Search

Patients with refractory relapsed multiple myeloma respond to combination treatment with elotuzumab and lenalidomide. The mechanisms underlying this observation are not fully understood. Furthermore, biomarkers predictive of response have not been identified to date. To address these issues, we used a humanized myeloma mouse model and adoptive transfer of human natural killer (NK) cells to show that elotuzumab and lenalidomide treatment controlled myeloma growth, and this was mediated through CD16 on NK cells. In co-culture studies, we showed that peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a subset of patients with refractory relapsed multiple myeloma were effective killers of OPM2 myeloma cells when treated with elotuzumab and lenalidomide, and this was associated with significantly increased expression of CD54 on OPM2 cells. Furthermore, elotuzumab- and lenalidomide-induced OPM2 cell killing and increased OPM2 CD54 expression were dependent on both monocytes and NK cells, and these effects were not mediated by soluble factors alone. At the transcript level, elotuzumab and lenalidomide treatment significantly increased OPM2 myeloma cell expression of genes for trafficking and adhesion molecules, NK cell activation ligands and antigen presentation molecules. In conclusion, our findings suggest that multiple myeloma patients require elotuzumab- and lenalidomide-mediated upregulation of CD54 on autologous myeloma cells, in combination with NK cells and monocytes to mediate an effective anti-tumor response. Furthermore, our data suggest that increased myeloma cell CD54 expression levels could be a powerful predictive biomarker for response to elotuzumab and lenalidomide treatment.

This study explored the novel immune checkpoint poliovirus receptor- related immunoglobulin domain-containing (PVRIG) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We showed that AML patient blasts consistently expressed the PVRIG ligand (poliovirus receptor-related 2, PVRL2). Furthermore, PVRIG blockade significantly enhanced naural killer (NK)-cell killing of PVRL2+, poliovirus receptor (PVR)lo AML cell lines, and significantly increased NK-cell activation and degranulation in the context of patient primary AML blasts. However, in AML patient bone marrow, NK-cell PVRIG expression levels were not increased. In order to understand how PVRIG blockade might potentially be exploited therapeutically, we investigated the biology of PVRIG and revealed that NK-cell activation resulted in reduced PVRIG expression on the cell surface. This occurred whether NK cells were activated by tumor cell recognition, cytokines (interleukin 2 [IL-2] and IL-12) or activating receptor stimulation (CD16 and NKp46). PVRIG was present at higher levels in the cytoplasm than on the cell surface, particularly on CD56bright NK cells, which further increased cytoplasmic PVRIG levels following IL-2 and IL-12 activation. PVRIG was continually transported to the cell surface via the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi in both unstimulated and activated NK cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that anti-PVRIG blocking antibody functions by binding to surface-bound PVRIG, which undergoes rapid turnover in both unstimulated and activated NK cells. We conclude that the PVRIG-PVRL2 immune checkpoint axis can feasibly be targeted with PVRIG blocking antibody for NK-mediated immunotherapy of PVRL2+ AML.