Search

Aim: Family health centers (FHCs) are reimbursed for their current expenditures based on a classification of four clusters in Turkey. This study compared the coordination, comprehensiveness, continuity, accessibility, and the first contact of care among different reimbursement FHC groups. Methods: The data were obtained from the Turkish data of the Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe study. Data was collected in provinces from six geographical regions. Physicians and patients from Classes A and B FHCs were called the first group, and others were called the second group. Results: A total of 296 physicians and 2623 patients were enrolled. According to the reimbursement groups, 593 (22.6%) patients received services from the first group and 2012 (77.4%) patients from the second group. The first contact with care and the admission frequency of 3 or more in the last six months were higher in the first group (respectively, 99.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.027; 55.4% vs. 49.6%, p=0.015). Conclusion: The reimbursement classification did not make a difference in coordination, comprehensive care, continuity, accessibility, and being the first contact of care. Therefore, the current classification does not contribute to improving the quality of primary care in terms of service provision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinical and laboratory outcome of cryptozoospermia cases compared to the extremely severe oligospermia cases in a single IVF center. Materials and Methods: All the IVF laboratory and clinical outcomes of cryptozoospermia and extremely severe oligospermia cases were analyzed and compared between January 2014 and December 2019 in Istanbul Florence Nightingale IVF Center. The same reproductive group treated all couples. Virtual azoospermia or cryptozoospermia were diagnosed once the mature sperm cells could be recognized after centrifugation (group 1). Patients without motile sperm were excluded. Extremely severe oligospermia was defined as a sperm count was less than <1 mil/mL (group 2). The study consisted of 33 virtual azoospermic patients with 40 cycles, whereas there were 40 severely oligospermic patients with 45 cycles. All patients underwent the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedure and all the embryos were let to grow until the blastocyst stage on day 5. Groups were compared for clinical and laboratory reproductive outcome. Results: Both the median maternal and paternal ages were similar. All outcomes including fertilization rates, blastulation rates, clinical pregnancy and delivery rates were comparable. The miscarriage rates did not also show any statistical difference. Conclusion: Reproductive outcomes in cryptozoospermic IVF patients are comparable to those of extremely severe oligospermic patients provided that the ICSI is performed using motile spermatozoa. Our results favor using sperm from fresh ejaculate rather than surgical sperm retrieval when motile sperm is available in cryptozoospermic IVF patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]