Search

In actual line-commutated converter based high- voltage direct-current (LCC-HVDC) projects, multiple HVDC transmission lines are usually installed on the same tower to save transmission corridors and reduce construction costs. However, electromagnetic coupling effect between adjacent lines can cause commutation failure (CF) in the non-fault poles when a line or pole fails. Hence, this paper deeply investigates the mechanism and the prevention strategy of CFs caused by line coupling effect in single- and double-circuit HVDC systems. The influencing factors of line coupling effect and the coupling characteristics under fault conditions are analyzed first based on the modeling of parallel transmission lines and the traveling wave theory. Then the mechanism of CF caused by line coupling effect is investigated with the consideration of different fault conditions, different line structures, and different system operation modes. Based on the above analyses, prevention strategies for CFs of non-fault poles in single- and double-circuit systems are proposed. Finally, the simulation results verify the correctness of the theoretical analyses and the effectiveness of the proposed control strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a line-commutated converter based high-voltage direct-current (LCC-HVDC) system, the inverter control system usually includes constant extinction angle (CEA) controller, constant current (CC) controller, current error controller (CEC), and voltage-dependent current order limiter (VDCOL). However, the interaction influence of multiple controllers may cause repetitive commutation failure (CF). For this purpose, this paper deeply investigates the mechanism and the influencing factors of repetitive CF caused by controller interaction. It is found that the lower limit value of CEA controller can affect the control switching process and thus the probability of repetitive CF. Besides, the minimum gamma measurement (MGM) unit prevents the system from acquiring the real extinction angle in time, which results in the DC current fluctuation during the recovery process. Moreover, the probability of control-induced repetitive CF is much higher when the HVDC inverter is connected to a weak AC system or the AC fault is not serious but not cleared in time. Based on the above analyses, an improved control method is proposed for recovery performance improvement, which is mainly realized by modifying the lower and upper limits of the CEA controller during recovery. Finally, the simulation and experimental results verify the theoretical analyses and the proposed control method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]