Search

The Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission was launched on November 2nd, 2009 aiming at providing sea surface salinity (SSS) estimates over the oceans with frequent temporal coverage. The detection and mitigation of residual instrumental systematic errors in the measured brightness temperatures are key steps prior to the SSS retrieval. For such purpose, the so-called ocean target transformation (OTT) technique is currently used in the SMOS operational SSS processor. In this paper, an assessment of the OTT is performed. It is found that, to compute a consistent and robust OTT, a large ensemble of measurements is required. Moreover, several effects are reported to significantly impact the OTT computation, namely, the apparent instrument (temporal) drift, forward model imperfections, auxiliary data (used by forward model) uncertainty and external error sources, such as galactic noise and Sun effects (among others). These effects have to be properly mitigated or filtered during the OTT computation, so as to successfully retrieve SSS from SMOS measurements. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

A prerequisite for the successful retrieval of geophysical parameters from remote sensing measurements is the development of an accurate forward model. The European Space Agency Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), carrying onboard an L-band interferometric radiometer (Microwave Interferometric Radiometer using Aperture Synthesis), was launched on November 2009. Due to the lack of L-band passive ocean measurements from space, several prelaunch forward models were developed and initially used in the SMOS ocean salinity operational processor. In this paper, an update of the prelaunch semi-empirical forward model is presented, using for the first time, real SMOS data. In particular, the ocean surface emissivity modulation at L-band due to rough sea surface is reviewed and reanalyzed. A new model definition is provided with the help of a simple neural network. The improvement is quantified in terms of retrieved salinity accuracy compared with the climatology and concerns essentially the range of wind speeds higher than 12 m·s-1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]