Search

Purpose and objective Auto planning might reduce the manual time required for the optimization and could also potentially improve the overall plan quality. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the statistical comparison of automatic (AU) and manually (MA) generated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Materials and methods The study included 105 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, admitted to our hospital. The patients underwent IMRT treatments. The clinically delivered plans were performed with Eclipse (Version 11.0) using manual optimization. The same plans were optimized successively in PinnacleTM3 (version 9.10) treatment planning system using the auto plan software package module. D95 (dose of 95% volume) and D98 (dose of 98% volume) were calculated for the targets and maximum dose (Dmax) and mean dose (Dmean) for the organ at risks (OARs); moreover, the average doses of each target and OARs for 105 patients were evaluated. Results There is no significant difference in the homogeneity of the target between AU and MA treatment plans, while a significant difference is observed for what is concerning the OARs or most of OARs in 105 patients, OAR doses were significantly reduced in AU plan. For OARs which have no significant difference between AU and MA plans are highlighted, the mean dose of OARs in AU plans was at least not higher than MA plans. Conclusion Nasopharyngeal carcinoma IMRT plans made by an automatic planning tool met the clinical requirements for target prescription dose; moreover, the dose of normal tissues was lower than in MA plans. Clinical physicists' time can be saved and the influence of factors such as the lack of experience in treatment planning can be avoided.

For patients with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) accompanied by obstructive hydrocephalus, external ventricular drainage (EVD) alone is proven to be often insufficient, and lumbar drainage (LD) is proven promising but considered contraindicative in the acute phase. The objective was to analyze the safety and feasibility of treatment for IVH with early continuous LD (CLD) in addition to open EVD regardless of the presence of acute obstructive hydrocephalus.In this prospective study, 10 consecutive patients with moderate to severe IVH received emergency EVD and early CLD insertion regardless of the presence of obstructive hydrocephalus or blood clots in the third and fourth ventricles. During the whole course of treatment, the EVD was kept open at a safe height until replaced by CLD alone. When the drained CSF from CLD was nearly normal, gradual weaning of the CLD was attempted. Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt would be performed if there was evidence of communicating hydrocephalus.In all the cases, EVD could be safely replaced by CLD alone. There was no evidence of axial herniation or infection, and no requirement of EVD revision. After CLD weaning, only two patients underwent VP shunt procedure. Follow-up study on 3 months and 6 months demonstrated that 7 (70%) patients had good (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 4 to 5) outcome and 1 (10%) patient died 1 month after discharge due to renal failure.RESULTS suggest that this new therapy which combines EVD with early CLD insertion is safe and easy to manage moderate to severe IVH with obstructive hydrocephalus.