score and the specimen, or in interobserver reproducibility, in this study.