Search

Background: Adequate management of diabetes in patients with liver cirrhosis can be challenging. We conducted this study to investigate the liver-related long term outcomes of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) in patients with diabetes and cirrhosis.Methods: From National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan, we recruited propensity-score matched alpha-glucosidase inhibitor users and non-users from a cohort of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with compensated liver cirrhosis between 1 January 2000, and 31 December 2017, and followed them until 31 December 2018. Cox proportional hazards models with robust sandwich standard error estimates were used to assess the risk of main outcomes for alpha-glucosidase inhibitor users versus non-users.Results: The incidence rates of mortality during follow-up were 65.56 vs. 96.06 per 1,000 patient-years for alpha-glucosidase inhibitor users and non-users, respectively. The multivariable-adjusted model shows that alpha-glucosidase inhibitor users had significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56–0.71), hepatocellular carcinoma (aHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46–0.67), decompensated cirrhosis (aHR 0.74 95% CI 0.63–0.87), hepatic encephalopathy (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60–0.87), and hepatic failure (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62–0.88) than alpha-glucosidase inhibitor non-users. Patients who received alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for a cumulative duration of more than 364 days had significantly lower risks of these outcomes than non-users.Conclusion: Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor use was associated with a lower risk of mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatic failure in patients with diabetes and compensated cirrhosis. alpha-glucosidase inhibitors may be useful for the management of diabetes in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Large-scale prospective studies are required to verify our results.

Background: Previous findings on using Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) as an antidepressant were conflicting, lacking large-scale studies. We used population-based data to investigate depression and anxiety risk in diabetic patients receiving the medication.Methods: From claims records of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, we identified cohorts of 10,690 GLP1-RA users and 42,766 propensity score-matched patients without GLP1-RA use from patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) diagnosed in 2011–2017, matched by age, gender, index year, occupation, urbanization, comorbidities, and medications. Incidence, hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of depression and/or anxiety were estimated by the end of 2017.Results: The overall combined incidence of anxiety and/or depression was lower in GLP1-RA users than in non-users (6.80 versus 9.36 per 1,000 person-years), with an adjusted HR adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.67–0.95) after controlling for covariates. The absolute incidence reduction was greater in anxiety (2.13 per 1,000 person-years) than in depression (0.41 per 1,000 person-years). The treatment effectiveness was significant for women. Patients taking GLP1-RA for longer than 180 days had the incidence of anxiety reduced to 2.93 per 1,000 person-years, with an aHR of 0.41 (95%CI: 0.27–0.61), compared to non-users. Dulaglutide could significantly decrease risks of both anxiety and depression.Conclusion: Patients with DM receiving GLP1-RA therapy have a greater reduction of the risk of anxiety than that of depression. Our findings strengthen previous research that advocated possible anti-depressant or anxiolytic effects of GLP1-RA and may lead to improved treatment adherence among patients with DM.

PurposeTo compare the risks of chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), sight-threatening retinopathy, and leg amputation between patients with diabetes or hypertension.MethodsFrom January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2015, we identified 28943 matched pairs of patients with diabetes with and without subsequent hypertension, 89102 pairs of patients with hypertension with and without subsequent diabetes, and 145294 pairs of patients with coexisting diabetes and hypertension with a previous history of diabetes or hypertension from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. Cox proportional-hazard models were used for calculating the risks of CKD, sight-threatening retinopathy, and leg amputation.ResultsThe mean follow-up time of this study in different cohorts was between 3.59 and 4.28 years. In diabetes patients with vs. without subsequent hypertension, hypertension patients with vs. without subsequent diabetes, and comorbid diabetes and hypertension patients with previous diabetes vs. with previous hypertension, the adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for CKD were 2.77 (2.61-2.94), 1.73 (1.68-1.77), and 1.04 (1.02-1.07); for ESRD were 42.38 (22.62-79.4), 2.76 (2.43-3.13), and 0.72 (0.66-0.79); for sight-threatening retinopathy were 2.07 (1.85-2.3), 3.41 (3.14-3.71), and for leg amputation were 1.51 (1.43-1.58); and 4.74 (3.02-7.43), 6.27(4.72-8.31), and 1.19(1.03-1.38).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that both diabetes and hypertension are risk factors for the development of CKD, retinopathy, and amputation. Tracing subsequent diabetes for patients with hypertension, and hypertension for patients with diabetes are important in clinical settings.