Search

This study is to investigate the clinical utility of detection of peripheral blood triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM)-1 mRNA as an early indicator of sepsis among critically ill patients and to compare the results of TREM-1 with those of C-reactive protein (CRP). A prospective, non-interventional study of 127 patients with at least two criteria of the systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) was performed. TREM-1 was assessed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The diagnosis of SIRS only was made in 41 patients (32%), and the diagnosis of sepsis was made in other 86 patients (68%). TREM-1 mRNA expression had the comparably discriminative value to differentiate the presence from the absence of infection, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.75 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.67-0.84] than CRP [AUC, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.81)]. As an indicator of sepsis, a TREM-1 mRNA expression ratio cutoff value of 58.8 had a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 71%, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.5 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.39. Furthermore, TREM-1 mRNA expression was selectively higher in septic patients caused by extracellular bacteria or fungi [112.4 (19.3-680.1)], than in those caused by intracellular bacteria or viruses [18.8 (7.6-53.0), p < 0.001]. There was no difference in plasma CRP levels between both septic groups (p = 0.782). TREM-1 and CRP are similar diagnostic markers of sepsis. The different ability of extracellular and intracellular pathogens to induce TREM-1 expression may provide a potential marker for differential diagnosis.

A press through package (PTP) is commonly used as a package for drugs and also being seen increasingly in cases of foreign body in the digestive tract. We presented three cases of inadvertent PTP ingestion with a variety of clinical presentations. Although commonly considered to be small and soft to cause bowel damage, a PTP tends to be caught and poses potential risk for perforation of the bowel because of its sharp edges. The PTP material is thought to be difficult to detect on plain abdominal roentgenography due to its radiolucency. However, air trapped in the PTP makes the drug tablet possibly visible on the radiograph. All of the three cases were diagnosed with correct interpretation of these special radiographic findings, even without the recall of accidental swallowing of the tablet. A PTP in the oesophagus and stomach should be tried to be removed, while computerised tomography and early laparotomy should be considered when it passes through the pyloric ring and the patient develops symptoms. An effort to prevent the PTP swallowing should be an essential part in our everyday practice, especially for the elderly patients.