1. Sitagliptin and other ‘gliptins’– why prescribe them?
- Author
-
Simon B. Dimmitt and Sheila A Doggrell
- Subjects
Pharmacology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Unstable angina ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Type 2 diabetes ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,medicine.disease ,Placebo ,Clinical trial ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Heart failure ,Sitagliptin ,medicine ,Empagliflozin ,Pharmacology (medical) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Introduction: In 2008, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) required all new glucose-lowering therapies to show cardiovascular safety, and this applies to the dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors (‘gliptins’). At present, there is contradictory evidence on whether the gliptins increase hospitalizations for heart failure. Areas covered: This is an evaluation of the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) in high risk cardiovascular subjects with type 2 diabetes [1]. TECOS demonstrated non-inferiority for sitagliptin over placebo for the primary outcome, which was cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. There was no difference in the rate of hospitalization for heart failure between sitagliptin and placebo. Expert Opinion: Despite the results of TECOS, debate over the effects of sitagliptin on the rates of hospitalizations for heart failure continues with some recent studies suggesting increased rate...
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF