Search

BackgroundPolytrauma and hemorrhagic shock can lead to direct and indirect liver damage involving intricate pathophysiologic mechanisms. While hepatic function has been frequently highlighted, there is minimal research on how the receptor activator of the NF-κB (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) system is regulated in the liver following trauma. Furthermore, cross-talking complement and toll-like-receptor (TLR) systems can contribute to the posttraumatic response. Therefore, we investigated the hepatic consequences of polytrauma focusing on the RANK-RANKL-OPG axis, and evaluated the effects of a dual blockade of complement factor C5 and TLR-cofactor CD14 on hepatic features.MethodsThe established pig model of polytrauma (PT) and hemorrhagic shock included pulmonary contusion, hepatic dissection, and bilateral femur fractures, surgically addressed either by external fixation (Fix ex) or intramedullary nailing (Nail). Four groups were investigated: 1) sham animals; 2) PT treated by Fix ex (Fix ex); 3) PT by Nail (Nail); or 4) PT by Nail plus combined C5/CD14 inhibition (Nail+Therapy). Serum samples were obtained between 0 - 72 h, and liver samples at 72 h after PT. Liver tissues were histologically scored and subjected to RT-qPCR-analyses, immunohistochemistry and ELISAs to evaluate the posttraumatic hepatic response with a focus on the RANK-RANKL-OPG system.ResultsFollowing PT, the liver injury score of the Nail+Therapy group was significantly lower than in the Fix ex or Nail group without immunomodulation (p

BackgroundDespite major advances in medicine, blood-borne biomarkers are urgently needed to support decision-making, including polytrauma. Here, we assessed serum-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) as potential markers of decision-making in polytrauma.ObjectiveOur Liquid Biopsy in Organ Damage (LiBOD) study aimed to differentiate polytrauma with organ injury from polytrauma without organ injury. We analysed of blood-borne small EVs at the individual level using a combination of immunocapture and high-resolution imaging.MethodsTo this end, we isolated, purified, and characterized small EVs according to the latest Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV) guidelines from human blood collected within 24 h post-trauma and validated our results using a porcine polytrauma model.ResultsWe found that small EVs derived from monocytes CD14+ and CD14+CD61+ were significantly elevated in polytrauma with organ damage. To be precise, our findings revealed that CD9+CD14+ and CD14+CD61+ small EVs exhibited superior performance compared to CD9+CD61+ small EVs in accurately indicating polytrauma with organ damage, reaching a sensitivity and a specificity of 0.81% and 0.97%, respectively. The results in humans were confirmed in an independent porcine model of polytrauma.ConclusionThese findings suggest that these specific types of small EVs may serve as valuable, non-invasive, and objective biomarkers for assessing and monitoring the severity of polytrauma and associated organ damage.

Dysfunctional complement activation and Toll-like receptor signaling immediately after trauma are associated with development of trauma-induced coagulopathy and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. We assessed the efficacy of the combined inhibition therapy of complement factor C5 and the TLR co-receptor CD14 on thrombo-inflammation and organ damage in an exploratory 72-h polytrauma porcine model, conducted under standard surgical and intensive care management procedures. Twelve male pigs were subjected to polytrauma, followed by resuscitation (ATLS® guidelines) and operation of the femur fracture (intramedullary nailing technique). The pigs were allocated to combined C5 and CD14 inhibition therapy group (n=4) and control group (n=8). The therapy group received intravenously C5 inhibitor (RA101295) and anti-CD14 antibody (rMil2) 30 min post-trauma. Controls received saline. Combined C5 and CD14 inhibition reduced the blood levels of the terminal complement complex (TCC) by 70% (p=0.004), CRP by 28% (p=0.004), and IL-6 by 52% (p=0.048). The inhibition therapy prevented the platelet consumption by 18% and TAT formation by 77% (p=0.008). Moreover, the norepinephrine requirements in the treated group were reduced by 88%. The inhibition therapy limited the organ damage, thereby reducing the blood lipase values by 50% (p=0.028), LDH by 30% (p=0.004), AST by 33%, and NGAL by 30%. Immunofluorescent analysis of the lung tissue revealed C5b-9 deposition on blood vessels in five from the untreated, and in none of the treated animals. In kidney and liver, the C5b-9 deposition was similarly detected mainly the untreated as compared to the treated animals. Combined C5 and CD14 inhibition limited the inflammatory response, the organ damage, and reduced the catecholamine requirements after experimental polytrauma and might be a promising therapeutic approach.

Physical trauma can be considered an unrecognized “pandemic” because it can occur anywhere and affect anyone and represents a global burden. Following severe tissue trauma, patients frequently develop acute lung injury (ALI) and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) despite modern surgical and intensive care concepts. The underlying complex pathophysiology of life-threatening ALI/ARDS has been intensively studied in experimental and clinical settings. However, currently, the coronavirus family has become the focus of ALI/ARDS research because it represents an emerging global public health threat. The clinical presentation of the infection is highly heterogeneous, varying from a lack of symptoms to multiple organ dysfunction and mortality. In a particular subset of patients, the primary infection progresses rapidly to ALI and ARDS. The pathophysiological mechanisms triggering and driving severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced ALI/ARDS are still poorly understood. Although it is also generally unknown whether insights from trauma-induced ARDS may be readily translated to SARS-CoV-2-associated ARDS, it was still recommended to treat coronavirus-positive patients with ALI/ARDS with standard protocols for ALI/ARDS. However, this strategy was questioned by clinical scientists, because it was documented that some severely hypoxic SARS-CoV-2-infected patients exhibited a normal respiratory system compliance, a phenomenon rarely observed in ARDS patients with another underlying etiology. Therefore, coronavirus-induced ARDS was defined as a specific ARDS phenotype, which accordingly requires an adjusted therapeutic approach. These suggestions reflect previous attempts of classifying ARDS into different phenotypes that might overall facilitate ARDS diagnosis and treatment. Based on the clinical data from ARDS patients, two major phenotypes have been proposed: hyper- and hypo-inflammatory. Here, we provide a comparative review of the pathophysiological pathway of trauma-/hemorrhagic shock-induced ARDS and coronavirus-induced ARDS, with an emphasis on the crucial key points in the pathogenesis of both these ARDS forms. Therefore, the manifold available data on trauma-/hemorrhagic shock-induced ARDS may help to better understand coronavirus-induced ARDS.