DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are potentially lethal lesions that can occur spontaneously during normal cell metabolism, by treatment of cells with DNA-damaging agents, or during programmed recombination processes (54). There are two major pathways to repair DSBs: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). NHEJ involves the religation of the two ends of the broken chromosome and can occur with high fidelity or be accompanied by a gain or loss of nucleotides at the junction (9). Repair of two-ended DSBs by HR generally occurs by gene conversion resulting from a transfer of information from the intact donor duplex to the broken chromosome (Fig. (Fig.1).1). HR occurs preferentially during S and G2 when a sister chromatid is available to template repair (2, 19, 22). Sister-chromatid recombination events are genetically silent, whereas gene conversion between nonsister chromatids associated with an exchange of flanking markers can result in extensive loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or chromosome rearrangements (3, 21). One-ended DSBs that arise by replication fork collapse or by erosion of uncapped telomeres are thought to repair by strand invasion into homologous duplex DNA followed by replication to the end of the chromosome, a process referred to as break-induced replication (BIR) (35). BIR appears to be suppressed at two-ended breaks, presumably because it can lead to extensive LOH if it occurs between homologues or to chromosome translocations when strand invasion initiates within dispersed repeated sequences (5, 28, 31, 50, 52, 55). FIG. 1. Models for gene conversion and BIR. After formation of a DSB, the ends are resected to generate 3′ single-strand DNA tails. One end undergoes Rad51-dependent strand invasion to prime DNA synthesis from the invading 3′ end templated by ... The strand invasion step of BIR is assumed to be the same as that for gene conversion based on the requirement for the same HR proteins: Rad51, Rad52, Rad54, Rad55, and Rad57 (10). However, subsequent steps in BIR are less well defined. Recent studies of the fate of the invading end during BIR in diploid strains with polymorphic chromosome III homologues using a plasmid-based assay have shown that following strand invasion, the invading end is capable of dissociating from the initial homologous template. Following dissociation, the displaced end subsequently reinvades into the same or a different chromosome III homologue by a process termed template switching (52). One of the interesting features of the template switching events is that they occur over a region of about 10 kb downstream of the site of strand invasion and do not extend over the entire left arm of chromosome III. There are a number of possible mechanisms that could account for this apparent change in the processivity of BIR. First, it is possible that the strand invasion intermediate is cleaved by a structure-specific nuclease and once the invading strand is covalently joined to one of the template strands, the strand invasion process is irreversible. Recent studies of Schizosaccharomyces pombe have shown an essential role for Mus81, a structure-specific nuclease, in resolution of sister chromatid recombination intermediates during repair of collapsed replication forks (48). Another possibility is that there could be a switch between a translesion DNA polymerase and a highly processive DNA polymerase during BIR. The translesion polymerases in budding yeast, polymerase ζ (Pol ζ) and Pol η, are encoded by REV3-REV7 and RAD30, respectively (34, 40, 43). Deletion of REV3 has been shown to increase the fidelity of DNA synthesis associated with HR but has no effect on the overall frequency of DSB-induced HR (16). Deletion of POLη in chicken DT40 cells reduces the frequency of DSB-induced gene conversion, and human POL η has been shown to extend the invading 3′ end of D-loop intermediates in vitro (23, 36). However, this same preference for Pol η is not found for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Instead, DNA synthesis during meiotic and mitotic recombination appears to be carried out by Pol δ, one of the three nuclear replicative polymerases, which normally functions with Pol α in Okazaki fragment synthesis (13, 32, 33, 44). Pol ɛ is thought to be the primary leading-strand polymerase (47), but in the absence of the Pol ɛ catalytic domain, Pol δ is presumed to carry out leading-strand synthesis (24). Recent studies by Lydeard et al. (30) have shown a requirement for the lagging-strand polymerases, Pol δ and Pol α, to form the initial primer extension product during BIR, and Pol ɛ is required to complete replication to the end of the chromosome. In contrast, repair of DSBs by gene conversion does not require Pol α, and there appears to be functional redundancy between Pol δ and Pol ɛ (56). To address the roles of Mus81, Pol δ, and Pol η in BIR and in particular template switching, we used the transformation-based BIR assay with diploids with polymorphic chromosome III homologues. Because the transformation assay can only be used with strains with viable mutations of replication factors, we used a null allele of POL32, encoding a nonessential subunit of the Pol δ complex (14), and a point mutation in the gene encoding the essential catalytic subunit, POL3. The pol3-ct allele results in a truncation removing the last four amino acids of the Pol3 protein; the C-terminal region of Pol3 is implicated in interaction with the other essential subunit of the Pol δ complex, Pol31 (15, 49). The interesting feature of the pol3-ct allele is that it decreases the length of gene conversion tracts during mitotic and meiotic recombination, presumably by affecting the processivity of Pol δ, but confers no apparent defect in normal DNA synthesis (32, 33). Because BIR requires more-extensive tracts of DNA synthesis than gene conversion, we expected the pol3-ct mutant to exhibit a BIR defect. We found that in the absence of a fully functional Pol δ complex, chromosome fragment (CF) formation proceeds by a half-crossover mechanism associated with loss of the template chromosome, an event with potentially catastrophic consequences (6, 57). This was also found to occur in rad51 mutants, suggesting nonreciprocal translocations arise by failure to undergo strand invasion or because replication following strand invasion is inefficient. In contrast to rad51 mutants, the Pol δ complex mutants are proficient for repair of a 238-bp gap by gene conversion and fully resistant to ionizing radiation, suggesting there is a unique requirement for Pol δ to complete BIR. Consistent with studies of gene conversion in S. cerevisiae (33), we found no role for Pol η in BIR or the process of template switching.