Search

Introduction: Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) may aggravate critical illness. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition has beneficial effects in ventilator-induced lung injury, its clinical application is impeded by concomitant hypotension. We hypothesized that the aminopeptidase inhibitor ALT-00 may oppose the hypotension induced by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and that this combination would activate the alternative renin-angiotensin system (RAS) axis to counteract ventilator-induced lung injury.Methods: In separate experiments, C57BL/6 mice were mechanically ventilated with low (LVT, 6 mL/kg) and high tidal volumes (HVT, 30 mL/kg) for 4 h or remained unventilated (sham). High tidal volume-ventilated mice were treated with lisinopril (0.15 μg/kg/min) ± ALT-00 at 2.7, 10 or 100 μg/kg/min. Blood pressure was recorded at baseline and after 4 h. Lung histology was evaluated for ventilator-induced lung injury and the angiotensin (Ang) metabolite profile in plasma (equilibrium levels of Ang I, Ang II, Ang III, Ang IV, Ang 1-7, and Ang 1-5) was measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry at the end of the experiment. Angiotensin concentration-based markers for renin, angiotensin-converting enzyme and alternative renin-angiotensin system activities were calculated.Results: High tidal volume-ventilated mice treated with lisinopril showed a significant drop in the mean arterial pressure at 4 h compared to baseline, which was prevented by adding ALT-00 at 10 and 100 μg/kg/min. Ang I, Ang II and Ang 1-7 plasma equilibrium levels were elevated in the high tidal volumes group versus the sham group. Lisinopril reduced Ang II and slightly increased Ang I and Ang 1-7 levels versus the untreated high tidal volumes group. Adding ALT-00 at 10 and 100 μg/kg/min increased Ang I and Ang 1-7 levels versus the high tidal volume group, and partly prevented the downregulation of Ang II levels caused by lisinopril. The histological lung injury score was higher in the high tidal volume group versus the sham and low tidal volume groups, and was attenuated by lisinopril ± ALT-00 at all dose levels.Conclusion: Combined angiotensin-converting enzyme plus aminopeptidase inhibition prevented systemic hypotension and maintained the protective effect of lisinopril. In this study, a combination of lisinopril and ALT-00 at 10 μg/kg/min appeared to be the optimal approach, which may represent a promising strategy to counteract ventilator-induced lung injury that merits further exploration.

According to the Berlin Definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of at least 5 cmH2O is required to diagnose and grade ARDS. While the Berlin consensus statement specifically acknowledges the role of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in mild ARDS, this stratification has traditionally presumed a mechanically ventilated patient in the context of moderate to severe ARDS. This may not accurately reflect today’s reality of clinical respiratory care. NIV and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNO) have been used for managing of severe forms of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with growing frequency, including in patients showing pathophysiological signs of ARDS. This became especially relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic. The levels of PEEP achieved with HFNO have been particularly controversial, and the exact FiO2 it achieves is subject to variability. Pinpointing the presence of ARDS in patients receiving HNFO and the severity in those receiving NIV therefore remains methodically problematic. This narrative review highlights the evolution of the ARDS definition in the context of non-invasive ventilatory support and provides an overview of the parallel development of definitions and ventilatory management of ARDS. It summarizes the methodology applied in clinical trials to classify ARDS in non-intubated patients and the respective consequences on treatment. As ARDS severity has significant therapeutic and prognostic consequences, and earlier treatment in non-intubated patients may be beneficial, closing this knowledge gap may ultimately be a relevant step to improve comparability in clinical trial design and outcomes.