Search

Introduction: No existing mass casualty triage system has been scientifically scrutinized or validated. A recent work group sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, using a combination of expert opinion and the extremely limited research data available, created the SALT (sort-assess-lifesaving interventions-treat/transport) triage system to serve as a national model. An airport crash drill was used to pilot test the SALT system., Objective: To assess the accuracy and speed with which trained paramedics can triage victims using this new system., Methods: Investigators created 50 patient scenarios with a wide range of injuries and severities, and two additional uninjured victims were added at the time of the drill. Students wearing moulage and coached on how to portray their injuries served as "victims." Assuming proper application of the SALT system, the patient scenarios were designed such that 16 patients would be triaged as T1/red/immediate, 12 as T2/yellow/delayed, 14 as T3/green/minimal, and 10 as T4/black/dead. Paramedics were trained to proficiency in the SALT system one week prior to the drill using a 90-minute didactic/practical session, and were given "flash cards" showing the triage algorithm to be used if needed during the drill. Observers blinded to the study purpose timed and recorded the triage process for each patient during the drill. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data., Results: The two paramedics assigned to the role of triage officers applied the SALT algorithm correctly to 41 of the 52 patients (78.8% accuracy). Seven patients intended to be T2 were triaged as T1, and two patients intended to be T3 were triaged as T2, for an overtriage rate of 13.5%. Two patients intended to be T2 were triaged as T3, for an undertriage rate of 3.8%. Triage times were recorded by the observers for 42 of the 52 patients, with a mean of 15 seconds per patient (range 5-57 seconds)., Conclusions: The SALT mass casualty triage system can be applied quickly in the field and appears to be safe, as measured by a low undertriage rate. There was, however, significant overtriage. Further refinement is needed, and effect on patient outcomes needs to be evaluated.

Objectives: Emergency medical dispatch (EMD) protocols are intended to match response resources with patient needs. In a small city that previously sent a first-responder basic life support (BLS) engine company lights-and-siren response to every emergency medical services (EMS) call, regardless of nature or severity, an EMD system was implemented in order to reduce the number of such responses. The study objectives were to determine the effects of the EMD system on first-responder call volume and to assess the safety of the system., Methods: This was a prospective, before-after trial. Using computer-assisted dispatch (CAD) records, all EMS calls in the 120 days before implementation of the EMD protocol and the 120 days after implementation were identified (excluding a one-month wash-in period). In the "after" phase, patient care reports of a random sample of cases in which an ambulance was dispatched with no first responders was manually reviewed to assess whether there might have been any benefit to first-responder dispatch. Given the lack of accepted clinical criteria for need for first responders, the investigators' clinical judgment was used. Paired t-tests were used to compare groups., Results: There were 9,820 EMS calls in the "before" phase, with 8,278 first-responder engine runs (84.3%), and 9,943 EMS calls in the "after" phase, with 3,804 first-responder engine runs (39.1%). The first-responder companies were dispatched to a median of 5.65 runs/day (range 1.1-12.7) in the "before" phase, and 3.17 runs/day (range 0.6-5.0) in the "after" phase (p = 0.0008 by paired t-test). Review of 1,816 "after" phase ambulance-only patient care reports (PCRs) found ten (0.55%) in which first-responder dispatch might have been beneficial, but review of EMS and emergency department (ED) records found no adverse outcomes in these ten patients., Conclusions: This study suggests that a formal EMD system can reduce first-responder call volume by roughly one-half. The system appears to be safe for patients, with an undertriage rate of about one-half of one percent.

Introduction: Existing mass casualty triage systems do not consider the possibility of chemical, biological, or radiologic/nuclear (CBRN) contamination of the injured patients. A system that can triage injured patients who are or may be contaminated by CBRN material, developed through expert opinion, was pilot-tested at an airport disaster drill. The study objective was to determine the system's speed and accuracy., Methods: For a drill involving a plane crash with release of organophosphate material from the cargo hold, 56 patient scenarios were generated, with some involving signs and symptoms of organophosphate toxicity in addition to physical trauma. Prior to the drill, the investigators examined each scenario to determine the "correct" triage categorization, assuming proper application of the proposed system, and trained the paramedics who were expected to serve as triage officers at the drill. During the drill, the medics used the CBRN triage system to triage the 56 patients, with two observers timing and recording the events of the triage process. The IRB deemed the study exempt from full review., Results: The two triage officers applied the CBRN system correctly to 49 of the 56 patients (87.5% accuracy). One patient intended to be T2 (yellow) was triaged as T1 (red), for an over-triage rate of 1.8%. Five patients intended to be T1 were triaged as T2, and one patient intended to be T2 was triaged as T3 (green), for an under-triage rate of 10.7%. All six under-triage cases were due to failure to recognize or account for signs of organophosphate toxidrome in applying the triage system. For the 27 patients for whom times were recorded, triage was accomplished in a mean of 19 seconds (range 4-37, median 17)., Conclusions: The chemical algorithm of the proposed CBRN-capable mass casualty triage system can be applied rapidly by trained paramedics, but a significant under-triage rate (10.7%) was seen in this pilot test. Further refinement and testing are needed, and effect on outcome must be studied.

Objective: Emergency medical dispatch (EMD) protocols should match response resources with patient needs. We tested a protocol sending only a commercial ambulance, without fire department first responders (FR), to all non-cardiac-arrest EMS calls at a physician-staffed HMO facility. Study objectives were to determine how often FR provided patient care at such facilities and whether EMD implementation could conserve FR resources without compromising patient care., Methods: All EMS dispatches to this facility in the 4 months before implementation of the EMD protocol and 4 months after implementation were identified through dispatch records, and all FR and ambulance patient care reports were reviewed. In the "after" phase, all cases needing ALS transport were reviewed to examine whether there would have been benefit to FR dispatch., Results: Of 242 dispatches in the "before" phase, BLS FR responded to 156 (64%), and ALS FR to 117 (48%). BLS FR provided patient care in 2 cases, and ALS FR in 17. Of 227 dispatches in the "after" phase, BLS FR responded to 10 (4%), and ALS FR to 10 (4%); all but one were protocol violations. BLS FR provided care in one case, and ALS FR in three. Review of the 93 "after" cases requiring ALS transport found none where FR presence would have been beneficial., Conclusions: First responders rarely provided patient care when responding to EMS calls at a physician-staffed medical facility. Implementation of an EMD protocol can safely reduce the number of FR responses to unscheduled ambulance calls at such a facility.

Objective: To determine if a single mailing from the local volunteer fire department can increase the number of homes with proper, visible address numbering. Proper numbering is essential in rapidly locating a house during an emergency response., Methods: The study was conducted at a suburban/rural fire department providing EMS and fire suppression services to a 22 square mile area with residential mailboxes located at the street. During a hazard identification pre-plan tour, each house was examined and assigned a classification: (A) No number visible on the house or mailbox (improper); (B) Number on only one side of the mailbox (improper); (C) Number on both sides or the end of the mailbox, or visible on the house (proper). The homeowners of all residences with improper numbering (A or B) were sent a one-page letter, discussing the need for proper numbering. The tour was repeated six weeks later to determine whether deficiencies had been corrected. It was prospectively determined that a 25% improvement was sought., Results: During the pre-plan tour, 73 houses were classified as type A, 454 as type B, and 1706 as type C. At the re-visit, 135 (26%) of the type A and B homes had been properly numbered. Correction of deficiencies was better at type A homes (37, or 51%) than at type B homes (98, or 22%) (p < 0.001 by Chi-square)., Conclusion: For houses with improper numbering, a single mailing from the fire department can be effective in encouraging residents to post proper numbers.

Objectives: Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels can be estimated by chemical analysis of exhaled alveolar breath. Such noninvasive measurement could be used on the fireground to screen both firefighters (FFs) and victims. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a hand-held carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring device to screen for CO toxicity in FFs under field conditions., Methods: Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Using a hand-held breath CO detection device, COHb readings were collected at baseline, and then as FFs exited burning buildings after performing interior fire attack and overhaul with self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) during live-fire training. Ambient CO levels were occasionally measured in interior areas where the FFs were working to assess the degree of CO exposure., Results: Baseline COHb readings of 64 FFs ranged from 0% to 3% (mean 1%, median 1%). One hundred eighty-four COHb readings were collected during training exercises. The mean and median COHb levels were 1%. The maximum value in a FF wearing SCBA was 3%; values of 14%, 5%, and 4% were measured in instructors who were not properly wearing SCBA. Ambient CO readings during fire attack ranged from 75 to 1,290 ppm, and the ambient CO reading for overhaul ranged from 0 to 130 ppm. When the device was used for interior CO monitoring, washout time limited its utility for COHb monitoring in FFs., Conclusions: A hand-held CO monitoring device adapted for estimation of COHb levels by exhaled breath analysis can feasibly be deployed on the fireground to assess CO exposure in FFs.