Search

International audience; Purpose: Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic compelled urologists to change access to healthcare, especially for oncology patients. Teleconsultation is a safe way to receive medical advice without a risk of infection, and was implemented urgently in our academic centres. Our purpose was to evaluate patient and physician satisfaction with teleconsultation set up during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: From March 16th 2020, all face-to-face consultations were cancelled in France, except for emergencies. Teleconsultation was started immediately by five senior urologists in two academic hospitals. All patients received an email survey including the validated Teleconsultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) and demographic questions. Data were collected prospectively. Physicians also responded to the TSQ. Patient satisfaction was measured objectively with the validated 14-item TSQ. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Factors associated with positive satisfaction with teleconsultation were assessed by multivariable logistic regression.Results: Overall, 105 patients replied to the survey (91.3%). Median age was 66 years (IQR: 55‒71) and 95 were men (90.5%). Median overall TSQ score was 67 (IQR: 60‒69); teleconsultation was judged to be a good experience by 88 patients (83.8%) and four physicians (80%). Patients who met their surgeon for the first time were more likely to have a good experience (OR = 1.2 [95% CI 1.1‒1.5], p = 0.03).Conclusion: Introduced rapidly during the COVID-19 lockdown, urology teleconsultation attained a high level of satisfaction among both patients and physicians. A major change in telemedicine use is foreseen in the post COVID-19 era.

International audience; Introduction: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, all non-emergency surgical activity has been cancelled since March 12, 2020. In order to anticipate the reinstatement of delayed interventions, surgical activity reduction analysis is essential. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reduction of urological surgery in adult during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2019.Material: The data regarding urological procedures realized in the 8 academic urological departments of Parisians centres (AP-HP) were compared over two similar periods (14-29 March 2019 and 12-27 March 2020) using the centralized surgical planning software shared by these centres. Procedure title, type of surgery and outpatient ratio were collected. The interventions were sorted into 16 major families of urological interventions.Results: Overall, a 55% decrease was observed concerning urological procedures over the same period between 2019 and 2020 (995 and 444 procedures respectively). Oncology activity and emergencies decreased by 31% and 44%. The number of kidney transplantations decreased from 39 to 3 (-92%). Functional, andrological and genital surgical procedures were the most impacted among the non-oncological procedures (-85%, -81% and -71%, respectively). Approximatively, 1033 hours of surgery have been delayed during this 16-day period.Conclusion: Lockdown and postponement of non-urgent scheduled urological procedures decisions has led to a drastic decrease in surgical activity in AP-HP. Isolated kidney transplantation has been stopped (national statement). Urologists must anticipate for lockdown exit in order to catch-up delayed surgeries.Level of evidence: 3.; IntroductionEn conséquence de la pandémie de COVID-19 en France, toute activité chirurgicale non urgente a dû être annulée à partir du 12 mars 2020. Afin d’anticiper la reprise des interventions décalées, une quantification de la réduction d’activité est nécessaire. L’objectif de l’étude était d’évaluer comparativement à 2019 la réduction d’activité chirurgicale urologique adulte pendant la pandémie de COVID-19.Matériel et méthodesNous avons comparé le nombre d’interventions urologiques pratiquées dans les 8 services universitaires d’urologie de l’Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (AP–HP) sur deux périodes comparables (14–29 mars 2019 et 12–27 mars 2020) à l’aide du logiciel de planification opératoire et du PMSI partagé par ces centres. L’intitulé d’intervention et le type de chirurgie ont été collectés et regroupées en 16 catégories.RésultatsUne baisse de l’activité globale à l’AP–HP en urologie de 55 % entre 2019 et 2020 (995 et 444 interventions respectivement) a été constatée sur les 8 services. L’activité oncologique et les urgences ont diminué de 31 % et 44 %. L’activité de transplantation rénale, la chirurgie fonctionnelle et andrologique ont subi les plus fortes baisses d’activité par les interventions non oncologiques (−92 %, −85 % et −81 %, respectivement). Environ 1033 heures d’intervention devront être reprogrammées pour rattraper le programme opératoire annulé.ConclusionLe confinement et le report des interventions chirurgicales « non urgentes » ont entraîné une diminution drastique de l’activité chirurgicale au sein de l’AP–HP. Pendant cette période, les urologues ont été sollicités pour d’autres tâches mais doivent désormais s’atteler à organiser la période de reprise d’activité pour éviter une crise organisationnelle en urologique.Niveau de preuve3.

Resume Introduction La pose d’implants intra-prostatiques Urolift est une technique mini-invasive, qui se place comme alternative aux techniques chirurgicales classique de l’hyperplasie benigne de la prostate. Notre objectif etait de rapporter les resultats de la pose d’implants Urolift® apres 7 ans d’experience. Patients et methode L’intervention a ete proposee entre fevrier 2012 et mars 2019 aux patients consultant dans notre centre pour hyperplasie benigne de la prostate (HBP) symptomatique, en alternative a un traitement chirurgical classique. L’efficacite etait evaluee par auto-questionnaire sur la symptomatologie urinaire (IPSS) et sur son retentissement (IPSS-QdV). La tolerance etait evaluee par questionnaires sur la fonction erectile (IIEF5) et ejaculatoire (MSHQ-EjD) et le taux de complications. La survie sans traitement additionnel a ete evaluee. Resultats Quarante patients ont ete traites pendant cette periode, avec un suivi moyen de 32 mois [12—67]. Trois mois apres l’intervention, l’IPSS et l’IPSS-QdV etaient significativement ameliores (respectivement 8 [4–11] vs 20 [17–24] ; p 2 n’a ete rapportee. La survie sans traitement additionnel a 5 ans etait de 50 %. Conclusions La pose d’implants intra-prostatiques Urolift® a permis une amelioration significative des symptomes dans notre population, avec une bonne tolerance. Environ deux tiers des patients n’avaient pas recu de traitement additionnel en fin d’experience. Le risque de reintervention etait maximal au cours des dix-huit premiers mois. Niveau de preuve 3.

Calcium stones and calculi are observed in numerous human tissues. They are the result of deposition of calcium salts and are due to high local calcium concentrations. Prostatic calculi are usually classified as endogenous or extrinsic stones. Endogenous stones are commonly caused by obstruction of the prostatic ducts around an enlarged prostate resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia or from chronic inflammation. The latter occurs mainly around the urethra and is generally caused by reflux of urine into the prostate. Calcium concentrations higher than in the plasma at sites of infection may induce the chemotactic response that eventually leads to recruitment of inflammatory cells. The calcium sensing receptor (CaSR) may be crucial for this recruitment as its expression and activity are increased by cytokines such as IL-6 and high extracellular calcium concentrations, respectively. The links between calcium calculi, inflammation, calcium supplementation, and CaSR functions in prostate cancer patients will be discussed in this review.