Search

The performance of an X-bar chart is usually studied under the assumption that the process standard deviation is well estimated and does not change. This is, of course, not always the case in practice. We find that X-bar charts are not robust against errors in estimating the process standard deviation or changing standard deviation. In this paper we discuss the use of a t chart and an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) t chart to monitor the process mean. We determine the optimal control limits for the EWMA t chart and show that this chart has the desired robustness property. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

When monitoring the process variability, it is a common practice that a Phase I data set is used to estimate the unknown in-control process standard deviation σ0 or variance [Formula: see text] to set up the control limits, then monitoring proceeds. Once the process is considered to be in-control, the estimated control limits are assumed as fixed. This practice ignores the effect of estimating the unknown in-control process variance [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we derive the exact run length distribution of the S2 control chart when the in-control process variance [Formula: see text] is estimated and find that m = 200 or more Phase I samples are needed to neglect the effect of using estimated control limits. New control limits when m is small are also derived.