Search

Introduction: Papillary squamotransitional cell carcinoma (PSTCC) arising from the uterine cervix is a distinctive histomorphological subtype of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) not otherwise specified (NOS) of cervical epithelial tumors., Aim: The present study was undertaken to study the histopathological features and immunoexpression of CK7, CK20, p53 and Ki-67 in PSTCC of the cervix., Materials and Methods: This study included 43 cases of PSTCC of cervix. A technique of manual tissue array was employed along with IHC staining of entire section in some cases. The expression pattern of CK7, CK 20, p53 and Ki67 in PSTCC was studied and clinico-pathological correlation of various parameters with IHC expression of CK7 and CK20 was observed. Results were subjected to statistical analysis and were considered significant when the p-value was less than 0.05., Results: Out of 43 PSTCC cases, there were 38 squamotransitional type and 5 papillary type. Histomorphologically, all the cases studied were having fused papillae with rounded contours and fibrovascular cores with highest number of cases having intermediate cell type morphology (86%). Stromal invasion was seen in 74.4% of cases. Koilocytosis were seen in 39.3% of cases. Thirty-two cases showed CK7 immunopositivity (+) and CK20 immunonegativity (-), nine cases were both CK7 and CK20 - and two cases were CK7- and CK20+. Among them 90.7% cases were p53 positive and all cases were positive for Ki67 immunostaining with highest number of cases showing moderate proliferative activity (74.4%); followed by nine cases showing high (20.93%) and two cases showing low proliferative activity (4.65%)., Conclusion: The distinct histomorphology and CK7/CK20 immnunoprofile of PSTCC along with Ki67 and p53 could help in arriving at an accurate diagnosis as well predicting its biological behavior.

Background: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II and CIN III have a high progression rate to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Histopathological assessment is known to have intra and inter-observer diagnostic discrepancies even among two panels of pathologist. Subsequently, to improve on the accuracy of histopathological examination, various IHC biomarkers have been evaluated in the biopsy of cervix., Aim: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the immunoexpression and interrelationship of p16INK4A, MIB-1 and CK17 in histopathologically diagnosed cases of CIN and invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC) which could aid in differentiating CIN and ICC from benign cervical lesions., Materials and Methods: This study included 120 cases of cervical lesions; out of which 20 cases were each of negative for malignancy/dysplasia (NED), CIN I and CIN III, 10 cases of CIN II and 50 cases of ICC. A technique of manual tissue microarray was employed for the study of immunohistochemical markers such as p16INK4A, CK17 and MIB-1 in all cases. Results were subjected to statistical analysis., Results: The difference in p16 immunoexpression between NED (0/20, 0%) and CIN+ICC (97/100, 97%) cases was statistically highly significant. (p<0.01) The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of p16 immunoexpression in comparison to histopathological diagnosis was 97%, 100%, 100%, 86.96% and 97.5% respectively. The overall agreement of p16 staining with histopathological diagnosis was 97.5% (?=0.9151 i.e. very good) The difference in MIB-1 immunoexpression between CIN-I (6/20, 30%) and CIN II+III (30/30, 100%), CIN (36/50,72%) and ICC (50/50, 100%) cases was statistically highly significant. (p<0.01) The difference in MIB-1 immunoexpression between NED (0/20, 0%) and CIN+IC (86/100, 86%) cases was statistically highly significant. (p<0.01) The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of MIB-1 immunoexpression in comparison to histopathological diagnosis was 86%, 100%, 100%, 58.82% and 88.33% respectively. The overall agreement of MIB-1 staining with H&E diagnosis was 88.33%. (?=0.6719 i.e. good) The difference in CK17 immunoexpression between CIN-I (11/20, 55%) and CIN-II+III (26/30, 86.67%) cases was statistically significant. (p=0.030) The difference in CK17 immunoexpression between CIN (37/50, 74%) and ICC (46/50, 92%) cases was statistically significant. (p=0.033) The difference in CK17 immunoexpression between NED (0/20, 0%) and CIN+ICC (83/100, 83%) cases was statistically highly significant. (p<0.01) The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of CK 17 immunoexpression in comparison to histopathological diagnosis was 82%, 100%, 100%, 52.63% and 85% respectively. The overall agreement of CK 17 staining with histopathological diagnosis was 85% (?=0.6029 i.e. moderate) The agreement between p16 and MIB-1 immunostaining was 89.16%. (?= 0.7 i.e., good) The agreement between CK17 and MIB-1 immunostaining was 86.6%. (?= 0.683 i.e., good) The agreement between p16 and CK17 immunostaining was 84.16%. (?= 0.5908 i.e., moderate) Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate that the IHC report of p16, MIB-1 and CK-17 in CIN and ICC cases if included in each histopathology report could aid in accurate diagnosis which could facilitate in better patient management.