Search

Objective: To compare real-world treatment persistence, dose escalation, rates of opportunistic or serious infections, and healthcare costs in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) receiving vedolizumab (VDZ) vs ustekinumab (UST) in the United States., Methods: A retrospective observational study in adults with CD initiated on VDZ or UST on/after 26 September 2016, was performed using the IBM Truven Health MarketScan databases (1 January 2009-30 September 2018). Rates of treatment persistence, dose escalation, opportunistic or serious infection-related encounters, and healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) were evaluated. Entropy balancing was used to balance patient characteristics between cohorts. Event rates were assessed using weighted Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared between cohorts using log-rank tests. Healthcare costs were compared between cohorts using weighted 2-part models., Results: 589 VDZ and 599 UST patients were included (172 [29.2%] and 117 [19.5%] were bio-naïve, respectively). After weighting, baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. No significant difference in rates of treatment persistence (12-month: VDZ, 76.5%; UST, 82.1%; p  = .17), dose escalation (12-month: VDZ, 29.3%; UST, 32.7%; p  = .97), or opportunistic or serious infection-related encounters were observed between VDZ and UST. Total mean healthcare costs were significantly lower for patients treated with VDZ vs UST (mean cost difference = -$5051 PPPM; p  < .01). Findings were consistent in bio-naïve patients., Conclusions: In this real-world study, similar treatment persistence, dose escalation, and rates of opportunistic or serious infections were observed with VDZ- and UST-treated patients with CD. However, VDZ was associated with a significantly lower cost outlay for healthcare systems.

Objectives: To compare treatment patterns and costs among psoriasis patients with and without metabolic conditions newly initiating a biologic or apremilast., Methods: Adult patients included had ≥1 prescription for secukinumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, etanercept, or apremilast between 01/01/2015 and 08/31/2018 (date of first prescription was index date) and no index drug use in the 12-months pre-index, and continuous enrollment in the 12-month pre-index and 24-month post-index periods. Patients were divided into mutually exclusive treatment cohorts and stratified by their pre-index metabolic condition status. Treatment patterns (adherence, non-persistence, switching, discontinuation, use of combination therapy, and re-initiation) and healthcare costs were compared., Results: Overall, 7773 patients were included; 47.5-56.7% had a metabolic condition. Except for the apremilast group, patients with metabolic conditions had higher discontinuation (secukinumab: 50.6% vs. 43.7%; adalimumab*: 53.9% vs. 48.7%; ustekinumab*: 41.9% vs. 35.1%; etanercept: 42.8% vs. 41.2%; apremilast: 43.1% vs. 46.1%) and switching (secukinumab: 48.1% vs. 41.2%; adalimumab*: 47.8% vs. 41.9%; ustekinumab*: 34.5% vs. 25.3%; etanercept*: 53.6% vs. 51.5%; apremilast: 45.8% vs. 44.6%) than patients without (* p  < .05). Patients with metabolic conditions incurred significantly higher costs., Conclusion: Many psoriasis patients initiating biologics or apremilast had metabolic conditions. These patients had higher discontinuation and switching, and significantly higher healthcare costs.

Background: There is limited evidence regarding biologics dosing patterns and its costs among psoriasis patients in the United Kingdom (UK). Objective: This retrospective study assessed biologics dose increase beyond labelled dose and associated UK pharmacy costs in moderate to severe psoriasis patients. Methods: Adult psoriasis patients on biologic prescription for ≥12 continuous months between January 2010 and March 2015 with their diagnosis recorded in the UK Hospital Treatment Insights Database within one month of such prescription were included. The proportion of patients receiving ≥30% higher the average daily maintenance dose as per the UK product label, and associated 12-month costs were reported. Results: The study included 362 patients, receiving adalimumab (48%), etanercept (17%), ustekinumab (12%), and infliximab (23%). Beyond labelled dose increase was noted in 14% adalimumab, 20% etanercept, 18% ustekinumab and 28% infliximab patients with an associated mean annual extra cost per patient of £7936, £5912, £2422 and £2275, respectively. Conclusion: Dose increase beyond labelled dose of biologics was commonly observed in moderate to severe psoriasis in the UK and resulted in substantial annual incremental pharmacy costs.

Purpose: To compare the cost-effectiveness of the newly approved biologic drug, brodalumab, with other commonly used biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the United States., Methods: An economic model was constructed in Excel to compare average costs to achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, 90 and 100 among moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients treated with biologics. Total annual costs to health plans associated with treatment with five different biologics were estimated and cost-effectiveness compared using the estimated average cost per PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100., Results: Total annual costs to a health plan per patient with adalimumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab were estimated at $51,246, $38,538, $65,484, $57,510 and $57,013. Mean annual treatment costs per PASI 75, 90 and 100 were the lowest for brodalumab, with the annual cost per PASI 75 for brodalumab, adalimumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab estimated at $48,782, $82,655, $77,957, $75,671 and $87,243, per PASI 90 at $51,383, $119,178, $94,904, $108,509 and $130,615, and per PASI 100 at $87,585, $284,702, $176,983, $205,393, and $366,645., Conclusions: Brodalumab, which had the lowest drug cost and high drug efficacy, was associated with the lowest cost per PASI 75, 90 and 100 among the biologics evaluated.

Background: Biologics have been shown to improve the outcomes of patients with psoriasis but their cost is an issue., Objective: Determine the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve a 75%/90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75/90) and evaluate the incremental cost per PASI-75/90 responder (CPR) relative to placebo in Japan., Methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the relative probabilities of achieving PASI-75/90 and NNTs. Drug costs were assessed based on Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Agency-approved dosing. The CPR was estimated for a short-term induction period and first year of treatment., Results: Compared with placebo, the PASI-75 NNT was 1.27 for adalimumab 80 mg, 1.29 for secukinumab 150 mg, 1.36 for secukinumab 300 mg, 1.57 for adalimumab 40 mg, 1.68 for ustekinumab 90 mg, 1.97 for ustekinumab 45 mg and 2.00 for infliximab 5 mg/kg. The short-term PASI-75 CPR relative to placebo was $5,062 for secukinumab 150 mg, $8209 for adalimumab 40 mg, $10,654 for secukinumab 300 mg, $11,754 for adalimumab 80 mg, $15,407 for ustekinumab 45 mg, $19,147 for infliximab 5 mg/kg and $26,257 for ustekinumab 90 mg. A similar ranking was observed for one-year PASI-75 CPRs and PASI-90 NNTs and CPRs., Conclusion: Adalimumab 40 mg/80 mg and secukinumab 150 mg/300 mg were the most efficacious and cost-efficient for patients with psoriasis in Japan.

Objective: To compare the cost consequence of biologic drugs for moderate-to-severe psoriasis from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System., Methods: We built a decision tree with a two-year time horizon. Efficacy data for biologics (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab) were drawn from published meta-analyses: PASI75 for the induction phase and PASI90 for the rest of follow-up. Patients with PASI < 75 at week 10-16 were switched to another biologic agent. Efficacy at week 24 was considered the highest possible efficacy for each drug and assumed to remain constant throughout the two-year period. Only drug treatment costs were used. The number needed to treat (NNT), annual cost per patient, annual cost per patient with PASI90 (cost per responder) and cost of primary failure (PASI < 75 at first efficacy evaluation) were calculated., Results: Secukinumab monotherapy was associated with the lowest cost per responder, followed by infliximab and ustekinumab. Treatment sequences starting with secukinumab were the most efficient, having the lowest NNT and cost per responder. Although the annual cost per treatment is similar for all drugs, there are huge differences in the cost per responder., Conclusions: Secukinumab as first-line biologic treatment is the most efficient treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the short-to-medium term.

Background: This study described the number of patients with psoriasis receiving flexible (continuous/intermittent) dosing with etanercept (ETN) and the real-world economic impact., Methods: BeFlex was a prospective, observational study with a ≥1 year follow-up. Patients ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who were starting or re-starting treatment with ETN in alignment with Belgian reimbursement criteria were included. Cost of ETN was compared with cost of adalimumab, ustekinumab and infliximab using estimates from the National Institute for Sickness and Disability Insurance (INAMI/RIZIV)., Results: In the flexible-dosing cohort (n = 121 with dose-regimen data), 66% were treated continuously and 34% intermittently. Baseline characteristics were similar across dosing cohorts. In the per-protocol cohort (n = 138), average ETN treatment duration/year was 40 weeks; 43 weeks continuous and 33 weeks intermittent. The overall mean interruption duration was 3.9 weeks/treatment cycle; 0.2 week continuous and 11.1 weeks intermittent. Mean dose/year was 2065 mg; 2182 mg continuous and 1660 mg intermittent. Flexible ETN dosing reduced the cost by 20% versus INAMI/RIZIV estimates. The theoretical cost of the other continuously-dosed biologics was 28-44% higher than that of flexible ETN., Conclusion: Approximately one-third of Belgian patients received intermittent ETN treatment. Flexible ETN dosing was more cost-effective than treatment with biologic agents that require continuous dosing.

Background: It is not clear how to best use biologics in the treatment of psoriasis. Our objective was to assess use of a protocol for biological therapies (BT) in psoriasis., Methods: A consensus protocol was established that included the indications for BT and dose optimization. Patient's characteristics, effectiveness, and cost of BT were analyzed before and after the implementation with two cross-sectional studies to assess its impact., Results: About 106 were treated before the protocol and 118 patients were treated after. After implementing the protocol, the dose was reduced in 43.4% of the patients receiving adalimumab, in 37.5% for etanercept, in 28.6% for infliximab, and in 14.7% for ustekinumab. No statistically significant differences were found in PASI score after the implementation of the protocol, except for the percentage of patients that achieved PASI 75 with ustekinumab, which was slightly higher. The global yearly savings achieved with the protocol implementation were 115,969 €., Conclusions: The protocol helped to increase the efficiency of BT, with decreasing doses of BT without affecting treatment effectiveness.