Search

Moving towards regional Supergrids, an increasing number of interconnections are formed by High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) lines. Currently, in most regions, HVDC losses are not considered in market operations, resulting in additional costs for Transmission System Operators (TSOs). Nordic TSOs have proposed the introduction of HVDC loss factors in the market clearing algorithm, to account for the cost of losses and avoid HVDC flows between zones with zero price difference. In this paper, we introduce a rigorous framework to assess the introduction of loss factors, in particular HVDC loss factors, in nodal and zonal pricing markets. First, we focus on the identification of an appropriate loss factor. We propose and compare three different models: constant, linear, and piecewise linear. Second, we introduce formulations to include losses in market clearing algorithms. Carrying numerical tests for a whole year, we find that accounting only for HVDC or AC losses may lead to lower social welfare for a non-negligible amount of time. To counter this, this paper introduces a framework for including both AC and HVDC losses in a zonal or nodal pricing environment. We show both theoretically and through simulations that such a framework is guaranteed to increase social welfare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Securing profits from energy, reserve capacity and balancing markets is critical to ensure the profitability of battery energy systems (BES). However, the intimate connection between offers on these trading floors combined with the limited energy storage capacity of BES renders its scheduling very complex. In this paper, we develop a bilevel optimization problem for strategic participation of a BES in the day-ahead energy-reserve and balancing markets, improving the state-of-the-art by (i) considering the conditional-value-at-risk; (ii) ensuring the real-time feasibility of the obtained day-ahead schedule; (iii) addressing the operational underperformance risk stemming from inaccurate battery modeling. In a case study, we illustrate how the proposed model allows risk-averse BES owners to hedge their day-ahead position without jeopardizing their expected profit, while ensuring the feasibility of their day-ahead schedule. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]