Search

BackgroundWe aimed to determine vaccine hesitancy and the main barriers associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccination among families of children diagnosed with food/drug/environmental allergies.MethodsBetween May and June 2021, we approached 146 families seen at the outpatient allergy clinic at the Montreal Children's Hospital and a community allergy practice were invited to complete an anonymous online survey on COVID-19 and vaccination attitudes and behaviour. Uni and multivariable logistic regressions were compared to estimate factors associated with vaccine hesitancy.ResultsAmong all patients, 24.1% reported vaccine hesitancy. The large majority of parents (95.2%) believed that vaccines work. The most common barrier to vaccination was fear of adverse side effects (57.0%). One-third of participants (31.5%) reported that a history of food, venom and drug allergy was a contraindication for COVID-19 vaccination. Fifty-nine (60.8%) participants stated that the dissemination of additional information would increase their willingness to be vaccinated. Most (96.9%) parents reported that their children's vaccinations were up to date. Hesitant families were more likely to be parents of children aged 6–10 years, be of Asian descent, report that mRNA vaccines are riskier than traditional vaccines, and report that the vaccine should not be given if the child has a history of allergic reaction to vaccines.ConclusionVaccine hesitancy exists mainly among certain ethnic groups and families with young children. Allergies to food, venom and drug allergy are commonly perceived as contraindications for COVID-19 vaccination. Knowledge translation activities addressing parental concerns will help increase vaccination rates.

Delayed drug T-cell immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions have a large clinical heterogeneity varying from mild maculopapular exanthema (MPE) to severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and severe skin necrosis and blistering as seen in Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Given the knowledge gaps related to the immunopathogenesis of these conditions, the absence of validated diagnostic tools and the significant associated morbidity and mortality, patients with SCARs often have limited drug choices. We performed a comprehensive review aiming to evaluate in vivo diagnostic tools such as delayed intradermal skin and patch testing and ex vivo/in vitro research assays such as the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and the enzyme-linked ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay. We searched through PubMed using the terms “drug allergy,” “in vivo” and “ex vivo” for original papers in the last 10 years. A detailed meticulous approach adapted to the various clinical phenotypes is recommended for the diagnostic and management of delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. This review highlights the current diagnostic tools for the delayed drug hypersensitivity phenotypes.

SPT is the most commonly used confirmatory test for an IgE-mediated milk allergy. However, food SPTs are not standardized. We aimed to assess the accuracy of SPTs with extract, diluted, and undiluted milk to detect desensitization in children with milk allergy undergoing OIT. Children with milk allergy undergoing OIT and controls were recruited from Montreal Children’s Hospital (MCH), British Columbia Children’s Hospital (BCCH) and The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids). Participants in the active arm received a weekly increase in milk until 200 ml of pure milk was tolerated. SPT using milk extract (Omega), diluted 2% milk (1:10), and undiluted milk was done at the study entry and when 200 ml of pure milk was reached. Participants in the control arm had SPT at study entry and 12 months later before they entered the active arm. Among 53 children who reached 200 ml, the median age was 12 years and 54.7% were males. The mean decrease in wheal size at 200 ml from the baseline was 3.78 mm (95%CI, 2.55–5.01), 5.05 mm (95% CI, 3.68–6.41), and 5.05 mm (95% CI, 3.29–6.80) for milk extract, diluted and undiluted milk respectively. Among 32 controls, the median age was 10 years and 62.5% were males. There was no significant change in wheal diameter over a one-year period regardless of the skin test method. Response to extract behaved similarly to whole food (Diluted and undiluted) and thus can be used to follow sensitization in the context of a desensitization program.

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2109 (COVID-19) vaccines have recently been approved to curb the global pandemic. The risk of allergic reactions to the vaccine polyethylene glycol (PEG) component has raised significant public concern. Desensitization is suggested in cases of vaccine related hypersensitivity reactions. After comprehensive literature review on the topic, our aim was to establish a safe and effective desensitization protocol for patients with suspected or confirmed immediate type hypersensitivity reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine.MethodsParticipants were referred to the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) Allergy-Immunology department for clinical evaluation following a reported reaction to their first dose of Moderna® mRNA-1273 or Pfizer-BioNTech® BNT162b2 vaccines. They underwent skin prick testing (SPT) with higher and lower molecular weight (MW) PEG and polysorbate 80, as per published protocols. Their second dose was administered following a desensitization protocol consisting of multiple dose-administration steps followed by a 60-min observation period.ResultsAmong a cohort of 142 patients with an increased risk for allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines, six individuals were selected to undergo desensitization. All were female with allergic background including chronic spontaneous urticaria, anaphylaxis to medications, and/or vaccines. The main symptom after their first dose was difficulty swallowing with lightheadedness or immediate urticaria, angioedema, and/or dizziness. Two patients had positive skin testing. One patient was on chronic antihistamines which resulted in an inconclusive PEG skin test and the skin testing was negative for the three other patients. During the desensitization, two patients reported cutaneous symptoms of an immediate reaction and were managed with antihistamines. One of these patients also complained of ear pressure and had a drop in her systolic blood pressure, treated with intravenous fluids.ConclusionThis study suggests that some individuals with an immediate-type hypersensitivity reaction to their first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine may safely receive their second dose using a desensitization protocol. The success of this desensitization protocol is a step forward in the fight against COVID-19, allowing more individuals to be immunized.

BackgroundOral immunotherapy (OIT) is an emerging treatment for cow’s milk protein (CMP) allergy in children. The mechanisms driving tolerance following OIT are not well understood. Regulatory T cells (TREG) cells are key inhibitors of allergic responses and promoters of allergen-specific tolerance. In an exploratory study, we sought to detect induction of allergen-specific TREG in a cohort of subjects undergoing OIT.MethodsPediatric patients with a history of allergic reaction to cow’s milk and a positive Skin Pick Test (SPT) and/or CMP-specific IgE >0.35 kU, as well as a positive oral challenge to CMP underwent OIT with escalating doses of milk and were followed for up to 6 months. At specific milestones during the dose escalation and maintenance phases, casein-specific CD4+ T cells were expanded from patient blood by culturing unfractionated PBMCs with casein in vitro. The CD4+ T cell phenotypes were quantified by flow cytometry.ResultsOur culture system induced activated casein-specific FOXP3+Helios+ TREG cells and FOXP3- TEFF cells, discriminated by expression of CD137 (4-1BB) and CD154 (CD40L) respectively. The frequency of casein-specific TREG cells increased significantly with escalating doses of milk during OIT while casein-specific TEFF cell frequencies remained constant. Moreover, expanded casein-specific TREG cells expressed higher levels of FOXP3 compared to polyclonal TREG cells, suggesting a more robust TREG phenotype. The induction of casein-specific TREG cells increased with successful CMP desensitization and correlated with increased frequencies of casein-specific Th1 cells among OIT subjects. The level of casein-specific TREG cells negatively correlated with the time required to reach the maintenance phase of desensitization.ConclusionsOverall, effective CMP-OIT successfully promoted the expansion of casein-specific, functionally-stable FOXP3+ TREG cells while mitigating Th2 responses in children receiving OIT. Our exploratory study proposes that an in vitro TREG response to casein may correlate with the time to reach maintenance in CMP-OIT.