Search

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion use for prophylaxis of corneal graft rejection in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty. Methods This study reviewed the charts of patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty who were treated with difluprednate (DP) ophthalmic emulsion postoperatively. At each follow-up visit, patients were followed for signs of graft rejection, cataract development, and intraocular pressure rise in addition to routine ocular examination. Results The charts of 36 patients (38 eyes) who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) (27 eyes) and PKP triple (11 eyes) were reviewed. All eyes were followed up for at least 8 months postoperatively. Five grafts developed rejection and three grafts subsequently failed. Six eyes had an increase of IOP that required use of antiglaucoma drops. Three eyes were switched from difluprednate to prednisolone acetate (PA) after persistent rise of IOP failed to respond to antiglaucoma drops. None of these cases needed glaucoma surgery. Two patients developed cataract during the follow-up period (out of 12 phakic eyes). Conclusion Topical difluprednate is potentially effective and safe in preventing graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty. Larger prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Ziad F Bashshur1, Abdallah M Terro1, Christelle P El Haibi1, Akaber M Halawi1, Alexandre Schakal2, Baha’ N Noureddin11The Department of Ophthalmology, American University of Beirut, Lebanon; 2The Department of Ophthalmology, Hotel Dieu de France (St. Joseph University), LebanonPurpose: To determine the pattern of increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and identify possible risk factors associated with this rise in IOP.Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of records for 185 patients (226 eyes) who received 4 mg of IVTA at the American University of Beirut Medical Center and Hotel Dieu de France eye clinics between 2003 and 2005.Results: Mean follow-up was 8.17 months (range 6 to 24 months). The mean number of IVTA injections per eye was 1.31 ± 0.69. The mean IOP increased after the first IVTA injection from 15.04 ± 3.18 mmHg at baseline to a mean maximum of 17.20 ± 5.75 mmHg (p < 0.0001, paired t-test) at month 3 of follow-up with a return to mean baseline IOP (15.49 ± 4.79 mmHg) at month 12. Fifty nine of 226 eyes showed IOP higher than 21 mmHg during follow-up. Nine eyes started to have IOP greater than 21 mmHg, 6 to 12 months after a single injection. Intraocular pressure lowering medications were started when IOP exceeded 25 mmHg in 15 of the 226 eyes studied. No risk factors have been found to predict this IOP rise.Conclusions: IOP elevation can occur in a significant number of eyes receiving 4 mg of IVTA. This phenomenon seems to be transient and a small number of eyes required treatment during this period. Eyes that received IVTA need to be monitored for IOP changes especially during the first 3 months, but the IOP may still rise 6 months and even 12 months after a single injection. This study did not show any risk factor that may predict this IOP rise.Keywords: intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, intraocular pressure elevation, diabetic macular edema, choroidal neovascular membrane due to age-related macular degeneration, central retinal vein occlusion, Branch retinal vein occlusion, Uveitis