Search

Intranasal administration of ovalbumin (OVA) formulated in an archaeal lipid mucosal vaccine adjuvant and delivery (AMVAD) system prepared by the addition of CaCl2 to small unilamellar archaeosomes (liposomes made from archaeal polar lipids) containing encapsulated OVA, was recently shown to elicit strong and sustained OVA-specific mucosal and systemic immune responses. In this study, we show that the centrifugation/washing and antigen quantization steps required in the standard protocol for obtaining OVA/AMVAD model vaccine formulations can be eliminated by using simpler protocols such as admixing OVA with preformed empty archaeosomes, or by changing the starting ratio (w/w) of archaeal lipid to antigen at the archaeosome preparation stage, prior to the addition of CaCl2 to convert to the AMVAD structures. Irrespective of the vaccine preparation protocol, the AMVAD particle typically comprised of larger spherical structures that had aggregated like a bunch of grapes, and it contained aqueous compartment(s). The anti-OVA IgA antibody responses in vaginal wash, nasal wash, serum, and bile samples, and the anti-OVA IgG antibody responses in sera, in mice intranasally immunized with the OVA/AMVAD formulations prepared by the simplified or the standard protocols, were comparable.

The present study evaluated the potential of archaesomes, prepared from the total polar lipids extracted from Methanobrevibacter smithii, as adjuvants for combination (multivalent) vaccines. Groups of Balb/c mice were immunized subcutaneously at day 0 and 21 with one of the following vaccines: trivalent vaccine formulated by the simultaneous co-encapsulation of bovine serum albumine (BSA), ovalbumin (OVA) and hen egg lysozyme (HEL) into archaeosomes (CEC vaccine); an univalent archaeosome vaccine (UVE vaccine) containing either BSA, OVA or HEL; or an admixture vaccine (AMC vaccine) consisting of the three UVE vaccines. Serum specific antibody (IgG + M) responses were determined at day 32, 112 and 203, and specific IgG1 and IgG2a responses were determined at day 112. Mice immunized with the CEC of AMC vaccine developed strong and sustained specific antibody responses to all three antigens at a magnitude similar to those seen in control mice immunized with UVE vaccines. Moreover, the serum BSA-, OVA-, and HEL-specific IgG1 and IgG2a levels in the CEC and AMC immunized mice were overall comparable to those of the UVE immunized control mice. Boosting CEC and AMC vaccinated mice with antigens alone at day 203 elicited strong antibody memory responses, comparable to those in the UVE vaccinated groups. These results show that archaeosomes could be used as adjuvants in developing combination vaccines.

Archaeosomes, liposomes prepared from the polar ether lipids extracted from Archaea, demonstrate great potential as immunomodulating carriers of soluble antigens, promoting humoral and cell mediated immunity in the vaccinated host. The safety of unilamellar archaeosomes prepared from the total polar lipids (TPL) of Halobacterium salinarum, Methanobrevibacter smithii or Thermoplasma acidophilum was evaluated in female BALB/c mice using ovalbumin (OVA) as the model antigen. Groups of 6-8 mice were injected (0.1 mL final volume) subcutaneously at 0 and 21 days, with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), 11 microg OVA in PBS, 1.25 mg of antigen-free archaeosomes in PBS (ca 70 mg/kg body wt), or PBS containing 11-20 microg OVA encapsulated in 1.25mg archaeosomes. Animals were monitored daily for injection site reactions, body weight,temperature and clinical signs of adverse reactions. Sera were collected on days 1, 2, 22, and 39 for analyses of creatine phosphokinase. Mice were sacrificed on 39 d, sera were collected for biochemical analyses, and major organs (liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, lungs) were weighed and examined macroscopically. There were no indications of adverse reactions or toxicity associated with any of the archaeosome adjuvants. None of the antigen-free archaeosomes elicited significant anti lipid antibodies when subcutaneously injected (1 mg each at 0, 1, 2, and 4 weeks) in mice, although anti H. salinarum lipid antibodies were detected. These antilipid antibodies cross-reacted with the TPL of T. acidophilum archaeosomes but not with the TPL of M. smithii archaeosomes nor with lipids of ester liposomes made from L-alpha-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC), L-alpha-dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG), and cholesterol (CHOL). In vitro hemolysis assay on mouse erythrocytes indicated no lysis with M. smithii or T. acidophilum archaeosomes at up to 2.5 mg/mL concentration. At this concentration, H. salinarum archaeosomes and DMPC/DMPG/CHOL ester liposomes caused about 2% and 4% hemolysis, respectively. Based on this mouse model evaluation, archaeosomes are well-tolerated and appear relatively safe for potential vaccine applications.

The biodistribution of orally and intravenously administered archaeosomes in mice was compared to that of archaeosomes containing either coenzyme Q10 (archaeosome-CoQ10), polyethylene glycol (archaeosome-PEG), or PEG plus CoQ10 (archaeosome-PEG-CoQ10). The archaeosome formulations were prepared by a reverse-phase evaporation method using the total polar lipids from the archaeobacterium Methanosarcina mazei. In the case of oral gavage, the most striking observation was that a significantly (p < 0.05) higher concentration (42.28+/-4.17%) of administered dose was found in the stomach content 3 h after administration of unmodified archaeosomes, as compared to that of archaeosome-CoQ10 (16.98+/-2.48%) and archaeosome-PEG-CoQ10 (5.8 +/-4.05"/ vesicles. This correlated with an increased uptake, notably of the archaeosome-PEG-CoQ 0 vesicles.,into liver and spleen; however, no more than 7% of the administered dose was found in liver, spleen and blood at any time point studied. In the case of intravenous administration, a significantly higher percentage of injected dose of unmodified archaeosomes was found in the liver (66.4 +/-.92%) and spleen (11.445+/-.68%) at 48 h, compared to archaeosome-CoQ10, archaeosome-PEG, and archaeosome-PEG-CoQ10 vesicles. The combination of PEG and CoQ10 significantly prolonged the circulation of archaeosomes in the blood, but after 48 h the amount of the vesicle marker in blood had declined to only about 0.5% of administered dose. These data indicate that the biodistribution of archaeosome formulations given orally or intravenously can be altered significantly by incorporating PEG or CoQ 10, alone or in combination, and these vesicles have the potential to act as a carrier for therapeutics and vaccines.

Liposomes are artificial, spherical, closed vesicles consisting of one or more lipid bilayer(s). Liposomes made from ester phospholipids have been studied extensively over the last 3 decades as artificial membrane models. Considerable interest has been generated for applications of liposomes in medicine, including their use as diagnostic reagents, as carrier vehicles in vaccine formulations, or as delivery systems for drugs, genes, or cancer imaging agents. The objective of this article is to review the properties and potential applications of novel liposomes made from the membrane lipids of Archaeobacteria (Archaea). These lipids are unique and distinct from those encountered in Eukarya and Bacteria. Polar glycerolipids make up the bulk of the membrane lipids, with the remaining neutral lipids being primarily squalenes and other hydrocarbons. The polar lipids consist of regularly branched, and usually fully saturated, phytanyl chains of 20, 25, or 40 carbon length, with the 20 and 40 being most common. The phytanyl chains are attached via ether bonds to the sn-2,3 carbons of the glycerol backbone(s). It has been shown only recently that total polar lipids of archaeobacteria, and purified lipid fractions therefrom, can form liposomes. We refer to liposomes made with any lipid composition that includes ether lipids characteristic of Archaeobacteria as archaeosomes to distinguish them from vesicles made from the conventional lipids obtained from eukaryotic or eubacterial sources or their synthetic analogs. In general, archaeosomes demonstrate relatively higher stabilities to oxidative stress, high temperature, alkaline pH, action of phospholipases, bile salts, and serum proteins. Some archaeosome formulations can be sterilized by autoclaving, without problems such as fusion or aggregation of the vesicles. The uptake of archaeosomes by phagocytic cells can be up to 50-fold greater than that of conventional liposome formulations. Studies in mice have indicated that systemic administration of several test antigens entrapped within certain archaeosome compositions give humoral immune responses that are comparable to those obtained with the potent but toxic Freund's adjuvant. Archaeosome compositions can be selected to give a prolonged, sustained immune response, and the generation of a memory response. Tissue distribution studies of archaeosomes administered via various systemic and peroral routes indicate potential for targeting to specific organs. All in vitro and in vivo studies performed to date indicate that archaeosomes are safe and do not invoke any noticeable toxicity in mice. The stability, tissue distribution profiles, and adjuvant activity of archaeosome formulations indicate that they may offer a superior alternative to the use of conventional liposomes, at least for some biotechnology applications.