Search

More than 50 years after its introduction in clinical practice, the increase in the intensity of care offered by the cardiac intensive care units, the shift in the population of patients treated and the wider availability of circulatory supports, still makes the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) an essential tool for diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock. In this review, we will discuss how to identify those patients who can benefit most from its use, the configuration and the correct insertion technique of a PAC. A pragmatic guide will also be provided for the interpretation of the hemodynamic indexes (direct and calculated) that the PAC is able to reveal as well as a summary of the most common errors in reading or interpreting the pressure curves provided by the PAC. In this article, we will then present a practical guide on how to use the PAC in a modern cardiac intensive care unit.

The management of the patient with fever in the intensive cardiac care unit begins with a thorough evaluation of the patient, particularly symptoms, clinical history and physical examination, to provide information regarding the origin of the fever. The global evaluation of the patient should be integrated with blood and microbiological tests, in particular blood culture and swab. The laboratory, microbiologic or radiologic tests could be more or less detailed and targeted depending on the type of suspected infection and clinical conditions of the patient. When therapy is necessary, it is crucial to switch, as soon as possible, from broad spectrum antibiotic therapy to antibiotic therapy based on the results of the microbiological exams. Antibiotic therapy could be associated with antipyretic and specific organ support therapy when necessary.

Acute respiratory failure is a frequent complication of patients admitted to the intensive cardiac care unit and it is associated with a poor short- and long-term outcome. Acute respiratory failure can be managed with traditional oxygen therapy, with high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive ventilation or invasive ventilation according to clinical and blood gas condition. The use of advanced respiratory therapies is associated with both respiratory and hemodynamic effects, therefore the intensivist cardiologist should know deeply these respiratory devices. The intensivist cardiologist should perform an early diagnosis of acute respiratory failure, an appropriate selection of the respiratory device, and accurate monitoring and management to obtain clinical improvement and to avoid mechanical invasive ventilation.

The number of elderly patients admitted to cardiac intensive care units (CICU) is significantly increasing. Nowadays, novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools allow to treat the vast majority of cardiac acute diseases, nonetheless care of elderly patients requires a careful clinical evaluation. A favorable proportion of cost-effectiveness is warranted, aimed at avoiding futile procedures or treatments. On the other hand, the availability of minimally invasive procedures carries forward old limits to treatments in elderly patients in CICU. It appears evident that age cannot per se represent a limit in the care of elderly people. The present review gives insights in the management of the most common cardiovascular disease settings in elderly patients in the CICUs, thus providing important tools in complex decision-making.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with or without acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a subgroup with a challenging pharmacological management. Indeed, if on the one hand antithrombotic therapy should reduce the risk related to recurrent ischemic events and/or stent thrombosis, on the other hand care should be taken to avoid major bleeding events. In recent years, several trials, which overall included more than 12 000 patients, have been conducted demonstrating the safety of different therapeutic combinations of oral antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. In the present ANMCO position paper we propose a decision-making algorithm on antithrombotic strategies based on scientific evidence and expert consensus to be adopted in the periprocedural phase, at the time of hospital discharge and in the long-term follow-up of patients with AF undergoing PCI with/without ACS.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease have confirmed the particular vulnerability of this population. Indeed, not only a higher risk of contracting the infection has been reported, but also an increased occurrence of a more severe course and unfavorable outcome. Beyond the direct consequences of COVID-19, the pandemic has an enormous impact on global health systems. Screening programs and non-urgent tests have been postponed; clinical trials have suffered a setback. Similarly, in the area of cardiology care, a significant decline in ST-elevation myocardial infarction accesses and an increase in cases of late presenting heart attacks with increased mortality and complication rates have been reported. Health care systems must therefore get ready to tackle the "rebound effect" that will likely show a relative increase in the short and medium term incidence of diseases such as heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias and cardio- and cerebrovascular complications. Scientific societies are taking action to provide general guidance and recommendations aimed at mitigating the unfavorable outcomes of this pandemic emergency. Cardio-oncology, as an emerging discipline, is more flexible in modulating care pathways and represents a beacon of innovation in the development of multi-specialty patient management. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, cardio-oncology has rapidly modified its clinical care pathways and implemented flexible monitoring protocols that include targeted use of cardiac imaging, increased use of biomarkers, and telemedicine systems. The goal of these strategic adjustments is to minimize the risk of infection for providers and patients while maintaining standards of care for the treatment of oncologic and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this position paper is to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of cardio-oncologic patients with the-state-of-the-art knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in order to optimize medical strategies during and after the pandemic.

The treatment of patients with advanced acute heart failure is still challenging. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has widely been used in the management of patients with cardiogenic shock. However, according to international guidelines, its routinary use in patients with cardiogenic shock is not recommended. This recommendation is derived from the results of the IABP-SHOCK II trial, which demonstrated that IABP does not reduce all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. The present position paper, released by the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO), reviews the available data derived from clinical studies. It also provides practical recommendations for the optimal use of IABP in the treatment of cardiogenic shock and advanced acute heart failure. Data deriving from a national survey in Italian hospitals about IABP use are also provided.

One of the main tasks of a scientific society is to define the theoretical bases and appropriate management strategies with the aim to maintain a high-quality diagnostic and therapeutic standard. As far as echocardiography is concerned, the task of the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography is to provide appropriate, complete, and useful echocardiographic tests for clinical application, as well as procedural, technological, organizational and economic indications to be adopted in clinical practice. In addition, there is an increasing need for regulating access to echocardiographic assessment according to clinical priority, because of the huge proportion of patients who should undergo a first or follow-up echocardiographic evaluation. The aim of this document is to implement appropriateness in echocardiography for the study and follow-up of cardiovascular diseases, and to optimize demand on the basis of clinical priority classification criteria outlined by the scientific societies and used by the National Health Service. Besides cardiovascular diseases, this document also addresses other diseases that often require echocardiographic investigation, such as liver diseases, connective tissue diseases, endocrine diseases, peripheral vascular and oncological diseases. Although not included in the previous guidelines, clinical priority and followup criteria are defined also for these groups of diseases according to the available literature. In conclusion, this document aims at guaranteeing access to the diagnostic echocardiographic procedures provided by the National Health Service to the general population, with practical indications on how to solve the problem of waiting lists.

Patients with heart failure, marked systolic dysfunction and dys-synchronous myocardial contraction are at increased risk for exacerbated pump failure and arrhythmias, and suffer higher mortality rates. In these patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), achieved by a biventricular pacing, can lead to clinical improvement, reverse left ventricular remodeling and prolonged survival, although a substantial subset of non-responders has been reported. The electrocardiographic QRS width does not predict long-term CRT benefit, while direct measures of mechanical dyssynchrony obtained by various ultrasound techniques have been shown to have a better predictive value. However, currently there is no consensus on the optimal ultrasound technique to use for assessing mechanical dyssynchrony and select candidates for CRT. In this review, the clinical role of both conventional and new ultrasound techniques applied to the study of cardiac dyssynchrony will be discussed, focusing on patient selection for CRT.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is still a clinical challenging problem. In this report, we review the main characteristics of this entity. Epidemiology of MVP, which relies on the diagnostic criteria adopted, and the incidence of complications, both arrhythmic and structural, are influenced by the characteristics of the population studied, which may lead to bias in data interpretation. Even the definition of MVP may differ according to the cardiologist's or cardiac surgeon's point of view. Usually, cardiologists define MVP as the protrusion of all or part of the mitral leaflets into the left atrium, independent of maintenance of coaptation. Therefore, using this definition, mitral regurgitation is considered as a complication rather than a diagnostic criterion. Arrhythmias, either supraventricular or ventricular, are other possible complications, mostly not life-threatening and associated with myxomatous degeneration of the valve. Diagnosis of MVP is based on echocardiography, which provides detailed anatomic and functional evaluation of the affected valve. Leaflet thickness and motion as well as presence and severity of mitral regurgitation can be assessed, with important diagnostic and prognostic implications. Echocardiographic evaluation of the mitral valve requires a systematic approach in order to define the leaflet/scallop involved and the mechanisms of mitral regurgitation. To this aim, three-dimensional reconstruction may add further insights into objective rendering of mitral valve pathology. Finally, surgical timing in mitral regurgitation due to MVP is an evolving issue and the likelihood of surgical repair is a crucial factor in the optimal timing of surgical intervention, especially in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation.