Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the communication ability of individuals with trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 syndromes., Methods: Parents reported on children's potential communication acts, words, spontaneous gesture, and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) using a parent report inventory (n = 32; age range 3-35 years). Potential communicative acts are defined as behaviors produced by an individual that may be interpreted by others to serve communicative functions., Results: Potential communicative acts categorized as body movement displayed the highest median rank for reported occurrence followed by vocalization and facial expression. Although symbolic forms were ranked lower, more than half of the parents (66%) reported that their children produced at least one word, gesture or AAC form. Challenging behaviors or stereotypic movement displayed lowest median ranks., Conclusions: Results are discussed in terms of communication potential and the need to address AAC in trisomy 18 and 13.

Introduction: Neuropsychological functioning connects neuropathology and symptoms in schizophrenia. Previous work suggests that deficient initiation and inhibition underlie the psychomotor poverty and disorganisation syndromes, respectively. Furthermore, although the syndromes are associated with impairments in everyday functioning, cognitive competency (CC; cognitive skills for independent living) has been neglected as an outcome. This study tested a three-level model of schizophrenia pathology (Neuropsychological dysfunction --> Syndromes --> CC), using unstructured neuropsychological tasks to measure initiation and inhibition., Methods: Participants were 40 adults with schizophrenia. A verbal picture description and the Tinkertoy test yielded initiation and inhibition measures with good interrater reliability. Symptoms were rated using the SANS and SAPS, and an insight scale was administered. The Cognitive Competency Test utilised simulated situations to assess CC., Results: Initiation failed to predict psychomotor poverty, but affected CC directly. Only one indicator of disinhibition (intermingling of personal material into speech) predicted disorganisation, which, through mediation, led to CC deficits. Insight correlated with disorganisation and contributed to CC. Unique effects of initiation, disorganisation, and insight, combined, explained 58% of CC variance., Conclusions: Partial support for the three-level model was obtained. Specific neuropsychological abilities and symptoms explain a substantial proportion of the variance in cognitive competency.