Search

ObjectiveAmong adolescents, amenorrhea is a common reason for medical consultation. Despite the variety of underlying etiologies, the prevalence of the causes is incompletely understood. This study aimed to assess the demographic and etiological factors among patients with amenorrhea treated in a single specialist unit of adolescent gynecology.DesignRetrospective register study.MethodsMedical records of 438 girls evaluated for primary or secondary amenorrhea in a single tertiary care center between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. In all, 423 patients—171 with primary amenorrhea and 252 with secondary amenorrhea—were included in the study. Data on underlying conditions, anthropometric variables, and selected hormonal markers were analyzed.ResultsFunctional hypogonadotropic hypogonadism was the most frequent reason for primary (56%) and secondary (78%) amenorrhea. It was mostly explained by lifestyle-related functional hypothalamic amenorrhea caused by disordered eating, intense exercise, energy deficiency, psychological stress, and their combinations.ConclusionMenstrual pattern is a significant indicator of overall health and well-being among adolescent girls and young women. Functional reasons behind primary and secondary amenorrhea are important to recognize. Treatment often requires long-term lifestyle modifications. The frequency of functional causes also implies that most amenorrhea cases are preventable.

IntroductionConstitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) is the most common reason for delayed puberty in healthy male adolescents. The main indication for medical treatment for this condition is psychosocial burden. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has addressed the impact of puberty-promoting treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among boys with CDGP.MethodsWe investigated HRQoL in 22 boys with CDGP, who participated in a randomized controlled trial in four Finnish pediatric endocrinology outpatient clinics between 2013 and 2017. The boys were randomized to receive either aromatase inhibitor letrozole (2.5mg/day; n=11) or intramuscular testosterone (1mg/kg/every 4 weeks; n=11) for 6 months and followed up to 12 months. HRQoL was assessed with a generic self-assessment 16D© instrument developed and validated for adolescents aged 12 to 15 years. The 16D includes 16 dimensions (vitality, sight, breathing, distress, hearing, sleeping, eating, discomfort and symptoms, speech, physical appearance, school and hobbies, mobility, friends, mental function, excretion and depression). The results were compared with an age-matched reference population that included 163 boys from the Finnish capital-city area. The study protocol is registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT01797718).ResultsAt baseline, the mean 16D score of the CDGP boys was similar to the age-matched reference population (0.95 vs 0.96, p=0.838). However, the physical appearance score (satisfaction with general appearance, height and weight) was significantly lower in the CDGP boys (0.75 vs 0.92, p=0.004) than their peers. Twelve months after treatment, Appearance had improved significantly (0.75 vs 0.87, p=0.004) and no HRQoL dimension was inferior compared to the age-matched reference population.DiscussionIn terms of HRQoL, the main impact of delayed puberty was dissatisfaction with physical appearance. Puberty promoting therapy was associated with a positive change in perceived appearance, with no clear difference between low-dose testosterone and letrozole treatments.

ObjectiveTo determine whether the timing of puberty associates with school performance.MethodsGrowth data on 13,183 children born between 1997 and 2002, were collected from child health clinics and school healthcare and school performance data from school records. Age at peak height velocity (PHV) marked pubertal timing. The relationships between age at PHV and average grades in mathematics, native language, English, and physical education from school years 6 (end of elementary school; age 11-12 years), 7 (start of middle school; 12-13 years), and 9 (end of middle school; 14-15 years) were modeled using generalized estimating equations and linear mixed models, adjusted for the month of birth and annual income and education levels in school catchment areas.ResultsThe mean (SD) age at PHV was 13.54 (1.17) years in boys and 11.43 (1.18) years in girls. In girls, age at PHV was associated with grades in mathematics (β=0.041–0.062, p