1. Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With the H-Coil in Parkinsons Disease: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study
- Author
-
Francesca Spagnolo, Mario Fichera, Raffaella Chieffo, Gloria Dalla Costa, Marco Pisa, Maria Antonietta Volonté, Monica Falautano, Abraham Zangen, Giancarlo Comi, Letizia Leocani, Spagnolo, F., Fichera, M., Chieffo, R., Dalla Costa, G., Pisa, M., Volonte, M. A., Falautano, M., Zangen, A., Comi, G., and Leocani, L.
- Subjects
Parkinson's disease ,H-coil = hesed coil ,medicine.medical_treatment ,rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) ,Stimulation ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,lcsh:RC346-429 ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,motor cortex ,Diabetes mellitus ,medicine ,Adverse effect ,lcsh:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system ,030304 developmental biology ,Original Research ,0303 health sciences ,business.industry ,Neuropsychology ,medicine.disease ,Transcranial magnetic stimulation ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,nervous system ,Neurology ,Anesthesia ,movement disorder ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Motor cortex - Abstract
Background: Pilot open-label application of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with H-coil in Parkinson's Disease (PD) have shown promising results.Objective: To evaluate safety and efficacy of high-frequency rTMS with H-coil in PD in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.Methods: Sixty patients with PD were randomized into 3 groups: M1-PFC (real stimulation on primary motor-M1 and pre-frontal cortices-PFC), M1 (real rTMS on M1, sham on PFC), Sham (apparent stimulation). Primary outcome was baseline-normalized percent improvement in UPDRS part III OFF-therapy at the end of treatment (12 rTMS sessions, 4 weeks). Secondary outcomes were improvement in UPDRS part III sub-scores, timed tests, and neuropsychological tests. Statistical analysis compared improvement following real and sham stimulation at the end of the protocol using either a t-test or a Mann-Whitney test.Results: All patients tolerated the treatment and concluded the study. One patient from M1-PFC group was excluded from the analysis due to newly discovered uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. No serious adverse effect was recorded. At the end of treatment, patients receiving real rTMS (M1-PFC and M1 combined) showed significantly greater improvement compared to sham in UPDRS part III total score (p = 0.007), tremor subscore (p = 0.011), and lateralized sub-scores (p = 0.042 for the more affected side; p = 0.012 for the less affected side). No significant differences have been oserved in safety and efficacy outcomes between the two real rTMS groups. Notably, mild, not-distressing and transient dyskinesias occurred in 3 patients after real rTMS in OFF state.Conclusions: The present findings suggest that high-frequency rTMS with H-coil is a safe and potentially effective procedure and prompt larger studies for validation as add-on treatment in PD.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF