Search

Purpose The superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) Resovist is a contrast media with shortening of both T(1) and T(2) relaxation time. This study evaluates the impact of SPIO-enhanced T(1)- and T(2)-weighted images for the differentiation of liver lesions. Materials and methods SPIO-enhanced MRI examinations (1.5 T, Symphony Quantum) of 61 patients were analyzed. Thirty-seven patients had malignant liver lesions (metastases n = 32, HCC n = 5) proven by biopsy or laparotomy, 11 patients had benign liver lesions (FNH n = 2, hemangiomas n = 4, benign cysts n = 5, normal liver on laparoscopy n = 13). After unenhanced T(1)- and T (2)-weighted imaging, a bolus injection of 1.4 ml SPIO (Resovist) was given, followed by T(1)-weighted imaging at 20 s, 60 s, and 5 min and T(2)-weighted imaging at 10 min post injection. A score from 1 (benign) to 5 (malignant) was used by three blinded radiologist for the ROC analysis of the unenhanced T(1)-/T(2)-weighted images (set 1) and of the combinations of unenhanced T(1)/T(2)-weighted and SPIO T(1)-weighted images (set 2), unenhanced T(1)/T(2) and SPIO T(2)-w images (set 3) and all images (set 4). Results The accuracy of plain MRI (set 1: 56 %) was increased by SPIO-enhanced T(1)-weighted images (set 2: 81 %) and SPIO-enhanced T(2)-weighted images (set 3: 90 %). Best results were obtained using unenhanced T(1)-weighted, unenhanced T(2)-weighted and both SPIO T(1)-weighted and T(2)-weighted images (set 4: 93%). The accuracy of predicting histopathologic diagnosis was 91%. Conclusion For the differentiation of liver lesions, SPIO-enhanced T(2)-weighted images had a greater impact on the accuracy of MRI than T (1)-weighted images, but SPIO-enhanced T(1)-weighted images provided additional information in some patients and should not be deleted.

AIM Evaluation of sonography in the placement of catheters for laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) as well as for the observation of the therapeutic procedure in cases of malignant liver tumours. METHODS Following the placement of 1-4 LITT applicators, 18 patients with malignant liver tumours (recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma n = 5, metachronous liver metastases n = 13) were examined by ultrasound to determine the position of the applicators as well as the sonographic visualisation of the respective lesion. The laser treatment procedure was also observed sonographically. As standard reference method for the documentation of thermally induced necroses we used magnetic resonance tomography 24-48 hours after the procedure. RESULTS The tip of the applicator could be localised in all cases, and the position of the applicator relative to the lesion could be directly visualised in 78% of cases. The hyperechogenic thermal effect during LITT had a median size of 4.5 cm, thus proving to be significantly larger than the actual necrosis induced (p < 0.01). The sonographic observation of the procedure identified 8/10 primarily incomplete ablations which were then treated again immediately after correction of the position of the applicators. CONCLUSION Continuous sonographic observation of the procedure of LITT can yield important additional information.