Search

Burden symptom in advanced heart failure highly affects quality of life of both patients and caregivers, leading to severe functional limitation and social isolation. Symptoms in the advanced phases of the disease are numerous and often underestimated and undertreated. This negatively affects not only quality of life, but also increases hospitalizations, reduces therapeutic adherence, impairs cardiac function and leads to reduced survival. When symptom control cannot be achieved only with specific cardiologic therapy, optimal care should shift to a combination of life-prolonging and symptom-relief approach, possibly to be initiated as soon as advanced phases are detected. Optimal treatment of severe and invalidating symptoms requires a multi-modal and multi-dimensional approach, as pharmacological therapy represents only a part of a global evaluation that should include spiritual and psycho-social factors, potentially influencing symptom perception. Assessment therefore should rely on multi-modal and multi-dimensional patient-centered score models, such as the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), or the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).Pain, dyspnea, depression, fatigue and less frequent but distressing symptoms, including gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, vomiting, fecal impaction, hiccups), cough, itching, skin xerosis and restless legs syndrome, will be analyzed, and evidence of best palliative practice will be discussed.

Early palliative care (PC) clearly demonstrated its efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF), reducing symptom burden, mainly pain and depression, improving quality of life, and reducing the access to the health care system. However, there are not conclusive data on economic cost reduction. The reasons are related to the few patients involved in the studies dedicated to this topic, to the different clinical settings, different modalities of provision and funding of PC, and different timing of PC implementation. PC was not shown to reduce mortality nor hospital readmissions in randomized trials.The unanswered questions will be clarified only in larger studies, defining specific clinical settings, goals to achieve and standardizing the provision and funding modalities in the different countries.

Palliative care is recognized as an approach that improves quality of life of patients and families facing life-threatening illnesses. This is achieved through prevention, early identification, assessment and treatment of symptoms and other psycho-social, spiritual and economic issues. Palliative care is not dependent on prognosis and can be delivered as "simultaneous care", together with disease-modifying treatments and adequate symptom relief. Palliative care relies on coordination across settings of care and offers open communication to patients and caregivers. Recently, there is increasing interest in the potential role of palliative care in refractory, advanced heart failure treated with optimal, maximized therapy.Heart failure is a chronic progressive syndrome characterized by periods of stability interrupted by acute exacerbations, usually leading to reduced functional status. It accounts for approximately one-third of deaths in industrialized countries and is a common cause of hospitalization. Fifty percent of patients with advanced heart failure die within 1 year of diagnosis and 50% of the remainder within 5 years. The trajectory of heart failure is often unpredictable and approximately 30% to 50% of patients die suddenly. Patients with heart failure suffer from numerous symptoms, often resistant to conventional treatments, frequently under-recognized and under-treated. Symptom assessment and control improve quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure; this can be managed at best by collaboration between specialistic teams.Although heart failure is a life-shortening condition, therapeutic and technological advances (such as left ventricular assist devices, coronary revascularization, percutaneous valve implantation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators) can help healthcare professionals in the management of patients with advanced heart failure, improving global condition and reducing the risk of sudden death. On the other hand, it has to be acknowledged that management of cardiovascular implanted electronic devices towards end of life requires awareness of legal, ethical, religious principles regarding potential withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies.Adequate communication with patients regarding adverse events, end of life, benefits vs burdens of therapies and interventions, treatment preferences, and decision-making should be an issue in early stages of disease. The process of advanced care planning should be clearly documented and regularly reviewed.Barriers to the provision of palliative care in heart failure include clinical issues (disease trajectory), prognostic uncertainty, failure in identification of patients who need palliative care and timing of referral to specialist services, but also misconceptions of patients, families and sanitary staff regarding the role of palliative care, organization problems, and finally educational and time issues.This document focuses on the need of further, coordinated research and work-out on: (i) identification of heart failure patients eligible for palliative care, in terms of clinical and social-psychological issues, (ii) identification of trigger events and timing of referral; (iii) identification of adequate performance indicators/scales for measurement, assessment and follow-up of symptoms and quality of life in end-stage heart failure, including patient-reported outcome measures; (iv) treatment, care and organization strategies and models for advanced/end-stage heart failure ("care management"); and (v) implementation of knowledge and education of healthcare professionals in the fields of communication, ethics, and advanced care planning in heart failure.