Search

Background: Phantom limb pain (PLP) management has been a challenge due to its response heterogeneity and lack of treatment access. This study will evaluate the feasibility of a remotely home-based M1 anodal tDCS combined with motor imagery in phantom limb patients and assess the preliminary efficacy, safety, and predictors of response of this therapy., Methods: This is a pilot, single-arm, open-label trial in which we will recruit 10 subjects with phantom limb pain. The study will include 20 sessions. All participants will receive active anodal M1 tDCS combined with phantom limb motor imagery training. Our primary outcome will be the acceptability and feasibility of this combined intervention. Moreover, we will assess preliminary clinical (pain intensity) and physiological (motor inhibition tasks and heart rate variability) changes after treatment. Finally, we will implement a supervised statistical learning (SL) model to identify predictors of treatment response (to tDCS and phantom limb motor imagery) in PLP patients. We will also use data from our previous clinical trial (total observations=224 [n=112 x timepoints = 2)) for our statistical learning algorithms. The new prospective data from this open-label study will be used as an independent test dataset., Discussion: This protocol proposes to assess the feasibility of a novel, neuromodulatory combined intervention that will allow the design of larger remote clinical trials, thus increasing access to safe and effective treatments for PLP patients. Moreover, this study will allow us to identify possible predictors of pain response and PLP clinical endotypes., Competing Interests: 4 Conflict of Interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Background: The use of exercise is a potential treatment option to modulate pain (exercise-induced hypoalgesia). The pain threshold (PT) response is a measure of pain sensitivity that may be a useful marker to assess the effect of physical exercise on pain modulation., Aim: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the PT response to exercise in healthy subjects., Methods: We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Lilacs, and Scopus using a search strategy with the following search terms: "exercise" OR "physical activity" AND "Pain Threshold" from inception to December 2nd, 2019. As criteria for inclusion of appropriate studies: randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that enrolled healthy subjects; performed an exercise intervention; assessed PT. Hedge's effect sizes of PT response and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed., Results: For the final analysis, thirty-six studies were included (n=1326). From this we found a significant and homogenous increase in PT in healthy subjects (ES=0.19, 95% CI= 0.11 to 0.27, I2=7.5%). According to subgroup analysis the effect was higher in studies: with women (ES=0.36); performing strength exercise (ES=0.34), and with moderate intensity (ES=0.27), and no differences by age were found. Confirmed by the meta-regression analysis., Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence of small to moderate effects of exercise on PT in healthy subjects, being even higher for moderate strength exercise and in women. These results support the idea of modulation of the endogenous pain system due to exercise and highlight the need of clinical translation to chronic pain population., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS STATEMENT The authors declare to have no compelling interests with this article.