Search

The management of an asymptomatic failed renal graft remains controversial. The aim of our study was to explore the effect of failed allograft nephrectomy on kidney retransplantation by comparing the outcome of recipients who underwent graft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation with those who did not. Retrospective comparison of patients undergoing kidney retransplantation with (group A, n = 121) and without (group B, n = 45) preliminary nephrectomy was performed, including subgroup analysis with reference to patients with multiple (≥2) retransplantations and patients of the European Senior Program (ESP). Nephrectomy leads to increased panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels prior to retransplantation and is associated with significantly increased rates of primary nonfunction (PNF; P = 0.05) and acute rejection (P = 0.04). Overall graft survival after retransplantation was significantly worse in group A compared with group B (P = 0.03). Among the subgroups especially ESP patients showed a shorter graft survival after previous allograft nephrectomy. On the multivariate analysis, pretransplant graft nephrectomy and PRA >70% were independent and significant risk factors associated with graft loss after kidney retransplantation. Nephrectomy of the failed allograft was not beneficial for retransplant outcome in our series. Patients with failed graft nephrectomy tended to have a higher risk of PNF and acute rejection after retransplantation. The possibility that the graft nephrectomy has a negative impact on graft function and survival after retransplantation is worth studying further.

Ureteral necrosis after renal transplantation is often the result of impaired perfusion due to loss of donor polar arteries. A way of preserving polar arteries is their anastomosis with the A. epigastrica inferior. In three cases (aged 49-, 58-, and 63 years), 9.3 % of 33 living donors, we detected donor polar arteries on both sides, and anastomosed the polar artery to the A. epigastrica inferior with microsurgical methods. Intraoperatively, the flow was measured by flowmeter, in the postoperative course duplexsonography and MR-angiography was performed. In all three cases we noted a bluish, ischemic parenchym mass of 10-25 % of the kidney and ureter. It recovered immediately, however, after the polar artery had been reconstructed. Intraoperative measurement showed a high flow on the polar- and the main renal artery. Duplexsonography and MR-angiography documented a good flow on the A. epigastrica anastomosis. There have been no signs of ureteral problems at all. After a mean follow-up time of 26 months, the mean creatinine level is 1.46 mg/ml. Ureteral necrosis after kidney transplantation is mostly the result of a lack of perfusion of the polar arteries of the lower kidney pole. If arteriosclerotic lesions inhibit an anastomosis with the renal artery, the anastomosis with the A. epigastrica inferior seems to be a useful alternative.

SummarySimultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice forpatients suffering from type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failuresecondary to diabetic nephropathy. Until 1995, about 90% of pancreas trans-plantations were performed with exocrine drainage into the bladder. Sincethen the proportion of pancreas transplants with enteric drainage increasedsteadily because of frequency of complications and long-term disadvantagesof bladder drainage. However, the use of enteric drainage removes theopportunity to monitor pancreatic allograft function either by measuring uri-nary amylase or by carrying out biopsy via cystoscopy. We report a newtechnique of exocrine pancreatic drainage into the recipient duodenum. Thismodification places the pancreas graft including the duodenal anastomosis ina retroperitoneal location and, importantly, allows easy graft monitoring viagastroscopy. Transplant International ISSN 0934-0874 a 2007 The Authors 178 Journal compilation a 2007 European Society for Organ Transplantation 21 (2008) 178–181

Summary To face the problem of organ shortage, marginal grafts from 36 donors which had been refused for single transplantation were used for double-kidney transplantation (D-KTX). The residual kidney function was evaluated by the Muenster double kidney score. In a 5-year period kidneys from 57 marginal donors were transferred to our center. According to the Muenster double kidney score, the kidneys were distributed to single, double or refusal of transplantation. Sixteen male and 20 female donors were used for D-KTX (70±9.3 years, range 53–86). Thirty-six recipients (23 male, 13 female; 60.5±6.9 years) were double-grafted within a mean cold ischemic time of 19.3±3.4 h. Immunosuppression varied according to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatch. Graft and patient survival was observed up to 5 years. Initial graft function rate was 69%. Two recipients had a primary nonfunction (5.5%) and nine recipients suffered from delayed graft function (DGF; 25%). One-, 2-, 3-year creatinine values were 1.6 ± 0.5, 1.9 ± 0.6 and 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/dl, respectively. One-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year function rate was 93.7%, 93.5%, 81.8%, 76.4% and 55%, respectively (n = 32, 31, 22, 17 and 9). Acute rejection rate was 19%. 4 grafts were lost to chronic rejection (months 22, 25, 28, 48). Six (16%) died in long-term follow-up because of pneumonia (n = 2), carcinoma of the lung (n = 1), cardial complications (n = 2) and multiorgan failure (n = 1). D-KTX is a safe way to face the problem of organ shortage. However, a score for preoperative evaluation of marginal kidneys for single, dual or refusal of transplantation is essential.