Search

The aim of this study was to analyze first year renal outcomes in a nationwide prospective multicenter cohort comprising 2215 renal transplants, with a special emphasis on the presence of pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). All transplants had a complete virtual crossmatch and DSA were detected in 19% (411/2215). The investigated composite endpoint was a poor first-year outcome defined as (i) allograft failure or (ii) death or (iii) poor allograft function (eGFR ≤25 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) at one year. Two hundred and twenty-one (221/2215; 10%) transplants showed a poor first-year outcome. Rejection (24/70; 34%) was the most common reason for graft failure. First-year patient's death was rare (48/2215; 2%). There were no statistically significant differences between DSA-positive and DSA-negative transplants regarding composite and each individual endpoint, as well as reasons for graft failure and death. DSA-positive transplants experienced more frequently rejection episodes, mainly antibody-mediated rejection (both P < 0.0001). The combination of DSA and any first year rejection was associated with the overall poorest death-censored allograft survival (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, presence of pre-transplant DSA per se does not affect first year outcomes. However, DSA-positive transplants experiencing first year rejection are a high-risk population for poor allograft survival and may benefit from intense clinical surveillance., (© 2021 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to investigate the short- and long-term impact of neutropenia occurring within the first year after kidney transplantation, with a special emphasis on different neutropenia grades. In this unselected cohort, 225/721 patients (31%) developed 357 neutropenic episodes within the first year post-transplant. Based on the nadir neutrophil count, patients were grouped as neutropenia grade 2 (<1.5-1.0*10 9 /l; n = 105), grade 3 (<1.0-0.5*10 9 /l; n = 65), and grade 4 (<0.5*10 9 /l; n = 55). Most neutropenia episodes were presumably drug-related (71%) and managed by reduction/discontinuation of potentially responsible drugs (mycophenolic acid [MPA] 51%, valganciclovir 25%, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 19%). Steroids were added/increased as replacement for reduced/discontinued MPA. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was only used in 2/357 neutropenia episodes (0.6%). One-year incidence of (sub)clinical rejection, one-year mortality, and long-term patient and graft survival were not different among patients without neutropenia and neutropenia grade 2/3/4. However, the incidence of infections was about 3-times higher during neutropenia grade 3 and 4, but not increased during grade 2. In conclusion, neutropenia within the first year after kidney transplantation represents no increased risk for rejection and has no negative impact on long-term patient and graft survival. Adding/increasing steroids as replacement for reduced/discontinued MPA might supplement management of neutropenia., (© 2021 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT.)

Solid-phase assays for human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibody detection have clearly revolutionized the field of HLA diagnostics and transplantation. The key advantages are a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of HLA antibodies compared with cell-based assays, as well as the potential for standardization. Solid-phase assays enabled the broad introduction of tools such as "virtual crossmatching" and "calculated panel reactive antibodies," which are essential components in many organ allocation systems, kidney-paired donation programs, and center-specific immunological risk stratification procedures. The most advanced solid-phase assays are the so-called single antigen beads (SAB). They are available now for more than 15 years, and the transplant community embraced their significant advantages. However, SAB analysis and interpretation is complex and many pitfalls have to be considered. In this review, we will discuss problems, limitations, and challenges using SAB. Furthermore, we express our wishes for the improvements of SAB as well as their future use for immunological assessment and research purposes., (© 2019 Steunstichting ESOT.)