Search

Introduction: Pacemaker therapy is effective in reducing recurrent syncope in patients with symptomatic carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH), yet the optimal pacing modality for this syndrome is not known. The objective of this study is to prospectively investigate the impact of three pacing methods (DDDR vs DDDR with sudden bradycardia response [SBR] vs VVI) on recurrent syncope and quality of life., Methods: Twenty-one patients with symptomatic CSH (syncope or near syncope) were randomized to VVI, DDDR, or DDDR with SBR on a double-blinded basis in a sequential crossover fashion with 6 months in each mode. The primary endpoints were recurrent events and quality of life (assessed by SF-36). The mean number of events and SF-36 scores were compared., Results: At baseline, over the preceding 6 months, there were a total of 29 syncopal events and 258 presyncopal events among 21 patients. Following pacing in any mode, the total number of these syncopal events reduced to two in two patients (P < 0.001) and 17 presyncopal events (P < 0.001) in 12 patients. The mean number of events was not significantly different between the three pacing methods. SF-36 scores revealed some minor benefits of DDDR pacing versus baseline in the categories, but no pacing method was found to be superior., Conclusions: The study was unable to confirm the initial study hypothesis of a superiority of one pacing modality over another. Quality of life measures allude to potential benefit from DDDR pacing alone., (©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Automatic detection of capture in ICDs would be useful for ensuring normal pacing function and lead integrity and may increase device longevity. Evoked response detection can be difficult due to postpace polarization. Polarization on the RV coil to can vector, however, should be absent when pacing with a true bipolar lead (pace tip to ring). Polarization on the RV coil to can vector should be low in an integrated bipolar lead due to the large surface area of the coil. Ventricular-paced responses were prospectively recorded in 20 patients during ICD implantation or replacement. Capture and loss of capture responses were noted during threshold searches with electrograms recorded between the RV coil and can. A detector was designed to discriminate between capture and noncapture-paced responses using data from the first 11 patients and validated on the remaining 9. The detector had a sensitivity of 99.9% (detected capture on capture beats), and had a specificity of 100% (detected no capture on noncapture beats) for all lead configurations. There was no measurable polarization with true bipolar leads. In integrated bipolar leads, maximum polarization ranged from 0.0 to 16.7 mV. In conclusion, paced evoked responses can be detected in ICDs using the RV coil to can vector using standard pacing waveforms. Special polarization reducing pacing waveforms are not required. These observations could be used to design ICDs with automatic pacing threshold detection.

Subcutaneous leads (SQ) add complexity to the defibrillation system and the implant procedure. New low output devices might increase the requirement for SQ arrays, although this might be offset by the effects of active can and biphasic technology. This study sought to assess the impact of these technologies on SQ lead usage, and to determine if clinical variables could predict the need for an SQ lead. Patients receiving nonthoracotomy systems (n = 554) at our institution underwent step-down-to-failure DFT testing with implant criteria of a 10-J safety margin. SQ leads were used only after several endovascular configurations failed. Use of biphasic waveforms significantly lowered the frequency of use of SQ leads from 48% to 3.7% (P < 0.000001). SQ leads were required in 4.4% of patients with cold can devices and 2.6% of patients with active can devices (P = NS). There was no increase in SQ lead usage with low energy (< 30-J delivered energy) devices. Clinical variables (including EF, heart disease, arrhythmia, and prior bypass) did not predict the need for an SQ lead. The implant DFT using SQ arrays (14.5 +/- 6.5 J) was not significantly lower than that for SQ patches (16.6 + 6.0 J). We conclude that biphasic waveforms significantly reduce the need for SQ leads. Despite this reduction, 3.7% of implants still use an SQ lead to achieve adequate safety margins. The introduction of lower output devices has not increased the need for SQ leads, and when an SQ lead is required, there is not a significant difference in the implant DFT of patches versus arrays. Clinical variables cannot predict which patients require SQ leads.

Numerous types of interactions between pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been described. Pacemaker outputs preventing appropriate detection of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation by the ICD is one of the more serious. Asynchronous pacemaker activity during ventricular arrhythmias may be caused by either nonsensing of the arrhythmia or by noise reversion, which is an algorithm that causes the pacemaker to switch to asynchronous pacing when repetitive sensing at a high rate occurs. We analyzed the mechanisms underlying asynchronous pacemaker activity in ventricular arrhythmias using pacemaker telemetry during the arrhythmia. Thirty-nine induced arrhythmias from 26 different procedures in 19 patients with both pacemakers and ICDs were analyzed. Of the 39 arrhythmias, asynchronous pacemaker activity occurred in 16. The underlying mechanism was nonsensing in 4 episodes and noise reversion in 12 episodes. Clinically significant interference with detection arose on three occasions. Conditions favoring the occurrence of noise reversion include specific pacemaker models, arrhythmia cycle lengths in the range causing noise reversion of the individual pacemaker model, long noise sampling periods, and VVI pacing mode. Noise reversion can be diagnosed by telemetering the pacemaker marker channel during ventricular arrhythmias as a part of routine pacemaker-ICD interaction evaluation. It can be prevented or minimized by programming short ventricular refractory periods or using pacemakers with short retriggerable refractory periods.

Successful long-term cardiac pacemaker therapy requires both reliable generator output and stable, attainable chronic stimulation thresholds. Strength duration curves, which display cardiac stimulation thresholds as a function of impulse duration, provide needed data to evaluate more thoroughly acute and chronic lead thresholds. We measured chronic strength duration curves at the time of generator replacement in 47 patients with three different types of lead systems of variable geometry and surface area and compared these curves with acute strength duration curves measured at the time of initial implantation in 19 patients. We found that strength duration curves has a characteristic shape; however, chronic strength duration curves were shifted upward and to the right of acute strength duration curves, regardless of electrode tip surface area or geometric design. Our data suggest that variable pulse width exceeding 1 ms may not significantly reduce stimulation thresholds.