Search

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is an infrequent entity of unknown aetiology. Currently, there is no clear consensus on the treatment, and nothing has shown definitive safety and efficacy. We describe the case of a woman diagnosed with pulmonary RDD, who responded to thalidomide treatment after failure of four previous lines of systemic chemotherapy. CASE DESCRIPTION We present the case of a 74-year-old woman diagnosed with pulmonary RDD and autoimmune complications. We decided to use thalidomide as a rescue treatment after the failure of corticosteroids and several chemotherapies. Our patient achieved remission of the disease and remained stable for years. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case in which thalidomide treatment induced remission in refractory pulmonary RDD. Thalidomide showed a rapid onset of action, with lasting responses, which could make it an exciting option for treating this life-threatening.

What is known and objective No studies have evaluated the use of sorafenib with the direct-acting antiviral ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r+DSV). Case summary Three hepatitis C virus genotype 1b-infected patients with well-preserved liver function were included in this prospective case series. The patients were taking sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and received OBV/PTV/r+DSV for 12 weeks. One patient discontinued sorafenib while concomitant treatment due to grade 2 fatigue and muscular pain. The other two patients reported only grade 1 adverse effects. Sustained virologic response at 24 weeks was achieved, and no tumour recurrences were found. What is new and conclusion The concurrent use of OBV/PTV/r+DSV with sorafenib was considered safe and effective.

SummaryWhat is known and objective Limited data are available on eosinophilia as a drug adverse event. We describe a case of eosinophilia from lenalidomide therapy. Case description A 50-year-old woman received lenalidomide, dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide as POEMS syndrome treatment. Eosinophil count rose during lenalidomide treatment and decreased in the periods off treatment. Naranjo nomogram suggested a probable association between the use of lenalidomide and eosinophilia. What is new and conclusion Eosinophilia has rarely been described with lenalidomide. This case shows a clear temporal relationship between lenalidomide and eosinophilia.

SummaryWhat is known and objective Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by accelerated platelet destruction, as well as suboptimal platelet production. Thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists bind to and activate human TPO receptor, and have been shown to increase platelet counts. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of long-term administration of TPO agonist romiplostim in adult and paediatric patients. Methods This is a retrospective observational study that included every ITP patient (adults and children) who received romiplostim since its inclusion in our institutional formulary. Data on patients' demographics, romiplostim doses, platelet counts, use of rescue medication and concurrent therapies were collected. Outcomes for effectiveness evaluation were proportion of patients who achieved a platelet response (platelet count >50 × 109 per litre and double the platelet count at baseline on any scheduled visit, excluding counts obtained within 8 weeks after receipt of rescue medications), proportion of patients who achieved a durable response (platelet responses during 6 or more weeks of the last 8 weeks of treatment), proportion of patients needing rescue medication, proportion of patients able to stop or reduce concurrent treatment and mean number of weekly platelet responses. Safety was assessed on the basis of the incidence of adverse events documented on the patients' medical records. Results and discussion This study enrolled ten adults and four paediatric patients. None of the paediatric patients and one adult patient had been splenectomized (contraindicated in the other adults). In the adult population, eight achieved a response at least once during treatment, and 1 achieved a durable response. Four patients needed rescue medication (mostly intravenous immunoglobulins). Three patients were able to stop concurrent ITP therapies, and the mean number of weekly platelet responses was 6. All four paediatric patients achieved a response at least once during treatment, and three achieved durable responses. Three patients needed rescue medication. The only patient who was receiving concurrent ITP medication was able to stop it, and the mean number of weekly platelet responses was 25. No serious adverse events were registered during treatment in either population. What is new and conclusion The effectiveness of romiplostim was variable with few adult patients achieving a durable response. Our paediatric patients responded better with most achieving a durable response. The treatment was safe for both groups of patients. Studies should be conducted to identify patients more likely to benefit from this treatment.

What is known and objective: The validation of a method for recording pharmaceutical interventions measures the instrument’s ability to provide consistent values when the same analysis is performed several times. Our aim was to validate the inter-rater reliability of the method used to record pharmaceutical interventions in our hospital. Methods: We recorded interventions in a database, entering variables related to the patient, treatment and impact of the recommendation. We also recorded the type, cause and clinical significance of the negative outcome associated with use of the medicinal product (NOM). Twenty interventions performed during a 3-year study period (2007–2009) were randomly tested for consistency to analyse the kappa (κ) coefficient statistic of the recommendations as coded by nine senior and junior clinical pharmacists. Results and discussion: There were 87·8% global consistency for NOM cause, 66·1% for intervention impact and 95·0% for NOM type. Agreement was substantial for ‘intervention reasons’, with a κ value of 0·74 (95%CI 0·61–0·87), fair for ‘intervention impact’, with a κ value of 0·24 (95%CI 0·15–0·32) and excellent for ‘NOM type’, with a κ value of 0·87 (95%CI 0·71–1·00), respectively. Our results are globally good, especially with regard to the analysis of intervention reasons and NOM type, which matches other authors’ findings. Furthermore, our validation method is suitable for recording and considering the impact of pharmaceutical interventions. What is new and conclusion: We describe a systematic method for clinical pharmacists to record their activities and assess their value. This methodology should help in the development of clinical pharmacy in Spain and should be translatable to other settings.